Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5

Caudal block in paediatric surgery: A retrospective survey in 2262 patients

Çocuklarda kaudal blok: 2262 olgunun geriye dönük incelenmesi

Pages
388–394
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were statistically significant differences regarding total complications, and subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous injection rates comparing 1-2 years residents with 2-3 years and 3-4 years residents and staff anaesthesiologists (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The caudal block is a common regional anaesthetic techniques in infant and children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We reviewed the anaesthesia records of 2262 paediatric patients in whom caudal block was performed between June 1995-May 2004 in our institution and describe the associated morbidity and complications.Results:Anaesthesia was induced with inhalation agents in 1633 patients, and intravenous agents in 629 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were statistically significant differences regarding total complications, and subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous injection rates comparing 1-2 years residents with 2-3 years and 3-4 years residents and staff anaesthesiologists (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The caudal block is a common regional anaesthetic techniques in infant and children. Limited data regard complications have been reported. We reviewed the anaesthesia records of 2262 paediatric patients in whom caudal block was performed between June 1995-May 2004 in our institution and describe the associated morbidity and complications.Results:Anaesthesia was induced with inhalation agents in 1633 patients, and intravenous agents in 629 patients. Caudal blocks were obtained by administering 1 mL kg-1 of 0.25 % bupivacaine in 1563 patients, 0.25 % bupivacaine and 1 % prilocaine in 400 patients, 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamine in 61 patients, 0.25 % bupivacaine and 1 µg kg-1 fentanil in 106 patients, and 0.2 % ropivacaine in 132 patients. Complications rates were not different between patients over 10 kg and ?10 kg. There were statistically significant differences regarding total complications, and subcutaneous infiltration and intravenous injection rates comparing 1-2 years residents with 2-3 years and 3-4 years residents and staff anaesthesiologists (p

Özet

Amaç: Kaudal blok, infant ve çocuklarda sık kullanılan bölgesel anestezi yöntemlerinden biridir. Fakat komplikasyon oranları hakkında sınırlı bilgi bulunmaktadır. Haziran 1995-Mayıs 2004 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde kaudal blok uygulanan 2262 pediyatrik hastanın anestezi kayıtlarını inceleyerek, morbidite ve komplikasyonları araştırmayı amaçladık.Bulgular: Anestezi indüksiyonu hastaların 1.633'nde inhalasyon, 629'unda intravenöz ajanlarla yapılmıştır. Toplam volüm 1 mL kg-1 olacak şekilde hastaların 1.563'üne % 0.25 bupivakain, 400'üne % 0.25 bupivakain ve % 1 prilokain, 61'ine % 0,25 bupivakain ve 0.5 mg kg-1 ketamin, 106'sına % 0.25 bupivakain ve 1 µg kg-1 fentanil, 132'sine % 0.2 ropivakain verilmiştir. Komplikasyon oranları açısından 10 kg. ve altındaki hastalarla, 10 kg.'ın üstündeki hastalar arasında fark bulunmazken, toplam komplikasyon oranları ve ciltaltı infiltrasyon açısından 1-2 yıl asistanı-2-3 yıl asistanı, 1-2 yıl asistanı-3-4 yıl asistanı, 1-2 yıl asistanı ve uzman arasındaki fark anlamlıydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLGER, H., KÖROĞLU, A., TOPRAK, H. İ., BEGEÇ, Z., DURMUŞ, M., ERSOY, M. Ö. (2022). Caudal block in paediatric surgery: A retrospective survey in 2262 patients. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5, 388–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/620153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ansermıno M, Basu R, Vandebeek C, Montgomery C. Nonopioid additives to local anaesthetics for caudal blockade in children: a systematic review. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13:561-573
  2. Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: A one-year prospective survey of the French language society of pediatric anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:904-912
  3. Tobias JD. Postoperative analgesia and intraoperative inhalational anesthetic requirements during umblical herniorrhaphy in children: postinsicional local infiltration versus preinsicional caudal block. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:634-638
  4. Schuepfer G, Konrad C, Schmeck J, et al. Generating a learning curve for pediatric caudal epidural block's: an empirical evaluation of technical skills in novice and experienced anesthetists. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25:385-388
  5. Dalens B, Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg 1989; 68:83-89
  6. Markakis DA. Regional anesthesia in pediatrics. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2000; 18:355-381
  7. Eti Z, Batırel H, Göğüs FY. 981 pediyatrik hastada kaudal analjezinin geriye dönük değerlendirilmesi. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 2000; 28:313-316
  8. Veyckemans F, Van Obbergh LJ, Gouverneur JM. Lessons from 1100 pediatric caudal blocks in a teaching hospital. Reg Anesth 1992; 17:119-125
  9. Rowney DA, Doyle E. Epidural and subarachnoid blockade in children. Anaeshesia 1998; 53:980-1001
  10. Wolf AR, Valley RD, Fear DW, Roy WL, Lerman J. Bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in infants and children: The optimal effective concentration. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:102-106
  11. Eck JB, Ross AK. Paediatric regional anaesthesiawhat makes a difference? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2002; 16:159-174
  12. Berde CB. Convulsions associated with pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1992; 75:164-166. 13. de Beer DA, Thomas ML. Caudal additives in childrensolutions or problems? Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:487-498
  13. Knudsen K, Beckman Suurkiila M, Blomberg S, Sjövall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:507-514
  14. Khalil S, Campos C, Farag AM, et al. Caudal block in children. Ropivacaine compared with bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:1279-1284
  15. Luz G, Innerhofer P, Haussler B et al. Comparison of ropivacaine 0.1 % and 0.2 % with bup