Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Intravenous sedation for computerized tomography in pediatric patients : Thiopentone versus propofol

Pediyatrik olgularda bilgisayarlı tomografi uygulamalarında intravenöz sedasyon için tiyopental ile propofolün karşılaştırılması

Pages
33–39
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No severe respir atory depression or desaturation (SpO2

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study we aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of thiopentone and propofol to provide sedation in children undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scanning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eighty ASA I-II children 2-8 years old, scheduled for CT scanning were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No severe respir atory depression or desaturation (SpO2
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study we aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of thiopentone and propofol to provide sedation in children undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scanning. Eighty ASA I-II children 2-8 years old, scheduled for CT scanning were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups regarding the use of thiopentone or propofol for sedation. In group T, patients were given 2 mg $kg^{-1}$ thiopentone intravenously as bolus doses. In group P, patients received 1 mg $kg^{-1}$ propofol and then propofol infusion was started at 4-8 mg $kg^{-1}$ $hr^{-1}$. The patients' peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and noninvasive blood pressure were monitored during the procedure. After completion of the CT scanning, the cases were evaluated for recovery criteria and for side effects before discharging. We did not find any significant differences between the two groups regarding mean blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and respiratory rate during the CT scanning (p>0.05). No severe respir atory depression or desaturation (SpO2

Özet

Çalışmamızda pediyatrik bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) çekiminde sedasyon sağlamak amacıyla rutin olarak kullandığımız tiyopentali propofol ile sedasyonun etkinliği ve güvenilirliği açısından karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. BT çekimi uygulanacak 2-8 yaşları arasındaki, ASA I-II 80 pediyatrik olgu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bu olgular sedasyon amacıyla tiyopental veya propofolün uygulanacağı iki eşit gruba rasgele olarak ayrıldılar. Grup T'deki olgulara 2 mg $kg^{-1}$ İV tiyopental bolusları, Grup P'deki olgulara 1 mg $kg^{-1}$ İV propofol boluslarını takiben 4-8 mg $kg^{-1}$ $sa^{-1}$ propofol infüzyonu uygulandı. Olgulara çekim süresince nabız oksimetresi, solunum sayısı (inspeksiyon) ve noninvaziv kan basıncı monitörizasyonu uygulandı. Çekim sonrası olgular hastaneden taburcu edilene kadar derlenme kriterleri ve yan etkiler açısından değerlendirildiler. Olguların çekim sırasında ölçülen ortalama arteriyel kan basınçları, kalp atım hızları, periferik oksijen satürasyonları ve solunum sayıları açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05). Hiçbir olguda ciddi solunum depresyonu veya desatürasyon (SpO2

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKER, G., GÜLER, E., GURBET, A., TÜFEK, A., ÖZCAN, B. (2022). Intravenous sedation for computerized tomography in pediatric patients : Thiopentone versus propofol. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 33–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/620173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hubbard AM, Markowitz RI, Kimmel B, Kroger M, Bartko MB. Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:3-6
  2. Bloomfield EL, Masaryk TJ, Caplin A, et al. Intravenous sedation for MR imaging of the brain and spine in children: pentobarbital versus propofol. Radiology 1993; 186:93-97
  3. Egelhoff JC, Ball WS, Koch BL, Parks TD. Safety and efficacy of sedation in children using a structured sedation program. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1259- 1262
  4. Karian VE, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, Connor L, Maason KP. Sedation for pediatric radiological procedures: analysis of potential causes of sedation failure and paradoxical reactions. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:869-873
  5. Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Karian VE, et al. Sedatives used in pediatric imaging: comparison of IV pentobarbital with IV pentobarbital with midazolam added. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:427-430
  6. Cook BA, Bass JW, Nomizu S, Alexander ME. Sedation of children for technical procedures: current standart of practice. Clin Pediatr 1992; 31:137-142
  7. Pereira JK, Burrows PE, Richards HM, Chuang SH, Babyn PS. Comparison of sedation regimens for pediatric outpatient CT. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23:341-344
  8. Miller R, Leno T. Advances in pediatric emergency department procedures. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1991; 9:639-654
  9. Karian VE, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, et al. The development of a pediatric radiology sedation program. Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32:348-353
  10. James R, Glen JB. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and preliminary stucture-activity considerations of a series of alkylphenols as intravenous anesthetic agents. J Med Chem 1980; 23:1350-1357
  11. Valtonen M. Anaesthesia for computerised tomography of the brain in children: a comparison of propofol and thiopentone. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33:170-173
  12. Martin LD, Pasternak LR, Pudimat MA. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in pediatric patients outside the operating room. Anesth Analg 1992; 74:609-612
  13. Wilson E, David A, Mackenzie N, Grant IS. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: Comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64:48-52
  14. Keeter S, Benator RM, Weinberg SM, Hartenberg MA. Sedation in pediatric CT: national survey of current practice. Radiology 1990; 175:745-752
  15. Frush DP, Bisset GS. Sedation of children in radiology: time to wake up. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:913-914
  16. Strain JD, Campbell JB, Harvey LA, Foley LC. IV Nembutal: safe sedation for children undergoin