Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of the effects of ketamine and propofol combined with remifentanil 1 µg kg kg-1 bolus on hemodynamic changes and intubating conditions during anesthetic induction

Anestezi indüksiyonunda 1 µg kg-1 bolus doz remifentanil ile birlikte kullanılan ketamin ve propofolün hemodinami ve entübasyon koşullarına etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
237–242
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, we concluded that 1 µg kg-1 bolus of remifentanil combined with ketamine during induction provides better hemodynamic stability, and similar intubating conditions, when comparing those of propofol-remifentanil induction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine and propofol combined with remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 bolus on hemodynamic changes and intubating conditions during anesthetic induction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee and patient informed consent, 44 patients, ASA physical status I, aged 20-56 years, who scheduled for elective surgery, were divided into two groups randomly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, we concluded that 1 µg kg-1 bolus of remifentanil combined with ketamine during induction provides better hemodynamic stability, and similar intubating conditions, when comparing those of propofol-remifentanil induction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine and propofol combined with remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 bolus on hemodynamic changes and intubating conditions during anesthetic induction. After obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee and patient informed consent, 44 patients, ASA physical status I, aged 20-56 years, who scheduled for elective surgery, were divided into two groups randomly. After administration of a bolus dose of remifentanil 1 µg kg-1, patients in group K (n=22) received ketamine 1-1.5 mg kg-1, group P (n=22) received propofol 1.5-2 mg kg-1. The trachea was intubated 3 minutes after administration of vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 in all patients. The quality of intubation was scored as perfect, good and poor. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1-1.5 % and 50 % nitrous oxide in oxygen, and if necessary remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 was administered. Systolic blood pressure (SAP), diastolic blood pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before (control) and after induction, before and 1, 3 and 5 min after placement of the tracheal tube, 1 min after surgical incision and every 5 min up to 30 minutes. Until surgical incision, SAP, DAP, MAP and HR were higher in group K than group P. There were no significance between groups regarding intubation scores and additional remifentanil requirements. As a result, we concluded that 1 µg kg-1 bolus of remifentanil combined with ketamine during induction provides better hemodynamic stability, and similar intubating conditions, when comparing those of propofol-remifentanil induction.

Özet

Bu çalışmada; anestezi indüksiyonunda 1 µg kg-1 bolus doz remifentanil ile birlikte kullanılan ketamin ve propofolün hemodinami ve entübasyon koşullarına etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Etik Kurul ve hasta onayından sonra elektif cerrahi planlanan, ASA I, 20-56 yaş arası 44 hasta rasgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 bolus doz uygulandıktan sonra 1. gruba (grup K, n=22) 1-1.5 mg kg-1 ketamin, 2. gruba (grup P, n=22) ise 1.5-2 mg kg-1 propofol verildi. Tüm hastalar 0.1 mg kg-1 vekuronyum uygulanmasından 3 dk sonra entübe edildi. Entübasyon koşulları mükemmel, iyi ve zayıf olarak skorlandı. İdamede % 50 O2-N2O ve % 1-1.5 sevofluran, gerektiğinde remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 uygulandı. Sistolik arter basıncı (SAB), diyastolik arter basıncı (DAB), ortalama arter basıncı (OAB) ve kalp atım hızı (KAH) indüksiyondan önce (kontrol) ve sonra, entübasyondan önce, entübasyondan 1, 3 ve 5 dk sonra, insizyondan 1 dk sonra ve 5 dk ara ile 30 dakika süresince kaydedildi. SAB, DAB, OAB ve KAH değerleri insizyona kadar grup K'da grup P'ye göre anlamlı olarak yüksekti. Grupların entübasyon skorları ve ek remifentanil ihtiyaçları arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. Sonuç olarak, propofol-remifentanil indüksiyonu ile karşılaştırıldığında, 1 µg kg-1 bolus doz remifentanil ile birlikte kullanılan ketamin indüksiyonunun daha iyi hemodinamik stabilite sağladığı ve entübasyon koşullarının benzer olduğu kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBİLEK, S., DOĞAN, Z., TOĞAL, T., ÇİÇEK, M., ERSOY, M. Ö., GÜLHAŞ, N. (2022). Comparison of the effects of ketamine and propofol combined with remifentanil 1 µg kg kg-1 bolus on hemodynamic changes and intubating conditions during anesthetic induction. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 5, 237–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/620234

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, el al: A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective İnpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:279-285
  2. Song D, Whitten CW, White PF: Use of remifentanil during anesthetic induction::i comparison with fentanyl in ihe ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:734-6
  3. Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al: A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52(4): 07-317
  4. Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, Cagney B, Rowbotham DJ: Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80:467-9
  5. Taittonen MT, Kirvela OA, Aantaa R, Kanto JH: The effect of clonidine or midazolam premedication on perioperative responses during ketamine anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:161-7
  6. Katz RI, Levy A, Slepian B, Sobel B, Lagasse RS: Haemodynamic stability and ketamine-alfentanil anaesthetic induction. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:702-6
  7. Granry JC, Dube L, Turroques H, Conreux F: Ketamine: new uses for an old drug. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2000; 13(3):299-302
  8. Raedcr JC, Stenseth LB: Ketamine: a new look at an old drug. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2000; 13(4):463-8
  9. Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, et al: Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40(l):59-74
  10. Wilhelm W, Biedler A, Huppert A, et al: Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19:350-6
  11. Hans P, Brichant,JF, Hubert B, Dewandre PY, Lamy M: Influence of induction of anaesthesia on intubating one minute after rocuronium administration: comparison of ketamine and thiopentone. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:276-9
  12. Furuya A, Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, et ai: Intravenous ketamine attenuates arterial pressure changes during the induction of anaesthesia with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18(2):88-92
  13. O'Hare R, McAtamney D, Mirakhur RK, Hughes D, Carabine U: Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82(2):283-5
  14. White PF: Comparative evaluation of intravenous agents for rapid sequence induction- thiopental, ketamine, and midazolam.Anesthesiology 1982;57:279-284. 15.Braka A, Sayyid S, Assaf B: Thio