SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Random SNP Events for Diabetes and Their Molecular Interaction Neighborhood

Rastgele Diyabet SNP Olayları ve Moleküler Etkileşim Komşuluğu

Ertuğrul DALGIÇ
Pages
99–105
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consideration of network level relationships enlarge the effect of the genomic variations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Genomics studies provide a collection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) which are significantly associated with various diseases and other conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Frequency of T2DM associated SNP events could be investigated by genome scale randomizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consideration of network level relationships enlarge the effect of the genomic variations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diyabet · Tek Nükleotid Polimorfizmi · Sistem Biyolojisi

Abstract

Aim: Genomics studies provide a collection of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) which are significantly associated with various diseases and other conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Frequency of T2DM associated SNP events could be investigated by genome scale randomizations. Based on mapped genes for SNP events, molecular interaction neighborhood could also be analyzed.Material and Methods: Random SNP events were generated for the human genome. Frequencies of different unique T2DM associated SNP events were analyzed. Mapped genes for the SNPs were collected and their direct molecular interaction neighborhood was analyzed. Insulin Signaling (IS) Pathway was also checked to observe if it was targeted by the T2DM associated SNPs.Results: Having at least a single T2DM associated SNP randomly, was observed to be likely. The effect of random SNP events expanded, when network neighborhood was considered. Some SNPs and their mapped genes were more frequently targeted than others. Although IS Pathway members were rarely targeted, network neighborhood also expanded the influence on IS Pathway.Conclusion: Randomly expected variations in individual genomes are likely to affect diabetes susceptibility. Consideration of network level relationships enlarge the effect of the genomic variations.

Özet

Amaç: Genomik çalışmalar, tip 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) dahil olmak üzere, birçok hastalık ve diğer fenotiplerle önemli ilişkileri olanTek Nükleotid Polimorfizmleri koleksiyonu sunmaktadır. T2DM ilişkili SNP olaylarının frekansı genom düzeyinde rastgeleleştirmeanaliziyle incelenebilir. SNP olayları ile eşleştirilen genlere dayanarak, moleküler etkileşim düzeyindeki etkiler incelenebilir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: İnsan genomu için rastgele SNP olayları oluşturuldu. Farklı T2DM ilişkili SNP olaylarının frekansları incelendi.SNP olaylarıyla eşleştirilmiş genler elde edildi ve bu genlerin doğrudan moleküler etkileşim komşuları incelendi. Ayrıca İnsülinSinyalleşmesi (IS) Yolağının, T2DM ilişkili SNP olaylarının hedefinde olup olmadığı kontrol edildi.Bulgular: En az bir adet T2DM ilişkili SNP’nin rastgele olarak gözlemlenmesi olası olarak bulundu. Ağ komşuluğu göz önüne alındığında,rastgele SNP olaylarının etkisi genişledi. Bazı SNP’ler ve bunlarla eşleştirilmiş olan genler, diğerlerine göre daha sıkça hedeflendi. ISYolağı üyeleri nadiren hedeflendi, ancak ağ komşuluğu bu yolağa olan etkiyi de genişletti.Sonuç: Bireysel genomlarda rastgele beklenen varyasyonlar diyabet duyarlılığını muhtemelen etkiler. Ağ düzeyi etkileşimler genomikvaryasyonların etkisini genişletir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DALGIÇ, E. (2022). Random SNP Events for Diabetes and Their Molecular Interaction Neighborhood. Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 99–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/627951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP,Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA, Abecasis GR. A globalreference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015
  2. 526(7571):68-74. doi:10.1038/nature15393. 2. Hardy J, Singleton A. Genomewide association studies and human disease. N EnglJ Med. 2009
  3. 360(17):1759-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0808700. 3. Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q, Sklar P, McCarthy MI, Brown MA, Yang J. 10Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation. Am J Hum Genet.2017
  4. 101(1):5-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005. 4. Kharroubi AT, Darwish HM. Diabetes mellitus: The epidemic of the century.World J Diabetes. 2015
  5. 6(6):850-67. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i6.850. 5. Ginter E, Simko V. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, pandemic in 21st century. Adv ExpMed Biol. 2012
  6. Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J, Malangone C,McMahon A, Morales J, Mountjoy E, Sollis E, Suveges D, Vrousgou O, Whetzel PL,Amode R, Guillen JA, Riat HS, Trevanion SJ, Hall P, Junkins H, Flicek P, Burdett T, Hindorff LA, Cunningham F, Parkinson H. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog ofpublished genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019
  7. 47(D1):D1005-D1012. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120. 7. Xue A, Wu Y, Zhu Z, Zhang F, Kemper KE, Zheng Z, Yengo L, Lloyd-Jones LR,Sidorenko J, Wu Y
  8. eQTLGen Consortium, McRae AF, Visscher PM, Zeng J, Yang J.Genome-wide association analyses identify 143 risk variants and putativeregulatory mechanisms for type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2018
  9. 9(1):2941.doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04951-w. 8. Auffray C, Chen Z, Hood L. Systems medicine: the future of medical genomicsand healthcare. Genome Med. 2009
  10. 1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/gm2. 9. Caldera M, Buphamalai P, Müller F, Menche J. Interactome-based approaches to human disease. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2017
  11. doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.04.015. 10. Fröjdö S, Vidal H, Pirola L. Alterations of insulin signaling in type 2diabetes: a review of the current evidence from humans. Biochim Biophys Acta.2009
  12. 1792(2):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.10.019. 11. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID:a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006
  13. 34(Database issue):D535-9. 12. Yates B, Braschi B, Gray KA, Seal RL, Tweedie S, Bruford EA. Genenames.org:the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2017. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017
  14. 45(D1):D619-D625. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw103