Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 6

The effect of different anaesthetic technics on stress response to the surgery

Farklı anestezi yöntemlerinin cerrahi stres yanıt üzerindeki etkisi

Pages
471–479
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Plasma cortisol , ACTH, prolactin, insulin, glucose and leptin concentration were determined ,one hour post-incision and 24th hours with RIA or IRMA methods as appropriate.Results: Hemodynamic response to intubation and surgical incision was depressed at alfentanil and remifentanil groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study compared the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine including leptin responses to surgery with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol-alfentanil or propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane anesthesia.Materials ve Methods: Fortyfive ASA I-II, patients scheduled to undergo abdominal surgery were randomly divided into three groups (N=15).
📊
Key Findings & Data:General anaesthesia induction and neuromuscular paralysis were performed in all patients with 1,5 mg kg-1 propofol and 0.1 mg kg-1 vecuronium respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Plasma cortisol , ACTH, prolactin, insulin, glucose and leptin concentration were determined ,one hour post-incision and 24th hours with RIA or IRMA methods as appropriate.Results: Hemodynamic response to intubation and surgical incision was depressed at alfentanil and remifentanil groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study compared the hemodynamic, metabolic and endocrine including leptin responses to surgery with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol-alfentanil or propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane anesthesia.Materials ve Methods: Fortyfive ASA I-II, patients scheduled to undergo abdominal surgery were randomly divided into three groups (N=15). General anaesthesia induction and neuromuscular paralysis were performed in all patients with 1,5 mg kg-1 propofol and 0.1 mg kg-1 vecuronium respectively. In Addition group I patients were given 1 µg kg-1 fentanyl, group II patients were given 40 µg kg-1 alfentanil and group III patients were given 1 µg kg-1 remifentanil. Maintenance anaesthesia was performed in group I with 1.5-3 % sevoflurane and 50 % N2O/O2 in group II with 100 µg kg-1 min-1 propofol and 2 µg kg-1 min-1 alfentanil and after the first hour 1 µg kg-1 min-1 alfentanil infusion. Third group was administered 100 µg kg-1 propofol and 0.25 µg kg-1 min-1 remifentanil infusion. Hemodynamic changes were recorded. Plasma cortisol , ACTH, prolactin, insulin, glucose and leptin concentration were determined ,one hour post-incision and 24th hours with RIA or IRMA methods as appropriate.Results: Hemodynamic response to intubation and surgical incision was depressed at alfentanil and remifentanil groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, propofol-alfentanil ve propofol-remifentanil kullanılan total intravenöz anestezi (TİVA) ile sevofluran anestezisinin cerrahi strese karşı hemodinamik, metabolik ve leptin dahil endokrin yanıtları karşılaştırıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: ASA I-II grubunda, batın operasyonu planlanan 45 hasta rasgele üç gruba ayrıldı. Genel anestezi indüksiyonu tüm gruplarda 1.5 mg kg-1 propofol ve nöromuskuler paralizi 0.1 mg kg-1 veküronyum ile yapıldı ve ek olarak Grup I'e 1 µg kg-1 fentanil, Grup II'e 40 µg kg-1 alfentanil, Grup III'e 1 µg kg-1 remifentanil kullanıldı. Anestezi idamesinde; I. grupta; % 1.5-3 sevofluran + % 50 N2O/O2, II. grupta 100 µg kg-1 dk-1 propofol + 2 µg kg-1 dk-1 alfentanil, 1. saatten sonra 1 µg kg-1 dk-1 alfentanil, III. grupta 100 µg kg-1 dk-1 propofol ve 0.25 µg kg-1 dk-1 remifentanil infüzyonu yapıldı. Hemodinamik değişiklikleri kaydedildi. Plazma kortizol, ACTH, prolaktin, insülin, glukoz ve leptin düzeylerinin ölçümleri, indüksiyon öncesi, indüksiyondan 60. dk. sonra ve postoperatif 24. saatte RİA veya İRMA yöntemleri ile yapıldı.Bulgular: Entübasyon ve cerrahi insizyona hemodinamik yanıt alfentanil ve remifentanil gruplarında baskılandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLLÜ, M., KOL, Ö. İ., KAŞ, D. (2022). The effect of different anaesthetic technics on stress response to the surgery. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 6, 471–479. https://ajindex.com/articles/620124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kayhan Z. Klinik Anestezi, II. Baskı, Logos Yayıncılık, İstanbul 1997; 354-360
  2. Weissman C. The metabolic response tolpress: An overview and update. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:308-327
  3. Derbyshire DR, Smith G. Sympathoadrenal responses to anaesthesia and surgery. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56:725- 739
  4. Miller RD, Cucchiara RF, Miller ED, et al. Anesthesia, 6th ed., Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 2005; 664-665
  5. Schricker T, Carli F, Schreiber M, et al. Propofol/sufentanil anesthesia suppresses the metabolic and endocrine response during, not after, lower abdominal surgery.Anesth Analg 2000; 90:450-455
  6. Ivani G, Vaira M, Fossa S, et al. Protective efficacy of 3 anesthetic methods with reference to surgical stress in children. Can Anesthesiol 1996; 44:297-302
  7. Camu F, Royston D. Inpatient experience with remifentanil. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:15-21
  8. Brockmann C, Raasch W, Bastian C. Endocrine stress parameters during TIVA with remifentanil or sulfentanil. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2000; 35:685-691
  9. Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Verkkala K, et al. A compa- rison of remifentanil and alfentanil for use with propofol in patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90:1269-1274
  10. O'Hare R, McAtamney D, Mirakhur RK, etal. Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:283-285
  11. Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, et al. Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesthl998; 80:467-469
  12. Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, et al. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:279-285
  13. Robinson DN, O'Brien K, Kumar R, et al. Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade in children: a comparison of propofol combined either with alfentanil or remifentanil. Paediatr Anaesth 1998; 8:467-471
  14. Schiittler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A compari- son of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52:307-317
  15. Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 84|515-521
  16. Kurşun S, Çelebi H, Bozkih F, Elbekls. Midazolam+alfentanil ile TTVA ve halotan ile inhalasyon anestezisinin stres