Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 5

The effect of body-mass index on the duration of spinal anesthesia

Farklı beden kitle indekslerinin spinal anestezi süresine etkisi

Pages
300–304
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although motor block relief time was similar between group EW and O, there was a significant difference between these groups regarding to two level declining time (p< 0.05). 2nd and 4th minute Bromage scores were higher in Group O than Group N and Group EW (p< 0.05)Conclusion: We considered that the duration of the spinal anaesthesia obtained with same volume of local anaesthetics were lengthened parallel to BMI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of our study was to examine the duration of spinal anaesthesia obtained with same volume of local anesthetics in patients who have different body-mass index (BMI).Materials and Methods: After the approval from the faculty ethical committee and patient informed consent, 90 patient (ASA I-II, 15-65 years-old) who have undergoing elective urological surgery were included in to the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients had normal body weight (BMI= 20-25), excessive body weight (BMI= 25-30) and obese patients (BMI= 30-35) were divided in N, EW (Excessive weight) and O groups, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although motor block relief time was similar between group EW and O, there was a significant difference between these groups regarding to two level declining time (p< 0.05). 2nd and 4th minute Bromage scores were higher in Group O than Group N and Group EW (p< 0.05)Conclusion: We considered that the duration of the spinal anaesthesia obtained with same volume of local anaesthetics were lengthened parallel to BMI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of our study was to examine the duration of spinal anaesthesia obtained with same volume of local anesthetics in patients who have different body-mass index (BMI).Materials and Methods: After the approval from the faculty ethical committee and patient informed consent, 90 patient (ASA I-II, 15-65 years-old) who have undergoing elective urological surgery were included in to the study. Patients had normal body weight (BMI= 20-25), excessive body weight (BMI= 25-30) and obese patients (BMI= 30-35) were divided in N, EW (Excessive weight) and O groups, respectively. Spinal block was achieved by 3 mL hyperbaric bupivacaine with a 25 G Quincke spinal needle through L4-L5. Following the spinal block, maximum sensory block level, the periods to reaching the maximum sensory block, to decline of the sensory block at two levels, the time of the motor block relief were recorded in each patient in two minutes intervals.Results: The time to two level decline of sensory block and the time of the motor block relief were longer significantly in Group EW and O than Group N (p< 0.05). Although motor block relief time was similar between group EW and O, there was a significant difference between these groups regarding to two level declining time (p< 0.05). 2nd and 4th minute Bromage scores were higher in Group O than Group N and Group EW (p< 0.05)Conclusion: We considered that the duration of the spinal anaesthesia obtained with same volume of local anaesthetics were lengthened parallel to BMI.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda farklı beden kitle indekslerine (BKİ) sahip olgularda aynı volüm lokal anestezikle uygulanan spinal anestezinin etki süresini araştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Fakülte etik kurul ve hastaların onayı alındıktan sonra elektif ürolojik cerrahi planlanan ASA I-II grubu, 15-65 yaş arası toplam 90 olgu çalışmaya alındı. BKİ: 20-25 (normal kilolu) olan olgular Grup N, BKİ: 25-30 (aşırı kilolu) olan olgular Grup AK ve BKİ: 30-35 (obez) olan olgular Grup O olarak adlandırıldı. L4-L5 aralığından 25 G Quincke spinal iğne ile 3 mL % 0.5 hiperbarik bupivakain kullanılarak spinal blok gerçekleştirildi ve her iki dakikada bir maksimum duyusal blok seviyesi, maksimum duyusal blok seviyesine ulaşıncaya kadar geçen süre, duyusal bloğun 2 seviye gerileme zamanı ve motor blok kalkış zamanı kaydedildi.Bulgular: Duyusal bloğun 2 seviye gerileme zamanı ve motor bloğun kalkış zamanı, Grup AK ve Grup O'da Grup N'den anlamlı olarak uzundu (p< 0.05). Yine Grup AK ile Grup O arasında duyusal bloğun 2 seviye gerileme zamanı açısından fark vardı (p< 0.05). Ancak, motor bloğun kalkış süresi her iki grupta benzerdi. Grup O' da 2. ve 4. dk. bromage skorları Grup N ve AK'den yüksekti (p< 0.05).Sonuç: Farklı BKİ'lerine sahip olgularda aynı volümde lokal anestezik ile sağlanan spinal anestezi etki süresinin beden kitle indeksine bağlı olarak uzadığı kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLBAŞ, N., ERDEM, T. B., YÜCEL, A., BEGEÇ, Z., ERSOY, M., DURMUŞ, M. (2022). The effect of body-mass index on the duration of spinal anesthesia. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 5, 300–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/620098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Carpenter RL, Hogan QH, Liu SS, et al. Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:24-29
  2. Grene NM. Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space. Anesth Analg 1985; 64:715-730
  3. Nielsen KC, Güller U, Steele SM, et al. Influence of obesity on surgical regional anesthesia in the ambulatory setting: an analysis of 9,038 blocks. Anesthesiology 2005; 102:181-187
  4. McCulloch WJD, Littlewood DG. Influence of obesity on spinal analgesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58:610-614
  5. Hodgkinson R, Husain FJ. Obesity, gravity, and spread of epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1981; 60:421-424
  6. Hodgkinson R, Husain FJ. Obesity and Cephalad spread of analgesia following epidural administration of bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1980; 59:89-92 7. Adams JP, Murphy PG. Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:91-108
  7. Infante NEK, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Extent of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia influences the duration of spinal block. Anestesiology 2000; 92:1319-1323
  8. Hogan QH, Prost RBS; Kulier A. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:1341-1349
  9. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Clinical Anesthesia. 4th edition. USA: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2001, 699
  10. Taivainen T, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Influence of obesity on the spread of spinal analgesia after injection of plain 0.5' % bupivacaine at the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64:542-546
  11. Kayhan Z. Klinik Anestezi
  12. Baskı. İstanbul: Logos yayıncılık, 2004: 506
  13. Higuchi H, Hirata JI, Adachi Y, et al. Influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid density, velocity, and volume on extent and duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:106-114
  14. Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Kazama T. The influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume on extent and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: a comparison between seated and lateral decubitus injection positions. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101:555-560.