Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5

Efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine and fentanyl for the relief of pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in transurethral resection of prostate

TUR-P ameliyatlarında intratekal neostigmin ve fentanilin analjezik ve postoperatif bulantı-kusma üzerine etkisi

Pages
418–423
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, nausea or vomiting associated with neostigmine administration limits clinical use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of intrathecal (i.t) neostigmine and i.t fentanyl added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for the relief of pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P).Material and Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized study was performed in 60 ASA I- II patients undergoing TUR-P.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients assigned to recieve 2 mL i.t 5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1ml of either normal saline,neostigmine 25 µg or fentanyl 25 µg The onset of anesthesia, maximal level of sensory block, sensory regression to S1-2 dermatome, bromage score, use and timing of rescue analgesic and antiemetik, visual analog pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours and the incidence of side effects were recorded..Results: Bromage scores were significantly high and need for rescue antiemetic therapy higher in the neostigmine group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, nausea or vomiting associated with neostigmine administration limits clinical use.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of intrathecal (i.t) neostigmine and i.t fentanyl added to hyperbaric bupivacaine for the relief of pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P).Material and Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized study was performed in 60 ASA I- II patients undergoing TUR-P. Patients assigned to recieve 2 mL i.t 5 % hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1ml of either normal saline,neostigmine 25 µg or fentanyl 25 µg The onset of anesthesia, maximal level of sensory block, sensory regression to S1-2 dermatome, bromage score, use and timing of rescue analgesic and antiemetik, visual analog pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours and the incidence of side effects were recorded..Results: Bromage scores were significantly high and need for rescue antiemetic therapy higher in the neostigmine group. Side effects were similar between the fentanyl and neostigmin groups exception of nausea and vomiting occurred in the neostigmin group more frequently than in the control and fentanyl groups.Conclusion: We conclude that intrathecal neostigmine, or fentanyl combined with hiyperbaric bupivacaine provides effective analgesia for TUR-P. However, nausea or vomiting associated with neostigmine administration limits clinical use.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, TUR-P ameliyatlarında intratekal yoldan kullanılan hiperbarik bupivakaine ilave edilen neostigmin ve fentanilin analjezik etkinliği, emniyeti ve postoperatif bulantı ve kusma üzerine etkilerini karşılaştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu randomize, prospektif ve çift-kör çalışma TUR-P ameliyatı planlanan, ASA I-II risk grubunda 60 hastada yapıldı. Hastalar 2 mL intratekal % 0.5'lik hiperbarik bupivakaine ilave olarak 25 µg neostigmin, 25 µg fentanil veya 1 mL normal salin alacak şekilde ayrıldı. Analjezi başlama zamanı maksimal ulaşılan dermatom seviyesi, sensoriyal bloğun S1-S2'ye inme süresi, Bromage skoru, analjezi ve antiemetik kullanımı ve süreleri, ilk postoperatif 24 saatlik ağrı skorları (VAS) ve yan etkileri kaydedildi.Bulgular: Neostigmin grubunda, Bromage skoru ortalaması yüksek bulundu ve antiemetik tedavi neostigmin grubunda daha fazlaydı. Fentanil ve neostigmin grubunda yan etkiler bulantı ve kusma hariç benzerdi. Bulantı ve kusma neostigmin grubunda kontrol ve fentanil grubuna göre daha sıklıkla görüldü.Sonuç: TUR-P ameliyatlarından sonra intratekal hiperbarik bupivakain ilave edilen fentanil ve neostigmin etkin analjezi sağlar. Buna karşılık bulantı ve kusmanın neostigmin kullanılan hastalarda daha sık görülmesi kullanımını kısıtlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

OBA, S., ÇINAR, S. Ö., TÜRKOĞLU, L., BAŞGÜL, A. (2022). Efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine and fentanyl for the relief of pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in transurethral resection of prostate. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5, 418–423. https://ajindex.com/articles/620148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Togal T, Demirbilek S, Köroğlu A, Yapıcı E, Ersoy O. Effects of S(+) ketamine added to bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for prostate surgery in elderly patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:193-197
  2. Ben-David B, Soloman E, Levin H, Admoni H, Goldik Z. Intrathecal fentanyl with small dose diluted bupivacaine. Better anesthesia without prolonging recovery.Anesth Analg 1997; 85:560-565
  3. Yeğin A, Sanlı S, Döşemeci L, et al. The analgesic and sedative effects of intrathecal midazolam in perianal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:658-662
  4. Liu SS, Hodgson PS, Moore JM, Trautman WJ, Burkhead DL. Dose-response effect of spinal neostigmine added to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in volunteers.Anesthesiology 1999; 90:710-717
  5. Bozkurt P, Süzer O, Ekinci E, et al. Effects of bupivacaine used with sevoflurane on the rhythm and contractility in the isolated rat heart. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 199-204
  6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS. Clinical Anesthesiology, Nonvolatile anesthetics. 2nd edition. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange; 1996: 128-148
  7. Gwirtz KH, Young JV, Byers RS, et al. The safety and efficacy of intrathecal opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain: seven years' experience with 5969 surgical patient at Indiana university hospital. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:599-604
  8. Lauretti GR, Reis MP, Prado WA, Klamt JG. Dose- responds study of intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal neostigmine, their combination, or placebo for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:1182-1187
  9. Lauretti GR, Reis MP. Subarachnoid neostigmine does not affect blood pressure or heart rate during bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:586-591
  10. Eisenach JC, Hood DD, Curry R. Phase I human safety assessment of intrathecal neostigmine containing methyl- and propylparabens. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 842-846
  11. Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1965; 16:55-59
  12. Tan PH, Chia YY, Lo Y, et al. Intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine for postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Can J Anesth 2001; 48:551-556
  13. Owen MD,Özsaraç Ö.,Şahin Ş.,et al low dose clonidine and neostigmine prolong the duration of intrathecal bupivacaine- fentanyl for labour analgesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 361-366
  14. Tan PH, Kuo JH, Liu K, et âl. Efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine for the relief of post in