Journals / Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Important entomophagus birds in biological control

Biyolojik mücadelede önemli entomofag kuşlar

Pages
51–65
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we aimed to especially give information about the importance of birds that are effective in protecting against pests of forests within biological control.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The pressure of vertebrates on pests is very high.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among these vertebrates, birds rank first.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we aimed to especially give information about the importance of birds that are effective in protecting against pests of forests within biological control.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyolojik etmen · entomofag kuşlar · orman zararlıları

Abstract

The pressure of vertebrates on pests is very high. Among these vertebrates, birds rank first. Insectivorous birds are accepted as active agents in the control of forest and agricultural pests. They protect the natural balance by eating the adults, larvae, pupae and eggs of insects. In this review, we aimed to especially give information about the importance of birds that are effective in protecting against pests of forests within biological control.

Özet

Zararlı böcekler üzerinde omurgalıların baskısı oldukça yüksektir. Bu omurgalılar arasında kuşlar ilk sırayı almaktadır. Böcekçil kuşlar, ormanlarda ve tarımda zararlı olan böceklerin mücadelesinde potansiyel etkin etmen olarak kabul görmektedirler. Böceklerin erginlerini, pupalarını, larvalarını ve yumurtalarını yiyerek doğal dengeyi korunmaktadırlar. Bu derlemede özellikle ormanların zararlılara karşı korunmasında etkili olan kuşların biyolojik mücadeledeki önemi hakkında bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYAHAN, A., KARACA, İ. (2022). Important entomophagus birds in biological control. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 51–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/626997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al - Melhim W.N., Z.S. Amr, A.M. Disi & A.K. Bader 1997.
  2. On the Diet of the Little Owl, Athene noctua, in the Safawi Area, Eastern Jordan. Zoology in the Middle East, Heidelberg, 15: 19-28. Alexander I. & B. Cresswell 1990. Foraging by nightjars Caprimulgus europaeus away from their nesting areas. Ibis, 132: 568–574.
  3. Barba E., D.M. Garcia, J.A. Gil-Delgado & G.M. Lopez 1994. Moth abundance and breeding success in a Great Tit population where moths are the main nestling food. Ardea, 82: 329–33
  4. Barbaro L., J. Nezan, M. Bakker, F. Revers, L. Couzi, F. Vetillard & O.Le Gall 2003. Distribution par habitats des oiseaux nicheurs a enjeu de conservation en foret des Landes de Gascogne. Le Courbageot 21–22, 12–23.
  5. Barbaro L., J.P. Rossi, F. Vetillard, J. Nezan & H. Nezan 2007. The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure. Journal of Biogeography, 34: 652–664. Barbaro L. & A. Battisti 2011. Birds as predators of the pine processinary moth (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Biological Control, 56: 107 – 114. Barbaro L., L. Couzi, V. Bretagnolle, J. Nezan, & F. Vetillard 2008. Multi-scale habitat selection and foraging ecology of the eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops) in pine plantations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17: 1073–1087.
  6. Barber N.A., R.J. Marquis & W.P. Tori 2008. Invasive prey impacts regional distribution of native predators. Ecology, 89: 2678–2683.
  7. Battisti A., M. Bernardi & C. Ghiraldo 2000. Predation by the hoopoe on pupae of Thaumetopoea pityocampa and the likely influence on other natural enemies. Biocontrol, 45: 311–323. Bellocq M.I. 2000. A review of the trophic ecology of the Barn Owl in Argentina. Journal of Raptor Research, 34 (2): 108- 119. Biliotti E. 1958. Les parasites et predateurs de Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lepidoptera). Entomophaga, 3: 23–24. Blondel J. 1985. Breeding strategies of the blue tit and coal tit (Parus) in mainland and island Mediterranean habitats: a comparison. Journal of Animal Ecology,54: 531–556.
  8. Bock A., B. Naef-Daenzer, H. Keil, F. Korner-Nievergelt, M. Perrig & M.U. Perrig 2013. Roost site selection by Little Owls Athene noctua in relation to environmental conditions and life-history stages. Ibis, 155: 847 – 856p. Bon M., E. Ratti & A. Sartor 2001. Variazione stagionale della dietta della Civetta Athene noctua (Scopoli, 1769) in una localita agricola della gronda lagunare Venezia. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Venez