Journals / Türk İdare Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 490

WHICH ONES ARE MORE PERSUASIVE AND PROMOTIVE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES: FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL INCENTIVES?

HANGİSİ KAMU ÇALIŞANLARI İÇİN DAHA İKNA EDİCİ VE TEŞVİK EDİCİDİR: FİNANSAL TEŞVİKLER Mİ FİNANSAL OLMAYAN TEŞVİKLER Mİ?

Pages
297–324
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it also needs to regard non-financial incentives when astudy on higher motivation for public employees.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Inefficiency and unproductivity have been among the most prominentissues in the public sector for a few decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the general perspective,to increase public employees’ working performance, their motivation shouldbe increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it also needs to regard non-financial incentives when astudy on higher motivation for public employees.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Inefficiency and unproductivity have been among the most prominentissues in the public sector for a few decades. According to the general perspective,to increase public employees’ working performance, their motivation shouldbe increased. There are many motivation theories suggesting many incentivesand rewards for getting higher motivation in the literature. Furthermore, manyscholars also preferred to list a set of reward types or to mention incentiveclassifications.Despite the popularity of financial incentives, non-financial incentivesalso play an important role in increasing levelof employees’ motivation andperformance. Therefore, the issue of non-financial rewards and incentives isalso another important area, which has been delved and explored by scholarsstudying on individual motivation and performance around the world. Certainly,financial rewards are among the “preferable” and significant motivators but theyshould be used carefully in the public sector, especially in some countries having astrict personnel management system and more social-equalitarian labor relationssuch as Turkey. Therefore, it also needs to regard non-financial incentives when astudy on higher motivation for public employees.

Özet

Etkinsizlik ve verimsizlik son yıllarda kamu kesiminde en çok öne çıkan meseleler arasındadır. Genel bakış açısına göre, kamu çalışanlarının iş performanslarının artırılması için motivasyonları yükseltilmelidir. Literatürde yüksek motivasyona erişebilmek için çok sayıda teşvik edici araç ve ödül öneren motivasyon teorisi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca birçok bilim insanı da sadece bir takım ödül türlerini listelemeyi ya da güdüleyici sınıflandırmalarından bahsetmeyi tercih etmiştir. Finansal tabanlı teşvik edicilerinin yaygın kullanımına rağmen, parasal olmayan teşvikler de çalışanların motivasyonunun ve performans seviyelerinin yükseltilmesinde önemli bir oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle finansal olmayan teşvik ediciler ve ödüller meselesi, bireysel motivasyon ve performans konularında çalışan bilim insanları tarafından tüm dünya genelinde incelenen ve analiz edilen bir diğer önemli alandır. Elbette finansal ödüller tercih edilebilir ve önemli güdüleyiciler arasındadır ancak, bu araçların özellikle Türkiye gibi katı bir personel yönetimi sistemine ve daha sosyal-eşitlikçi çalışma ilişkilerine sahip ülkelerin kamu kesiminde dikkatlice kullanılmaları gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle finansal olmayan teşvik edici araçların da kamu çalışanlarına daha yüksek motivasyon sağlanmasına yönelik çalışmalarda dikkate alınması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZLU, A. (2022). WHICH ONES ARE MORE PERSUASIVE AND PROMOTIVE FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES: FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL INCENTIVES?. Türk İdare Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 490, 297–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/625340

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Andersson, T. and Liff, R. (2012), “Multiprofessional Cooperation and Accountability Pressures Consequences of a Post-New Public Management Concept in a New Public Management Context”, Public Management Review, Vol: 14, Issue: 6, p. 835–855.
  2. Barnard, C.I. (1938),
  3. The Functions of the Executive, United States, Harvard University Press.
  4. Belle, N. and Cantarelli, P. (2015), “Monetary Incentives, Motivation, and Job Effortin the Public Sector:An Experimental Study With Italian Government Executives”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol: 35, Issue: 2, p. 99- 123. Buelens, M. and Van den Broeck. H. (2007), “An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations”, Public Administration Review, Vol: 67, Issue: 1, p. 65-74.
  5. Cheng, K.T. (2015), “Public Service Motivation and Job Performance in Public Utilities”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol: 28, Issue: 4/5, p. 352 – 370. DiIulio, J. (1994), “Principled Agents: The Cultural Bases of Behavior in a Federal Government Bureaucracy,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol: 4, Issue: 3, p. 277-318.
  6. Downs, A. (1967),
  7. Inside bureaucracy, Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Eijkenaar, F., Emmert, M., Scheppach, M., and Schöffski, O. (2013), “Effects of Pay for Performance in Health Care: A Systematic Review ofSystematic Reviews”, Health Policy, Issue: 110, p. 115– 130. Gaki, E., N. Kontodimopoulos and D. Niakas (2013), “Investigating Demographic, Work-Related and Job Satisfaction Variables as Predictors of Motivation in Greek Nurses”, Journal of Nursing Management, Issue: 21, p. 483–490.
  8. Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., Strunz, S. and Heuson, C. (2018), “Public Choice Barriers to Efficient Climate Adaptation – Theoretical Insights and Lessons Learned from German Flood Disasters”, Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol: 14, Issue: 3, p. 473–499.
  9. Georgellis Y., Iossa E. and Tabvuma V. (2011), “Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol: 21, Issue: 3, p. 473-493.
  10. Gerhart, B. and Fang, M. (2013), “Pay for (Individual) Performance: Issues, Claims, Evidence andthe Role of Sorting Effects”, Human Resource Management Review. Gibbs, M.A. (1980), The Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Work Performance, Job Satisfaction and Intrinsic Motivation, Dissertation, Graduate Facultyof Texas Tech University. Greene, R.J. (2015), “Reward Performance? What Else?”, Compensation & Benefits Review