SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19

Free movement of judgments between the member states of the European union

Avrupa birliği'ne üye devletler arasında mahkeme kararlarının serbest dolaşımı

Tuba Birinci UZUN
Pages
997–1038
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The basic regulations enforced by the EU and examined in this texts are Council Regulation EC No 44/2001 of December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recog­ ition and Enforcement of the Judgments in Civil and Com- n mercial Matters (Brussels I Regulation), Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and the Matters of Parental Responsibility (Brus- sels II bis Regulation) and Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of December 2008 May 2000 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition and Enforcement of decisions and Cooperation in Matters Relating to Maintenance Obligations (The Maintenance Regulation).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Taking into consideration the historical development of the European Union, it can be said that the European Union is based on four fundamental freedoms: free move- ment of persons, goods, capital and services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to ensure the survival of these four fundamental freedoms making a judicial cooperation between the member states of the European Union is inevitable.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The basic regulations enforced by the EU and examined in this texts are Council Regulation EC No 44/2001 of December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recog­ ition and Enforcement of the Judgments in Civil and Com- n mercial Matters (Brussels I Regulation), Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and the Matters of Parental Responsibility (Brus- sels II bis Regulation) and Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of December 2008 May 2000 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition and Enforcement of decisions and Cooperation in Matters Relating to Maintenance Obligations (The Maintenance Regulation).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Taking into consideration the historical development of the European Union, it can be said that the European Union is based on four fundamental freedoms: free move- ment of persons, goods, capital and services. In order to ensure the survival of these four fundamental freedoms making a judicial cooperation between the member states of the European Union is inevitable. The basic regulations enforced by the EU and examined in this texts are Council Regulation EC No 44/2001 of December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recog­ ition and Enforcement of the Judgments in Civil and Com- n mercial Matters (Brussels I Regulation), Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and the Matters of Parental Responsibility (Brus- sels II bis Regulation) and Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of December 2008 May 2000 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition and Enforcement of decisions and Cooperation in Matters Relating to Maintenance Obligations (The Maintenance Regulation).

Özet

Avrupa Birliği’nin tarihi gelişimine yakından bakıldığında malların, sermayenin, hizmetlerin ve kişilerin serbest dolaşımı olmak üzere dört temel özgürlük üzerine ku- rulduğu söylenebilir. Bu dört temel özgürlüğün sağlanabilmesi ve yaşatılabilmesi için Avrupa Birliği’ne üye devletler arasında bir adli işbirliğin yapılması kaçınılmazdır. Bu doğrultuda Avrupa Birliği tarafından hazırlanan ve uygulanan bununla birlikte bu çalışmada incelenen temel düzenlemeler ise şunlardır: Hukuki ve Ticari Konularda Mahkemelerin Milletlerarası Yetkisi ve Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizi Hakkında 2001/44 EC sayılı Avrupa Birliği Konsey Tüzüğü (Brüksel I Tüzüğü), Evli- lik ve Müşterek Çocukların Velayetiyle ilgili Konularda Mahke­ elerin Milletlerarası m Yetkisi ve Mahkeme Kararlarının Tanınması ve Tenfizine İlişkin 2003/2201EC sayılı Avrupa Birliği Konsey Tüzüğü (Brüksel IIbis Tüzüğü) ve Nafaka Borçlarında Millet- lerarası Yetki, Uygulanacak Hukuk, Tanıma, Tenfiz ve İşbirliği Hakkında 2009/4EC sayılı Avrupa Birliği Konsey Tüzüğü (Nafaka Tüzüğü).

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, T. B. (2022). Free movement of judgments between the member states of the European union. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19, 997–1038. https://ajindex.com/articles/626467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aktürk, Aylin: Milletlerarası Aile Hukukunda Nafaka ve Nafaka Borçlarında Milletlerarası Yetki, Uygulanacak Hukuk, Tanıma, Tenfiz ve İşbirliğine İlişkin 4/2009 No’lu Avrupa Birliği Konseyi Tüzüğü, MHB 2011, S.2, s.1-33.
  2. Bayraktaroğlu Özçelik, Gülüm: Avrupa Topluluğunun Milletlerarası Özel Hu- kuk Alanında Uluslararası Anlaşma Akdetme Yetkisi ve C-01/03 Sayılı ve 7 Şubat 2006 Tarihli Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı Görüşü, AÜHFD, 2008, C.57, S.2, s.17-49.
  3. Çalışkan, Yusuf/Çalışkan, Zeynep: The Free Movement of Judgments within the European Union, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Yıl:68, S. 2010/3, s.13-22.
  4. Çiçekli, Bülent: Avrupa Birliğinde Özel Hukukta Adli İşbirliği ve Mahkeme Kararlarının Serbest Dolaşımı, MHB 2003, Prof. Dr. Gülören Tekinalp’e Ar- mağan, S.1-2, s.179-202.
  5. Ekşi, Nuray: Avrupa Birliği Brüksel IIbis Tüzüğüne Göre Boşanma Davala- rında Üye Devlet Mahkemelerinin Milletlerarası Yetkisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniver- sitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2009, C.11, Özel S., s. 1139-1168. (Brüksel IIbis Tüzüğü) Ekşi, Nuray: Türk Mahkemelerinin Milletlerarası Yetkisi, 2. Baskı, İstanbul 2000, s.50-59. (Türk Mahkemelerinin Milletlerarası Yetkisi) Ekşi, Nuray: Devletler Özel Hukukunda Aşırı Yetki Kuralları, Selâhattin Sulhi Tekinay’ın Hatırasına Armağan, İstanbul 1999, s.247-258.
  6. Ekşi, Nuray: Provisional and Protective Measures in Internatio­al Litigation under the Brussels Convention, 6 (1991) 1-3 Hukuk Araştırma­arı, s.76-87.
  7. Ekşi, Nuray: The Basic Types of Measures and General Requi­rements for Granting Interim Orders in the Laws of the EC Member States, 7 (1992-1993) 1-3 Hukuk Araştırmaları, s.301-319.
  8. Harris, J.: The Brussels Regulation, Civil Justice Quarterly, Vol. 20, July, 2001, s.219. Kennett, Wendy: The Brussels I Regulation, The International and Comparati- ve Law Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Jul. 2001), s.725-737.
  9. Lane, Suriyakumari: Free Movement of Judgments within the EEC, The In- ternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 3 (Jul. 1986), s.629- 643. Long, Eimear: The New Hague Maintenance Convention, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4 (Oct. 2008), s.984-996.
  10. Magnus, Ulrich: Introduction: Brussels I Regulation, Editors: Ulrich Magnus/ Peter Mankowski, Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007.
  11. McEleavy, Peter: The Brussels II Regulation: How the European Community Has Moved into Family Law, The International and Comparative Law Quar- terly, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Oct. 2002), s.883-908.
  12. Merrett, Louise: The Enforcement of Jurisd