Journals / Türk İdare Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 487

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITION OF THE TURKISH MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR

İÇİŞLERİ BAKANLIĞININ YÖNETİM GELENEĞİ

Pages
389–424
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I chose the ethnographic qualitative research design thatdescribes the political-administrator elites’ world from their own standpoints.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Perceptions of general incapacity of the bureaucracy has triggeredpersistent public administration reforms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The administrative tradition of theTurkey was seen a major barrier to develop high standard public services.Instead, this article try to understand and describe the administrative traditionof Turkey, especially Turkish Ministry of Interior (MoI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I chose the ethnographic qualitative research design thatdescribes the political-administrator elites’ world from their own standpoints.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Perceptions of general incapacity of the bureaucracy has triggeredpersistent public administration reforms. The administrative tradition of theTurkey was seen a major barrier to develop high standard public services.Instead, this article try to understand and describe the administrative traditionof Turkey, especially Turkish Ministry of Interior (MoI). In addition, it suggeststhe administrative tradition as valuable repository of experience and challengethat highlight how to tackle current and future possible issues. Furthermore, thisarticle provides robust reasons for how the tradition of the MoI has persisted inspite of these reforms. I chose the ethnographic qualitative research design thatdescribes the political-administrator elites’ world from their own standpoints.

Özet

Bürokrasinin kapasitesinin genel yetersizliği ile ilgili algılar Kamu yönetimi reformların sürekli tetiklemiştir. Türk yönetim geleneği yüksek standartlı kamu hizmetlerinin gelişmesinde baş engel olarak görülmüştür. Bu algıların aksine, bu makale yönetim geleneğini, özellikle İçişleri Bakanlığının, şu andaki ve gelecekteki muhtemel sorunlarda yol gösterici olan değerli tecrübe ve mücadelenin deposu olarak önermektedir. Ayrıca bu makale sürekli reformlara rağmen İçişleri Bakanlığının yönetim geleneğin sürekliğine dair güçlü sebepler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, politikacı ve yönetici elitlerinin dünyalarını onların gözünden tasvir ettiği için etnografik methodu seçtim.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, M. (2022). THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITION OF THE TURKISH MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR. Türk İdare Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 487, 389–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/625361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Balci, O., (2015). The changing roles of governors and district governors in Turkey, 2000-2014 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton). Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A., (2012). Interpretivism and the analysis of traditions and practices. Critical policy studies, 6(2), pp.201-208. Available: Google scholar Boll, K. and Rhodes, R.A., (2015). Excursions in administrative ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(2). Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/ JOE-05-2015-0013 (Retrieved 03/03/2017)
  2. Çiner, C.U., (2014). Reconsidering the Role of the Prefects in Turkey: Public Policies and Metropolization, International Journal of Public Administration, 37(8), 445-455. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903277
  3. Crawley, J. and Kutlu, O., (2009). UNDP Institutional Review of the Ministry of the Interior for Effective Civilian Oversight. (Retrieved from its author via mail) Dinçer, Ö. and Yılmaz, C., (2003). Kamu yönetiminde yeniden yapılanma 1: Değişimin yönetimi için yönetimde değişim. [Change in Management for the Management of Change] TC Başbakanlık. Eryılmaz, B., (2013). Bürokrasi ve Siyaset: Bürokratik Devletten Etkin Yönetime. [Bureucracy and Politics: From bureaucratic state to effective administration/management.] 5th ed. Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım Limited Şti. Feslihan, M., (2016). Exploring How Decentralisation Works in the Territorial Administration of Turkey 2004-2014: The Case of the Kocaeli Province (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton). Hood, C. and Lodge, M., (2007). End piece: Civil Service Reform Syndrome– Are We Heading for a Cure? Transformation, pp.58-59. Available: Google scholar Lindquist, E. and Tiernan, A., (2011). The Australian public service and policy advising: Meeting the challenges of 21st century governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(4), 437-450. Available: http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00748.x/epdf Retrieved 26/05/2015)
  4. Painter, M. and Peters, B.G., (2010). The Analysis of Administrative Traditions. In: Painter M., Peters B.G. (Eds) Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 3-16).
  5. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Peters, B.G., (2008). The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118-132. Available: Google scholar Rhodes, R.A., (1999). Traditions and public sector reform: Comparing Britain and Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 341-370. Available: Google scholar Rhodes, R.A.W., (2011a). Everyday li