Journals / Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

A five-year audit of cases with ectopic pregnancy in our clinic

Kliniğimizdeki ektopik gebelik olgularının beş yıllık analizi

Pages
139–144
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early diagnosis enables conservative management approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to review the ectopic pregnancy cases that administred to our clinic in the last five years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: According to the dermographic features, risk factors, clinical signs and treatment approaches, ninety-one cases with ectopic pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively between the years 2004-2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early diagnosis enables conservative management approaches.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to review the ectopic pregnancy cases that administred to our clinic in the last five years. Methods: According to the dermographic features, risk factors, clinical signs and treatment approaches, ninety-one cases with ectopic pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively between the years 2004-2009. For statistical analysis, SPSS was used. Results: The average age of the patients was 28,38±6,47 and ectopic pregnancies were mostly seen between the ages of 26-35. Mean gravid and parity were 3,86±2,55 and 2,34±2,16, respectively. The mean serum β-hCG level of the patients at the administration time to our clinic was 3085,41±6346,84 mix/L. The risk factors in the order of frequencies were previous abdomino-pelvic surgery (16 %), the use of intrauterine device (12 %), previous ectopic pregnancies (7 %) and previous pelvic inflammatory disease (2 %). The most common complaint on admission were abdominal pain (40 %) and following that in the order of frequencies were vaginal bleeding with pain ( 38 %) and only vaginal bleeding (15 %). As a treatment option, surgery, methotrexate and expectant management were applied to 66 %, 20% and 10% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Ectopic pregnancies are important health problems since they may interfere with fertility capability of the patient in her future life and may even cause maternal mortality. Especially, women who had abdomino-pelvic surgery before are at risk. Early diagnosis enables conservative management approaches.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, son beş yılda kliniğimizde tedavi edilen ektopik gebelik vakalarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2004–2009 yılları arasında 91 ektopik gebelik olgusu, dermografik özellikleri, risk faktörleri, klinik bulguları ve tedavi yaklaşımları açısından geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analiz için SPSS kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastalarımızın yaş ortalaması 28,38± 6,47 olup, ektopik gebeliğin en sık görüldüğü yaş aralığı 26-35’dir. Hastaların gravida ve parite ortalamaları sırasıyla 3,86± 2,55 ve 2,34± 2,16’ dır. Hastaların kliniğimize başvuru sırasındaki ortalama serum β-hCG düzeyi 3085,41± 6346,84 mIU/L idi. Risk faktörleri sıklık sırasına göre abdomino-pelvik cerrahi öyküsü (% 16), rahim içi araç öyküsü (% 12), geçirilmiş ektopik gebelik öyküsü (% 7), pelvik inflamatuar hastalık öyküsü (% 2) idi. Hastaların kliniğimize en sık başvuru şikâyeti karın ağrısı (% 40) olup bunu takiben sırası ile vajinal kanama ile birlikte ağrı (% 38) ve sadece vajinal kanama (% 15) idi. Olguların % 66’ sına cerrahi, % 20’ sine metotreksat, % 10’ una bekleme tedavisi yapılmıştır. Sonuç: Ektopik gebelikler, hastanın ilerideki hayatta fertilite yeteneğini bozması hatta maternal mortaliteye yol açabilmesi nedeniyle önemli bir sağlık sorunudur. Özellikle abdomino- pelvik cerrahi öyküsü olan kadınlar risk altındadır. Erken tanı, konservatif tedavi yaklaşımlarına olanak tanır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURDOĞLU, M., ÇİM, N., ŞAHİN, H. G., YILDIZHAN, R., ADALI, E., KOLUSARI, A., KAMACI, M. (2022). A five-year audit of cases with ectopic pregnancy in our clinic. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 139–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/631620

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 2005; 366: 583- 91
  2. Thonneau P, Hijazi Y, Goyaux N, Calvez T, Keita N. Ectopic pregnancy in Conakry, Guinea. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80: 365- 70
  3. Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy: challenging accepted management strategies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 346- 51
  4. Goktolga U. Ektopik Gebelik. Turkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2006; 2: 6- 12
  5. Kirk E, Bourne T. The nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 587- 93
  6. Murray H, Baakdah H, Bardell T, Tulandi T. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ 2005; 173: 905- 12
  7. Minnick-Smith K, Cook F. Current treatment options for ectopic pregnancy. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1997;22: 21- 5
  8. Musa J, Daru PH, Mutihir JT, Ujah IA. Ectopic pregnancy in Jos Northern Nigeria: prevalence and impact on subsequent fertility. Niger J Med 2009; 18: 35- 8
  9. Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy--risk factors and diagnosis. Aust Fam Physician 2006; 35: 854- 7
  10. Goldner TE, Lawson HW, Xia Z, Atrash HK. Surveillance for ectopic pregnancy--United States, 1970-1989. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1993; 42: 73- 85
  11. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in france. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 185- 94
  12. Storeide O, Veholmen M, Eide M, Bergsjo P, Sandvei R. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in hordaland county, norway 1976-1993. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 345- 9
  13. Skjeldestad FE, Hadgu A, Eriksson N. Epidemiology of repeat ectopic pregnancy: A population-based prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 129- 35
  14. Randic L, Haller H. Ectopic pregnancy among past iud users. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 38: 299- 304
  15. Doyle MB, DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Epidemiology and etiology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991; 18: 1- 17
  16. Pradhan P, Thapamagar SB, Maskey S. A profile of ectopic pregnancy at nepal medical college teaching hospital. Nepal Med Coll J 2006; 8: 238- 42. 17. şahin HG, Zeteroğlu ş, Sürücü R, Sucaklı H, Kamacı M. Ektopik gebeliklerde risk faktörleri ve tanı yöntemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Klinik Bilimler & Doktor 2004; 10: 696-700
  17. Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. The frequency of salpingitis and ectopic pregnancy as epidemiologic markers of chlamydia trachomatis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:123- 8
  18. Coste J, J