Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Influence of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia incidences in patients receiving TPN

TPN uygulanan olgularda antiseptik kaplı santral venöz kateterlerin kateter kolonizasyonu ve kateterle ilişkili bakteremi oranlarına etkisi

Pages
321–327
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The catheter-related bacteremia was found in 2 patients (% 15.1) (11.2/1,000 catheter days) of group CSS-SVK and 1 patients (% 5.9) (5.9/1,000 catheter days) of group Standard-SVK.Conclusion: We thought that the use of antiseptic-impregnated catheters has no effect on the incidence of both catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia in this study group however it's been concluded that the results has to be investigated in larger study groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Our study was performed to evaluate the impact of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters (CSS-SVC) on the incidence of colonization and catheter-related bacteremia in critically ill patients receiving TPN.Materials and methods: Triple-lumen CSS-SVC to 13 patients receiving TPN and standard triple-lumen central venous catheter (Standard-SVC) to 17 patients were inserted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:SVCs were removed when no longer needed or when clinical signs of sepsis were observed.Results: Duration of catheterization and use of TPN, the catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia rates were similar for two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The catheter-related bacteremia was found in 2 patients (% 15.1) (11.2/1,000 catheter days) of group CSS-SVK and 1 patients (% 5.9) (5.9/1,000 catheter days) of group Standard-SVK.Conclusion: We thought that the use of antiseptic-impregnated catheters has no effect on the incidence of both catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia in this study group however it's been concluded that the results has to be investigated in larger study groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Our study was performed to evaluate the impact of chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters (CSS-SVC) on the incidence of colonization and catheter-related bacteremia in critically ill patients receiving TPN.Materials and methods: Triple-lumen CSS-SVC to 13 patients receiving TPN and standard triple-lumen central venous catheter (Standard-SVC) to 17 patients were inserted. SVCs were removed when no longer needed or when clinical signs of sepsis were observed.Results: Duration of catheterization and use of TPN, the catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia rates were similar for two groups. The catheter colonization was determined in 6 patients (% 46.2) (33.5/1,000 catheter days) of group CSS-SVK and 5 patients (% 29.4) (29.8/1,000 catheter days) of group Standard-SVK. The catheter-related bacteremia was found in 2 patients (% 15.1) (11.2/1,000 catheter days) of group CSS-SVK and 1 patients (% 5.9) (5.9/1,000 catheter days) of group Standard-SVK.Conclusion: We thought that the use of antiseptic-impregnated catheters has no effect on the incidence of both catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia in this study group however it's been concluded that the results has to be investigated in larger study groups.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamız, klorheksidin ve gümüş sülfadiyazin kaplı santral venöz kateterlerin (KGS-SVK) TPN uygulanan kritik olgularda kolonizasyon ve kateterle ilişkili bakteremi oranı üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: TPN alan 13 olguda üç lümenli KGS-SVK, 17 olguda ise standart üç lümenli santral venöz kateter (Standart- SVK) uygulandı. SVK'ler gereksinim kalmadığında veya sepsisin klinik bulguları gözlendiğinde çıkarıldı.Bulgular: Kateterizasyon ve TPN kullanım süreleri, kateter kolonizasyonu ve kateterle ilişkili bakteremi oranları iki grup için de benzer bulundu. Kateter kolonizasyonu, KGS-SVK grubunda 6 olguda (% 46.2) (33.5/1,000 kateter günü), Standart-SVK grubunda 5 olguda (% 29.4) (29.8/1,000 kateter günü) saptandı. Kateterle ilişkili bakteremi ise, KGS-SVK grubunda 2 olguda (% 15.1) (11.2/1,000 kateter günü), Standart-SVK grubunda 1 olguda (% 5.9) (5.9/1,000 kateter günü) gözlendi.Sonuç: Bu çalışma grubunda antiseptik kaplı kateter kullanımının kateter kolonizasyonu ve kateterle ilişkili bakteremi oranları üzerine etkisinin olmadığı görülmekle birlikte daha fazla olguda araştırma gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHVECİ, F., OSMA, S., KUTLAY, O., KAYA, F. N. (2022). Influence of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia incidences in patients receiving TPN. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 321–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/620159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Saint S, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA. The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial central venous cat heter-related infection: are antimicrobial catheters useful? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:375-380
  2. Cooper GL, Schiller AL, Hopkins CC. Possible role of capillary action in pathogenesis of experimental catheterassociated dermal tunnel infections. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:8-12
  3. Collin GR. Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Chest 1999; 115:1632-1640
  4. Modak SM, Sampath L. Development and evaluation of a new polyurethane central venous antiseptic catheter: reducing central venous catheter infections. Complications Surg 1992; 11:23-29
  5. Heard SO, Wagle M, Vijayakunıar E, et al. Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:81-87
  6. Sheng WH, Ko WJ, Wang JT, et al. Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 38:1-5
  7. Hannan M, Juste RN, Umasanker S, et al. Antisepticbonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation.Anaesthesia 1999; 54:868-872
  8. Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:257-266
  9. Veenstra DL, Saint S, Saha S, Lumley T, Sullivan SD. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection:a meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 281:261-267
  10. Cresi DL, Albrecht RM, Volkers PA, Scholten DJ. Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheterrelated infection and sepsis. Am Surg 1996; 62:641-646
  11. Pemberton LB, Ross V, Cuddy P, et al. No difference in catheter sepsis between standard and antiseptic central venous catheters: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 1996; 131:986-989
  12. Logghe C, Van Ossel C, D'Hoore W, et al. Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infections in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Infect 1997; 37:145-156
  13. Savage AP, Picard M, Hopkins CC, Malt RA. Complications and survival of multilumen cen