Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on hemodynamics recovery in supratentorial space occupying lesions

Supratentoriyal yer kaplayan oluşumlarda remifentanil ve fentanilin hemodinami ve postoperatif erken dönem uyanıklılık üzeirne etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
302–309
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The times of to spontaneous breathing, eye opening with verbal command, extubation, modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 and adverse effects were also recorded.The mean arterial pressure at intubation, skin incision, burr hole opening, removal of bone flap, replacement of bone flap, at the end of surgery and the heart rate at skin incision, replacement of bone flap were found to be significantly higher in the fentanyl group when compared with the remifentanil group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we aimed to compare of effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative return of consciousness following the removal of supratentorial space occupying lesions.After Research Ethics’ Committee approval and written informed consent from patients, 25 ASA physical status I-III adult patients were randomized into two groups Group I (n= 12) received remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 for induction and 0.15 µg kg-1 min-1 for maintenance and Group II (n=13) received fentanyl 2 µg kg-1 for induction and 0.03 µg kg-1 min-1 for maintenance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In both groups intubation was done following vecuronium 0.1 µg mg kg-1 and propofol 2 µg mg kg-1 and anaesthesia was maintained with propofol 50-200 µg kg-1 min-1, O2 40%, N2O 60 %.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The times of to spontaneous breathing, eye opening with verbal command, extubation, modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 and adverse effects were also recorded.The mean arterial pressure at intubation, skin incision, burr hole opening, removal of bone flap, replacement of bone flap, at the end of surgery and the heart rate at skin incision, replacement of bone flap were found to be significantly higher in the fentanyl group when compared with the remifentanil group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare of effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative return of consciousness following the removal of supratentorial space occupying lesions.After Research Ethics’ Committee approval and written informed consent from patients, 25 ASA physical status I-III adult patients were randomized into two groups Group I (n= 12) received remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 for induction and 0.15 µg kg-1 min-1 for maintenance and Group II (n=13) received fentanyl 2 µg kg-1 for induction and 0.03 µg kg-1 min-1 for maintenance. In both groups intubation was done following vecuronium 0.1 µg mg kg-1 and propofol 2 µg mg kg-1 and anaesthesia was maintained with propofol 50-200 µg kg-1 min-1, O2 40%, N2O 60 %. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded one minute after the basal measurement, entubation intubation, application of skull pins, skin incision, burr hole opening, removal of bone flap, replacement of bone flap, closure of skin and at the end of surgery. The times of to spontaneous breathing, eye opening with verbal command, extubation, modified Aldrete score ≥ 9 and adverse effects were also recorded.The mean arterial pressure at intubation, skin incision, burr hole opening, removal of bone flap, replacement of bone flap, at the end of surgery and the heart rate at skin incision, replacement of bone flap were found to be significantly higher in the fentanyl group when compared with the remifentanil group (p

Özet

Bu araştırmada supratentoriyal yer kaplayan oluşumlar nedeniyle kraniyotomi yapılan hastalarda, remifentanil ve fentanilin, intraoperatif hemodinami ve postoperatif erken dönem uyanıklılık üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Etik kurul izni ve yazılı hasta onamından sonra, ASA I-III grubunda, elektif kraniyotomi planlanan 25 erişkin hasta rasgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. İndüksiyonda R grubuna (n=12) 1 mg kg-1, idamede 0.15 mg kg-1 dk-1 remifentanil, F grubuna (n=13) indüksiyonda 2 mg kg-1, idamede 0.03 mg kg-1 dk-1 fentanil uygulandı. Her iki grupta vekuronyum 0.1 mg kg-1 ve propofol 2 mg kg-1 ile entübasyon gerçekleştirilerek, idame propofol 50-200 mg kg-1 dk-1, % 40 O2 ve % 60 N2O ile sağlandı. Bazal, entübasyon, çivili başlık takılması, cerrahi kesi, burr-hole açılması, kemik flep kaldırılması, kemik flep yerleştirilmesi, cilt kapatılması ve cerrahi sonu dönemlerinden 1 dk. sonra ortalama arter basıncı ve kalp atım hızı değerleri; spontan solunumun başlama, solunumun yeterli hale gelme, komutla göz açma, ekstübasyon ve modifiye Aldrete skorunun ≥ 9 ulaşma süreleri ve yan etkiler kaydedildi.Fentanil grubunda, entübasyon, cerrahi kesi, burr-hole açılması, kemik flep kaldırılması, kemik flep yerleştirilmesi ve cerrahi sonu ortalama arter basıncı ile cerrahi kesi ve kemik flep yerleştirilmesi kalp atım hızı, remifentanil grubuna göre anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARKAN, A., ERBAYRAKTAR, S., ÇELİK, M., KORKMAZ, H., GÜNENÇ, F., KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, S., İYİLİKÇİ, L. (2022). Comparison of effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on hemodynamics recovery in supratentorial space occupying lesions. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 302–309. https://ajindex.com/articles/620180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Geszttesi Z, Mootz BL, White PF. The use of remifentanil infusion for hemodynamic control during intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg 1999
  2. Warner DS. Experience with remifentanil in neurosurgical patients. Anesth Analg 1999
  3. Warner DS, Hindman BJ, Todd MM, et al. Intracranial pressure and hemodynamic effects of remifentanil versus alfentanil in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Anesth Analg 1996
  4. Glass PSA, Hardrnan D, Kamiyama Y, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid: remifentanil (G187084B). Anesth Analg 1993
  5. Westmoreland CL, Hoke JF, Sebel PS, Hug CC, Muir KT. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil (G187084B) and its major metabolite (G190291) in patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 1993
  6. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 1997
  7. Baker KZ, Ostapkovich N, Sigti MB, et al. Cerebral blood flow reactivity remains intact during remifentanil / N2O anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1997
  8. Ostapkovich ND, Baker KZ, Fogartymack P, et al. Cerebral blood flow and CO2 reactivity is similar during remifentanil / N2O and fentanyl / N2O anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998
  9. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995
  10. Issioui T, Klein KV, White PF et al. The efficacy of premedication with celecoxib and acetaminophen in preventing pain after otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2002
  11. Albrecht Sven, Schuttler J, Yarmush J. Postoperative pain management after intraoperative remifentanil. Anesth Analg 1999
  12. Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Sanıra SK, et al. A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg 2000
  13. 163469. 13.Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE, et al. intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors. Anesthesiology 2003
  14. Glass PSA, Gan TJ, Howell S. A rewiew of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg 1999
  15. Coles JP, Leary TS, Monteiro JN, et al. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy: a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2000
  16. 12(1): 15-20. 16.Todd MM, Warner