Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the effects of fentanyl and sufentanyl on haemodynamy and recovery parameters during TIVA craniotomy

Kraniyotomilerde total intravenöz anestezi uygulamasında kullanılan sufentanil ve fentanilin hemodinami ve derlenmeye etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
246–252
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Time needed for eye opening (p=0.009) and hand gripping (p=0.019) were significantly shorter in sufentanyl group.Conclusion: We conclude that in patients undergoing craniotomy, sufentanyl administrated at doses used for TIVA is more effective in depressing the intraoperative haemodynamic response than fentanyl and provides more rapid recovery time than fentanyl.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to compare the effects of fentanyl and sufentanyl on haemodynamy and recovery parameters during TIVA in patients undergoing craniotomy.Materials and Methods: Thirty ASA I-II patients aged between 18 to 60 years who underwent elective craniotomy were randomly divided into two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Anesthesia induction was provided by intravenous atropine 0.1 mg kg-1, propofol 2-3 mg kg-1, vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 in both groups. 2 µg kg-1 fentanyl was administered intravenously to the patients in fentanyl group, 1 µg kg-1 iv sufentanyl was given in sufentanyl group during anesthesia induction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Time needed for eye opening (p=0.009) and hand gripping (p=0.019) were significantly shorter in sufentanyl group.Conclusion: We conclude that in patients undergoing craniotomy, sufentanyl administrated at doses used for TIVA is more effective in depressing the intraoperative haemodynamic response than fentanyl and provides more rapid recovery time than fentanyl.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare the effects of fentanyl and sufentanyl on haemodynamy and recovery parameters during TIVA in patients undergoing craniotomy.Materials and Methods: Thirty ASA I-II patients aged between 18 to 60 years who underwent elective craniotomy were randomly divided into two groups. Anesthesia induction was provided by intravenous atropine 0.1 mg kg-1, propofol 2-3 mg kg-1, vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 in both groups. 2 µg kg-1 fentanyl was administered intravenously to the patients in fentanyl group, 1 µg kg-1 iv sufentanyl was given in sufentanyl group during anesthesia induction. Anaesthesia was maintained with % 50 O2 + air and 5-7 mg kg-1 propofol infusion in both groups with additional sufentanyl infusion at the rate of 0.3 µg kg-1 h-1 in the sufentanyl group and 1 µg kg-1 h-1 fentanyl in the fentanyl group.Haemodynamic variables were recorded during anesthesia till 240 min after extubation, including just before induction, before and after intubation, before and after pin holder insertion, before surgical incision and after surgical incision.Results: In fentanyl group when compared with sufentanyl group, mean arterial blood pressures were significantly higher following intubation (p=0.001), pin holder insertion (p=0.001) and surgical incision (p=0.020). In addition in fentanyl group mean arterial blood pressures increased significantly, both after intubation (p=0.001) and extubation (p=0.023) when compared with previous values. In fentanyl group, heart rates increased significantly, both after intubation (p=0.013) and extubation (p=0.017) while in sufentanyl group heart rates increased significantly only after extubation (p=0.038) when compared with previous values. Time needed for eye opening (p=0.009) and hand gripping (p=0.019) were significantly shorter in sufentanyl group.Conclusion: We conclude that in patients undergoing craniotomy, sufentanyl administrated at doses used for TIVA is more effective in depressing the intraoperative haemodynamic response than fentanyl and provides more rapid recovery time than fentanyl.

