SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Erzurum ve çevresinde (Doğu Anadolu) parazitizm ve foreziye katkıda bulunan Helophoridae ve Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) türleri ile temel habitat özellikleri

The aquatic Coleoptera (Helophoridae and Hydrophilidae) species contributing the parasitisim and phoresy, with main habitat characteristics in Erzurum and surroundings (East Anatolia)

Orhan ERMAN
Ümit İNCEKARA
Pages
83–89
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Main habitat characteristics, placed by the species showing parasitism/phoresy, were also briefly discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cases of parasitism/phoresy were studied on the helophorid and hydrophilid (Coleoptera) material in East Anatolian Region (Erzurum and surroundings) for the first time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Five of 22 helophorid and three of 16 hydrophilid species were presented parasitism while two of 16 hydrophilid species were presented phoresy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Main habitat characteristics, placed by the species showing parasitism/phoresy, were also briefly discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cases of parasitism/phoresy were studied on the helophorid and hydrophilid (Coleoptera) material in East Anatolian Region (Erzurum and surroundings) for the first time. Five of 22 helophorid and three of 16 hydrophilid species were presented parasitism while two of 16 hydrophilid species were presented phoresy. Most cases of parasitism were observed in the hydrophilid species Laccobius gracilis Motschulsky. All aquatic mites were carried under the second wings. Main habitat characteristics, placed by the species showing parasitism/phoresy, were also briefly discussed.

Özet

Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi’ndeki (Erzurum ve çevresi) heloforid ve hidrofilid (Coleoptera) materyali üzerinde parazitizm ve forezi durumu ilk defa çalışılmıştır. 22 heloforid türünün beşinde ve 16 hidrofilid türünün üçünde parazitizm, 16 hidrofilid türünün ikisinde ise forezi durumu tespit edilmiştir. En çok parazitizm bir hidrofilid türü olan Laccobius gracilis Motschulsky’te gözlenmiştir. Bütün sucul akarların ikinci çift kanatların altında taşındığı görülmüştür. Parazitizm/forezi görülen türlerin yerleştiği habitatların temel özellikleri kısaca tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERMAN, O., İNCEKARA, Ü. (2022). Erzurum ve çevresinde (Doğu Anadolu) parazitizm ve foreziye katkıda bulunan Helophoridae ve Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) türleri ile temel habitat özellikleri. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 83–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/628320

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baker, R. A., S. Brett & N. Morley, 1991. “Water mites larvae parasitic on insects - A study of larval structures and host relationships, 493-496”. In: Modern Acaralogy (Eds.: Dushabek, F. & F. Bukva). Academia Prague and SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Haque. Bhonak, A. J., B. P. Smith & M. Thornton, 2004. Distributional morphological and genetic consequences of dispersal for temporary pond water mites. Freshwater Biology, 49: 170-180.
  2. Conroy, J. C. & J. L. Kuhn, 1977. New annotated records of donata from the province of Mannitoba eith notes on their parasitism by larvae of water mites. Mannitoba Entomology, 11: 27-40.
  3. Mithcell, R., 1959. Life histories and larval behaviour of Arrenurid water mites parasitisizing Odonata. Journal of New York Entomology Society, 67: 1-2.
  4. Mithcell, R., 1969. The use of parasitic mites to age Dragonflies. American Naturalist, 103: 331-346.
  5. Smith, I. M., 1978. Descriptions and observations on host associations of larval Arrenuroidea (Prostigmata, Parasitengona), with comment on phylogeny in the superfamily. Canadian Entomologist, 110: 957-1001.
  6. Smith, B. P., 1986. New species of Hydrachna (Acari: Hydrachnida) parasitic on Water Boatmen (Insecta: Hemiptera: Corixidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65: 2630-2639.
  7. Smith, B. P., 1988 a. Host-parasite interaction and impact of larval water mites on insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 33: 487-507.
  8. Smith, B. P., 1988 b. Impact of parasitism by larval Limnochares aquatica (Acari: Hydrachnidia; Limnocharidae) on juvenile Gerris comatus, Gerris alacris and Gerris buenoi (Insecta: Hemiptera: Gerridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67: 2238-2243.
  9. Zawal, A., 2002. Parasitism of water mite larvae (Hydrachnellae) of the genus Hydrachna on water beetles in Poland. Acarologia, 42: 361-370.
  10. Zawal, A., 2003. Parasitism of water mite larvae (Hydrachnellae) of the genus Eylais on water beetles in Poland. Acarologia, 43: 39-47.
  11. Zawal, A., 2004. Parasitising of Dragon Flies by water mite larvae of the genus Arrenurus of the neighbourhood of Barlinek (NW Poland). Zoologica Poloniae, 49: 37-45.
  12. Zawal, A., 2006. Phoresy and parasitism: water mite larvae of the genus Arrenurus (Acari: Hydrachnida) on Odonata from Lake Bnowskie (NW Poland). Biological Letters, 43: 257-276.