Journals / Türkbilig / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 29

Kör- To See in Kutadgu Bilig: Polysemy, Metaphor and Grammaticalization

KUTADGU BİLİG'DE KÖR- GÖRMEK : ÇOK ANLAMLILIK, METAFOR ve GRAMERLEŞME

Journal
Türkbilig
Pages
59–76
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All these improvements will be assessed in the light of the cognitive and typological studies on the perceptual verb KÖR- to see in Kutadgu Bilig.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study focuses on a linguistic analysis of one of the perceptual verbskör- which has a high frequency rate in Kutadgu Bilig.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Kutadgu Bilig, one of the voluminous works of Islamic Turkish Literature, in addition to its conceptual meaning, to see ,the verb kör- is polysemous with its meaningsto comprehend , to know , and to perceive .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All these improvements will be assessed in the light of the cognitive and typological studies on the perceptual verb KÖR- to see in Kutadgu Bilig.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study focuses on a linguistic analysis of one of the perceptual verbskör- which has a high frequency rate in Kutadgu Bilig. In Kutadgu Bilig, one of the voluminous works of Islamic Turkish Literature, in addition to its conceptual meaning, to see ,the verb kör- is polysemous with its meaningsto comprehend , to know , and to perceive . At this point, this verb comes into prominence with its conceptual metaphorical value. Moreover, the perception verbkör- can be the subject of the grammaticalization process in Kutadgu Bilig. Especially with its meaning to experience , a grammatical improvement that can be labeled as an experience action form draws attention. All these improvements will be assessed in the light of the cognitive and typological studies on the perceptual verb KÖR- to see in Kutadgu Bilig.

Özet

Eldeki çalışma, Kutadgu Biligde sıklık değeri yüksek algı fiillerinden biri olan KÖR- fiilinin dilbilimsel incelemesi üzerine yoğunlaşmaktadır. İslamî Türk Edebiyatının en hacimli eserlerinden biri olan Kutadgu Biligde KÖR- fiili, fiziksel görme (vision) anlamlarının dışında anlamak, bilmek, idrâk etmek, tecrübe etmekgibi çok anlamlı yapılar da sergilemektedir. Bu anlamda KÖR- algı fiili, kavramsal metafor değeriyle de öne çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca KÖR- algı fiili, Kutadgu Biligde gramerleşme süreçlerine de konu olabilmektedir. Özellikle tecrübet et- anlamıyla deneme kılınışı şeklinde adlandırabileceğimiz gramatikal bir gelişim, dikkati çekmektedir. Bütün bu gelişimler, GÖR- algı fiili üzerine yapılan tipoloji ve idrâk dilbilimi çalışmaları ışığında değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, F. (2022). Kör- To See in Kutadgu Bilig: Polysemy, Metaphor and Grammaticalization. Türkbilig, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 29, 59–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/620462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AIKHENVALD, A. Y. ve STORCH, A. (2013), “Linguistic Expression of Perception and Cognition” [Eds. Aikhenvald, A. Y. ve Storch, A.], Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, Leiden: Brill Publication: 1-45.
  2. ALM-ARVIUS, C. (1993), The English Verb See: A Study in Multiple Meaning, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. ARAT, R., R. (1947), Kutadgu Bilig I: Metin, Ankara: TDK Yayınları..., (1985), Kutadgu Bilig II: Tercüme, Ankara:
  3. TDK Yayınları.
  4. ATA, A. (1993), “Kutadgu Bilig Üzerinde Bir Düzenleme Denemesi: Kör mü? Kür mü?”, Türkoloji Dergisi, XI: 301-308.
  5. BARCELONA, A. (2000), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CULLEN, E., K. ve Van HORN, M., R (2011), “Brainstem Pathways and Premotor Control”, The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements [Eds. Liversedge, S., P., Gilchrist, I., D. ve Everling, S.]: 151-172.
  6. DEREKO, A. (2007), “Locke’da ve Lock-Öncesi Dil Felsefesinde Nesne-Ad İlişkisi”, Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi (SBARD), Sayı: 9: 97-120.
  7. EVANS, N., WILKINS, D. (2000), “In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extension of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages”, Language, 76: 546-592.
  8. GISBORNE, N. (2010), The Event Structure of Perception Verbs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. GÖKÇE, F. (2014), “Altay Dillerinde Ortak Bir Gramatikal Morfem {Zarf-Fiil Eki / Mastar Eki + GÖR-}Üzerine”, Türkbilig: Türkoloji Araştırmaları, 2014/ 27: 1-12..., (2013), Gramerleşme Teorisi ve Türkçe Fiil Birleşmeleri, Ankara: Türk Kültürünü Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları. IBARRETXE-ANTUÑANO, I. (1999) Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross-Linguistic Study, Phd Thesis, University of Edinburgh..., ve VALENZUELA-MANZANARES, J. (2010), “Language as a Complex Dynamic System: A View from Cognitive Linguistics”, Language as a Complex System [Eds. Bel-Enguix ve Jímenez-López], Cambridge Scholar Publishing: 3-39.
  10. JACKENDOFF, R., S. (1990),
  11. Semantic Structures, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  12. JOHNSON, C. (1999), “Metaphor vs. Conflation in the Acquisition of Polysemy”, [Eds. Hiraga, M. K., Sinha C., Wilcox, S.] Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cogntive Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company: 155-169.
  13. KNOWLES, M. ve MOON, R. (2006),
  14. Introducing Metaphor, London and New York: Routledge. KURŁOWICZ, J. (1965), “The Evolution of Grammatical Categories”, Diogenes, 51: 55-71.
  15. LAKOFF, G. (1993), “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”, Metaphor and Though