SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The Tendency of Turkish Pre-service Teachers' to Pose Word Problems

Çiğdem KILIÇ
Pages
163–178
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that participants had a tendency to pose result-centered problems (contextually inappropriate and irrelevant result-focused problems) and contextcentered problems (standard and non-standard word problems).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:: The aim of this study was to identify the problem posing tendency of preservice teachers (primary and mathematics) in structured problem posing situations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first sampling process, a total of 109 pre-service teachers participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that participants had a tendency to pose result-centered problems (contextually inappropriate and irrelevant result-focused problems) and contextcentered problems (standard and non-standard word problems).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

: The aim of this study was to identify the problem posing tendency of preservice teachers (primary and mathematics) in structured problem posing situations. Participants were selected using a two-step sampling process in order to prevent bias. In the first sampling process, a total of 109 pre-service teachers participated in the study. Of these participants, 48 were pre-service primary school mathematics teachers and 61 were preservice primary teachers who were in their sixth term of school. In the second sampling process, 10 volunteer participants were selected using purposeful sampling. It was found that participants had a tendency to pose result-centered problems (contextually inappropriate and irrelevant result-focused problems) and contextcentered problems (standard and non-standard word problems). In some cases, participants did not pose any word problems

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, Ç. (2022). The Tendency of Turkish Pre-service Teachers' to Pose Word Problems. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 163–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/620403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Barlow, A. T., & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 64-73.
  2. Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students' mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: an exploratory study, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,34(5), 719-737.
  3. Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2012). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students' learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1). Chen, L., Dooren, W.N., Chen, Q., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). An investigation on Chinese teachers’ realistic problem posing and problem solving ability and beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 919-948.
  4. Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Sriraman, B. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing process. ZDM, 37(3), 149-58.
  5. Fraenkel, J., R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill. Goldin, G. (2000). A scientific perspectives on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly, & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517-546).
  6. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Goodson-Espy, T. (2009). An exploration of preservice teachers’ creation and analysis of fraction multiplication word problems. In Swars, S. L., Stinson, D. W., & LemonsSmith, S. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1330-1338).
  7. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University. Hardman, F., Abd-Kadir, J., & Tibuhinda, A. (2012). Reforming teacher education in Tanzania.International Journal of Educational Development, 32(6), 826–834. Holmes, E. E. (1995). New directions in elementary school mathematics: Interactive teaching and learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill. Hunting, R. P. (1997). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research and practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 145-165.
  8. Inoue, N. (2005). The realistic reasons behind unrealistic solutions: The role of interpretive activity in word problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 15, 69-83.
  9. Işık, C. (2011). Conceptual analysis of multiplication and division in fractions posed by prservice elementary