SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk İdare Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 489

FINANCE OF TERRORISM AND THE GLOBAL POLITICAL ECONOMY

TERÖRİZMİN FİNASMANI VE KÜRESEL POLİTİK EKONOMİ

Selim ÇAPAR
Kürşad Kağan ERGÜN
Pages
187–209
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To do so,authors try to determine whether there is a relationship between the existence ofterrorism with political and economical structure of state and tries to understandif the structure of state and market has any effect on the vulnerabilities fromterrorism and what are the effects of market structures on finance of terrorism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, after explaining the economical dimension of terrorismand measures taken against it, authors discuss the cause-effect relationship ofdifferent theoretical market structures with terrorism and its finance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, after explaining the economical dimension of terrorismand measures taken against it, authors discuss the cause-effect relationship ofdifferent theoretical market structures with terrorism and its finance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To do so,authors try to determine whether there is a relationship between the existence ofterrorism with political and economical structure of state and tries to understandif the structure of state and market has any effect on the vulnerabilities fromterrorism and what are the effects of market structures on finance of terrorism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, after explaining the economical dimension of terrorismand measures taken against it, authors discuss the cause-effect relationship ofdifferent theoretical market structures with terrorism and its finance. To do so,authors try to determine whether there is a relationship between the existence ofterrorism with political and economical structure of state and tries to understandif the structure of state and market has any effect on the vulnerabilities fromterrorism and what are the effects of market structures on finance of terrorism.

Özet

Bu çalışmada yazarlar, terörün ekonomik boyutunu ve buna karşı alınan önlemleri açıkladıktan sonra, farklı teorik piyasa yapılarının terörizm ile finansmanı arasındaki neden-sonuç ilişkisini tartışıyor. Bunu yapmak için, yazarlar, terörizm ile, devletin siyasi ve ekonomik yapısı arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını, eğer devletin siyasi ve ekonomik yapısının, devletin terörizme karşı oluşması muhtemel zaafiyetleri üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi varsa, bu etkileri neden sonuç ilişkisi içerisinde belirlemeye odaklanmaktadır. Ayrıca terörizmin finansmanı değişik pazar ekonomileri arasındaki etkileşimler üzerinde de durulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAPAR, S., ERGÜN, K. K. (2022). FINANCE OF TERRORISM AND THE GLOBAL POLITICAL ECONOMY. Türk İdare Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 489, 187–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/625356

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AAP-06 NATO Glossary of Terms And Definitions (2014), NATO. https://www.cimiccoe org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/NATO-EU-UN-glossary-on-DCB-and-CP. pdf (27.09.2019).
  2. Anadolu Agency (2019), “Drug Trafficking: Financial Lifeline of PKK Terrorism”. Ankara: Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/drug-traffickingfinancial- lifeline-of-pkk-terrorism/1397868. (03.05.2019).
  3. Brantly, A. (2014), “Financing Terror Bit By Bit”, CTC Sentinel 7 (14). Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (1996),
  4. United Nations. Congress of USA (2002), Homeland Security Act Vol. 2656, Congress of USA. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2005), “Reports and Publications”, FBI. Frantz, D. (2002), “Threats and responses: qaeda’s bankrolls; Front Companies Said to Keep Financing Terrorists”. The New York Times, 2002. http:// query.nytimes.com/gst/ fullpage. DE1330F93AA2575AC0A9649C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print. (05.05.2019).
  5. Ganor, B. (1998), “Countering State-Sponsored Terrorism”, Israel: International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. https://www.ict.org.il/Article.aspx?ID=1140#gsc. tab=0. (05.05.2019).
  6. Gonultas, B. (2016), “Turkish Police Raid 51 FETO-Linked Companies”, Anadolu Agency, 2016. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/todays-headlines/turkish-police-raid- 51-feto-linked-companies/629293. (03.05.2019).
  7. Greenberg, M. R., William F. W., and L. S. Woloski (2002), “Terrorist Financing”, USA: Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/report/terrorist-financing. (29.04.2019).
  8. Gunther, Michael M. (1985) “Transnational Sources of Support for Armenian Terrorism”. Conflict Quarterly, 1985. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/ article/viewFile/14692/15761As. (02.05.2019)
  9. Harmon, C. C. (2013),
  10. Terrorism Today, Oxon [England]: Routledge. Hodgson, J. S. and V. Tadros (2013), “The Impossibility of Defining Terrorism.” New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 16, no. 3 (2013): 494-526. doi:10.1525/nclr. 2013.16.3.494. Lansky, J. (2018), “Possible State Approaches to Cryptocurrencies”, Journal of Systems Integration, 9/1: 19–31. doi:10.20470/jsi.v9i1.335. Lenzen, V. F. (1937), “Newton’s Third Law of Motion,” Isis 27, no. 2 (Aug., 1937): 258-260.
  11. Lowy Institute (2018), “Charities and Terrorism: Lessons From The Syrian Crisis”. Lowy Institute. https://publications.lowyinstitute.org/archive/charitiesand- terrorism-lessons-from-the-syrian-crisis/. (06.05.2019)
  12. Meshal, S. (2018), “The United Arab Emirates And Saudi Arabia Are Aiding Terrorists In Y