Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

The effects of different doses of alfentanil and remifentanil on the intubating conditions without the use of muscle relaxants

Değişik dozlarda alfentanil ve remifentanilin kas gevşeticisiz endotrakeal entübasyon koşullarına etkileri

Pages
203–208
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In groups R1 and R1.5 heart rates were significantly lower compared to control (p< 0.01).Conclusions: After propofol induction, remifentanil with 2 MAC sevoflurane and % 70 nitrous oxide decreases cough as well as hemodynamic responses to intubation done without neuromuscular blockade.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, we compared the effects of alfentanil (10 µg kg-1, 15 µg kg-1) and remifentanil (1 µg kg-1, 1,5 µg kg-1) on intubating conditions after propofol induction while breathing 2 MAC sevoflurane and % 70 N2O.Materials and Methods: Seventy fifth patients, aged 20-60 years, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anesthesia was induced with 1.5-2 mg kg-1 propofol.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In groups R1 and R1.5 heart rates were significantly lower compared to control (p< 0.01).Conclusions: After propofol induction, remifentanil with 2 MAC sevoflurane and % 70 nitrous oxide decreases cough as well as hemodynamic responses to intubation done without neuromuscular blockade.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we compared the effects of alfentanil (10 µg kg-1, 15 µg kg-1) and remifentanil (1 µg kg-1, 1,5 µg kg-1) on intubating conditions after propofol induction while breathing 2 MAC sevoflurane and % 70 N2O.Materials and Methods: Seventy fifth patients, aged 20-60 years, scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=15). Anesthesia was induced with 1.5-2 mg kg-1 propofol. Patients were ventilated with 2 MAC sevoflurane, % 70 N2O in oxygen via face mask. Groups C, A10, A15, R1, R1.5 received 1,5 mg kg-1 succinylcholine, 10 µg kg-1 alfentanil, 15 µg kg-1 alfentanil, 1 µg kg-1 remifentanil and 1.5 µg kg-1 remifentanil respectively. Endotracheal intubation was performed at 90th seconds following. Ease of ventilation, jaw relaxation, position of vocal cords, Cormack-Lehane classification, and patients' response to intubation and inflation of endotracheal tube cuff were assessed.Results: In group A10, Cormack-Lehane classification was significantly higher and vocal cords were mobile compared to other groups (p< 0.05). Patients' cough response to intubation and inflation of endotracheal tube cuff were significantly higher in group A10 compared to groups C, R1 and R1.5 and in group A15 compared to groups C and R1.5 (p < 0.01). In all opioid groups, mean arterial pressures after intubation were significantly lower compared to control (p< 0.05). In groups R1 and R1.5 heart rates were significantly lower compared to control (p< 0.01).Conclusions: After propofol induction, remifentanil with 2 MAC sevoflurane and % 70 nitrous oxide decreases cough as well as hemodynamic responses to intubation done without neuromuscular blockade.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, propofol indüksiyonundan sonra, 2 MAC sevofluran ve % 70 azot protoksit ile birlikte uygulanan alfentanil (10 µg kg-1, 15 µg kg-1) ve remifentanilin (1 µg kg-1, 1,5 µg kg-1) entübasyon koşullarına etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Elektif operasyon geçirecek 20-60 yaş arası 75 hasta randomize olarak 5 gruba ayrıldı (n=15). 1.5-2 mg kg-1 iv propofol enjeksiyonu sonrasında hastalar yüz maskesi ile 2 MAC sevofluran, % 70 N2O oksijen içinde havalandırılmaya başlandı. Grup K'ye 1,5 mg kg-1 süksinilkolin (kontrol grubu); grup A10'a 10 µg kg-1, grup A15'e 15 µg kg-1 alfentanil; grup R1'e 1 µg kg-1 ve grup R1,5'a 1,5 µgkg-1 remifentanil i.v. uygulandı. İndüksiyondan 90 sn. sonra entübasyon işlemi gerçekleştirildi. Maske ile sağlanan ventilasyonun kolaylığı, entübasyon sırasında çenenin kas tonusu, vokal kord pozisyonu, Cormack-Lehane sınıflandırması, hastanın entübasyona ve tüpün balonunun şişirilmesine yanıtı değerlendirildi.Bulgular: A10 grubunda Cormack-Lehane sınıflandırması diğer gruplardan belirgin yüksek ve vokal kordlar hareketli olarak saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AY, B., GÖĞÜŞ, F. Y., UMUROĞLU, T., DOĞAN, İ. V., USLUER, A. (2022). The effects of different doses of alfentanil and remifentanil on the intubating conditions without the use of muscle relaxants. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 203–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/620158

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baraka A. The unexpected difficult intubation. Middle East J Anesthesiol 1988; 9:475-478
  2. Morgan GE. Airway Management, In: Morgan GE, Michael MS, Murray MJ (Eds.) Clinical Anesthesiology, 3rd Edition. United States of America, McGrawJtill, 2002; 59-85
  3. Ouedraogo N, Marthan R, Roux E. The effects of propofol and etomidate on airway contractility in chronically hypoxic rats. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1035-1041
  4. Scheller MS, Zornow MH, Saidman LJ. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil. Anesth Analg 1992; 75:788-793
  5. Beck GN, Masterson GR, Richards J, Bunting P. Comparison of intubation following propofol and alfentanil with intubation following thiopentone and suxamethonium. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:876-880
  6. Klemola UM, Mennander S, Saarnivaara L. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Acta Ana- esthesiol Scand 2000; 44:465-469
  7. McNeil IA, Culbert B, Russell I. Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 micrograms kg-1 or 4 micrograms kg-1. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:623-625
  8. Collins L, Prentice J, Vaghadia H. Tracheal intubation of outpatients with and without muscle relaxants. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47:427-432
  9. Grant S, Noble S, Woods A, Murdoch J, Davidson A. Assessment of intubating conditions in adults after induction with propofol and varying doses of remifentanil. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 540-543
  10. Alexander R, Booth J, Olufolabi AJ, El-Moalem HE, Glass PS. Comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil or suxamethonium following propofol anaesthesia for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:1032-1036
  11. Wong AK, Teoh GS. Intubation without muscle relaxant: an alternative technique for rapid tracheal intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24:224-230
  12. Erhan E, Uğur G, Alper I, Günüşen I, Özyar B. Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20:37-43
  13. Cengiz M, Ganidağh S, Ölmez G. Kas gevşeticisiz endotrakeal entübasyon: propofol indüksiyonunu takiben uygulanan üç farklı remifentanil dozunun karşılaştırılması. JTARDD 2004; 32:356-361
  14. Erhan E, Uğur G, Günüşen I, Özyar B. Propofol- not thiopental or etomidate- with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade.Can J Anaesth. 2003; 50