Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 8

Comparison of maintenance and recovery characteristics of dexflurane and sevoflurane in children

Çocuklarda Desfluran-Sevofluran Anestezisinin İdame ve Derlenme Üzerine Olan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
415–421
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recovery time was significantly shorter in the desflurane group than sevoflurane group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane were compared for maintenance of anaesthesia in short-term surgery of children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifty children, 4-12 years old were studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recovery time was significantly shorter in the desflurane group than sevoflurane group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the characteristics of desflurane and sevoflurane were compared for maintenance of anaesthesia in short-term surgery of children. Fifty children, 4-12 years old were studied. Thirty minutes prior to the induction of anaesthesia, all patients received 0.5 mg kg-1 midazolam orally. They were randomly assigned to receive 6-7 % desfurane (group I) and 2-2.5 % sevoflurane (group II) with 60 % nitrous oxide in oxygen for maintenance of anaesthesia. For anaesthesia induction all patients were given 2-2.5 mg kg-1 propofol, 10 µg kg-1 alfentanil and 0.1 mg kg-1 cisatracurium and after two minutes all patients were intubated. Before surgery, patients received 20 mg kg-1 paracetamol rectally for postoperative analgesia. Dexamethasone 150 µg kg-1 was given to reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure and heat rate were measured: before induction, after induction and during intubation, 5, 10, 20 minutes afte r surgery and at the end of anaesthesia. At the end of the operation extubation and recovery times were determined. Agitation was evaluated by using the three point score. Hemodynamic parameters were satisfactorily maintained within ± 30 % of baseline values in both groups. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the desflurane group than sevoflurane group (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada çocuklarda kısa süreli cerrahi girişimlerde anestezi idamesinde kullanılan desfluran ve sevofluranın özellikleri karşılaştırıldı. Yaşları 4-12 olan 50 çocuk çalışmaya alındı. Anestezi indüksiyonundan 30 dk önce 0.5 mg kg-1 midazolam oral uygulandı. Anestezi indüksiyonu için 2-2.5 µg kg-1 propofol, 10 µg kg-1 alfentanil ve 0.1 mg kg-1 sisatrakuryum verildikten sonra hastalar randomize olarak iki gruba ayrıldı ve anestezi idamesi için % 60 N2O ile birlikte % 6-7 desfluran (grup I) ve 2-2.5 % sevofluran (grup II) uygulandı. Cerrahi başlamadan önce, hastalara postoperatif analjezi için 20 mg kg-1 parasetamol rektal uygulandı. Postoperataif bulantıkusma insidansını azaltmak için 150 µg kg-1 deksametazon verildi. Sistolik arter basıncı, diyastolik arter basıncı, ortalama arter basıncı ve kalp atım hızı indüksiyon öncesi, indüksiyon ve entübasyon sonrası, cerrahi başladıktan 5., 10. ve 20. dk. sonra ve anestezi sonunda kaydedildi. Anestezik ajanlar ameliyat bitiminde kesildi. Ekstübasyon ve derlenme zamanı kaydedildi. Ajitasyon üç puanlı skorlama ile değerlendirildi. Her iki grupta da hemodinamik parametreler bazal değerlerin ± % 30'unda seyretti. Derlenme zamanı desfluran grubunda daha kısa bulundu (p0.05). Her iki grupta postoperatif kusma insidansında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç olarak çocuklarda propofol indüksiyonu sonrası desfluran ve sevofluranın anestezi idamesinde güvenle kullanılabileceği kanısındayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, S., ÖKESLİ, S., TAVLAN, A., TUNCER, S., REİSLİ, R., SARKILAR, G. (2022). Comparison of maintenance and recovery characteristics of dexflurane and sevoflurane in children. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 8, 415–421. https://ajindex.com/articles/620232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Grundmann U, Eichner A, Wilhelm W, Sunt R: Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia. Acta Anaesth Scand 1998; 42:845-850
  2. Loop T, Priebe HJ: Recovery after anesthesia with remifentanyl combinend with propofol, desflurane or sevoflurane for otorhinolaryngeal surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:123-129
  3. Lerman J: Sevoflurane in Pediatric Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:4-10
  4. Taylor RH, Lerman J: Induction, maintenance and recovery characteristics of desflurane in infant and children. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:6-13
  5. Esener Z: Bebeklerde Anestezi. Anestezi Dergisi 1993; 1:49-54
  6. Aldrete PJ, Kroulik D: Postanestetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49:924-934
  7. Davis PJ, Cohen IT, McGowan FX Jr Latta K: Recovery characteristics of desflurane versus halothane for maintenance of anesthesia İn paediatric ambulatory patients. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:298-302
  8. Güleç S, Tanrıverdi B, Büyükkıdan B, Oral N: Pediyatrik olgularda bupivakain, morfin kombinasyonu ile yapılan kaudal analjezinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 1997; 25:471-473
  9. Lerman J: Sevoflurane and desflurane in paediatric patients. Curr Opin Anaesth 1993; 6:527-531
  10. Maurice S, Zwass MD, Dennis M: Induction and maintenance characteristics of anesthesia with desflurane and nitrous oxide in infants and children. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:373-378
  11. Black TE, Kay B, Healy TE: Reducing the haemodinamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. A comparison of alfen-tanil with fentanil. Anaesthesia 1984; 39:883-887
  12. Tarazi EM, Philip BK: A comparison of recovery after sevoflurane or desfturane in ambulatory anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10:272-277
  13. Yasuda N, Targ A, Eger El: Solubility of desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane and halothane İn human tissues. Anesth Analg 1989; 69:370-373
  14. Eger El: Desflurane. Critical drug appraisal. An overview of its properties. Anesthesiology Review 1993; 3:87-92
  15. Jones RM, Cashman JN: Kinetics and potency of desflurane in volunteers. Anesth Analg 1990; 70:3-7
  16. Claeys MA, Gept E: Hacmodynamıcs changes during anaesthesia induced and maintained with propofol. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60:3-9
  17. Shafer A, Dose VA, Shafer SL, White PF: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodinamics of propofol infusion during general anesthesia. Anesthsiology 1988; 69:348-356
  18. Lodes U: Total intravenous anesthsia and balanced anesthsi