Özet

Amaç: Kraniyotomi olgularında TİVA uygulamasında, fentanil ve sufentanil kullanımının hemodinami ve derlenme parametreleri üzerine olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılmasını amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Elektif kraniyotomi uygulanacak ASA I - II grubundan 18 -60 yaş arası 30 hasta rasgele olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Anestezi indüksiyonu, her iki grupta da, intravenöz 0.1 mg kg-1 atropin sulfat, 2-3 mg kg-1 propofol ve 0.1 mg kg-1 vekuronyum ile sağlandı. Fentanil grubundaki olgulara indüksiyonda intravenöz olarak 2 µg kg-1 fentanil, sufentanil grubundaki olgulara ise indüksiyonda 1 µg kg-1 sufentanil iv verildi. Anestezi idamesinde her iki grupta % 50 O2 + hava karışımının yanı sıra 5-7 mg kg-1 sa-1 propofol infüzyonu ve sufentanil grubunda 0.3 µg kg-1 sa-1 sufentanil infüzyonu, fentanil grubunda 1 µg kg-1 sa-1 fentanil infüzyonu kullanıldı.Hemodinamik parametreler anestezi indüksiyonu öncesi, entübasyon öncesi ve sonrası, indüksiyon sonrası, çivili başlık yerleştirilmeden önce ve sonra, cerrahi insizyon öncesi ve sonrasında, tüm anestezi süresince postoperatif 240. dk.'ya dek kaydedildi.Bulgular: Fentanil grubunda sufentanil grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında, entübasyon sonrası (p=0.001), çivili başlık yerleştirilmesi (p=0.001) ve cerrahi insizyon sonrasındaki (p=0.020) ortalama arter basıncı (OAB) değerlerinin anlamlı olarak artmış olduğu saptandı. Ayrıca OAB, fentanil grubunda entübasyon sonrasında (p=0.011) ve ekstübasyon sonrasında (p=0.023) bir önceki değere göre artış gösterdi. Kalp atım hızı fentanil grubunda hem entübasyon sonrası (p=0.013) hem ekstübasyon sonrası (p=0.017); sufentanil grubunda ise ekstübasyon sonrasında (p=0.038) bir önceki değere göre anlamlı olarak artış gösterdi. Göz açma (p=0.009) ve el sıkma zamanları (p=0.019) sufentanil grubunda daha kısa bulundu.Sonuç: Kraniyotomi olgularında TİVA uygulamasında kullanılan dozlarda sufentanil'in intraoperatif hemodinamik yanıtları daha etkin olarak baskıladığı ve fentanil'e göre daha kısa sürede derlenme sağladığı kanısına vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYAR, M., DEMİRAĞ, K., ERİŞ, O., BALCIOĞLU, T., YEKE, P., DERBENT, A. (2022). Comparison of the effects of fentanyl and sufentanyl on haemodynamy and recovery parameters during TIVA craniotomy. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 246–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/620113

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bristow A, Shalev D, Rice B, Liptoii JM, Giesecke AH. Low-dose synthetic narcotic infusions for cerebral relaxation during craniotomies. Anesth Analg. 1987
  2. Tobias JD. Increased intracranial pressure after fentanyl administration in a child with closed head trauma. Ped EmergCare 1994
  3. Albanese J, Durbec O, Vivian X, et al. Sufentanyl increases intracranial pressure in patients with head trauma. Anesthesiology 1993
  4. Carney A, Chestnut R, Kochaneck P. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic injury in infants, children and adolescents. Grit Care Med 2003
  5. (suppl):417-491. 5. Aldrete JA. The postanesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995
  6. Pashayan AG, Grundy BL, Mahla ME, Shah BD. Comparison of sufentanyl, fentanyl, and isoflurane for neuroanesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991
  7. Trindle MR, Dodson BA, Rampil IJ. Effects of fentanyl versus sufentanyl in equianesthetic doses on middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity. Anesthesiology 1993
  8. Gupta AK, Summors A. Awake craniotomy. In: Notes in Neuroanesthesia & Critical Care. Greenwich Medical Media Ltd. 2001
  9. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanyl and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesthesiology 1997
  10. Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P, Sarma SK, et al. A comparison of remifentanyl and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg 2000
  11. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Anesthesia for neurosurgery. In: Clinical Anesthesiology, 3rd edition. Appleton & Lange 2002
  12. Kay B, Nolan D, Mayall R, Healy TEJ. The effect of sufentanyl on the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1987
  13. Jamali S, Archer D, Ravussin P, et al. The effect of skull-pin insertion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence of sufentanyl and fentanyl. Anesth Analg 1997
  14. Hartley M,Vaughan RS. Problems associated with tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth 1993
  15. Dyson A, Isaac P, Pennant JH, Giesecke AH, et al. EsmoloJ attenuates cardiovascular responses to extubation. Anesth Analg 1990
  16. Fujii YS, Takaheshi S, Toyooka H. Combined diltiazem and lidocaine reduces cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation and anesthesia emergence in hypertensive patients. C