Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5

The effects of different infusion rates of propofol during induction of anaesthesia

Propofolün farklı infüzyon hızlarının anestezi indüksiyonu sırasındaki etkileri

Pages
337–343
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To avoid cardiovascular depression of propofol, slow infusion is recommended during induction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Propofol is a hypnotic sedative drug which is used for anaesthesia induction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is determination of best propofol dose with different infusion rates of propofol administered by syringe pumps.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To avoid cardiovascular depression of propofol, slow infusion is recommended during induction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Propofol is a hypnotic sedative drug which is used for anaesthesia induction. To avoid cardiovascular depression of propofol, slow infusion is recommended during induction. The aim of this study is determination of best propofol dose with different infusion rates of propofol administered by syringe pumps. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed on 100 patients of ASA I or II aged 18-65 years. All patients were premedicated with midazolam. Standard monitoring was followed by fentanyl 1.5 mcg kg-1 iv before the patients were randomly allocated to one of five groups each including 20 patients. Groups I, II, III, IV and V were infused propofol in rates of 200, 400, 600, 800 or 1000 mL h-1, consecutively until loss of eyelash reflex. The duration of induction was recorded with the amount of propofol infused. The induction dose in mg kg-1 body weight was calculated. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before and five consecutive minutes following induction.Results: The doses required to abolish eyelash reflex was 0.81±0.26, 1.41±0.7, 1.68±0.67, 2.35±0.82 and 2.27±0.62 mg kg-1 body weight for Groups I to V consecutively and found significantly different between groups (p

Özet

Giriş: Propofol anestezi indüksiyon ve idamesinde kullanılan sedatif hipnotik bir ajandır. Kardiyovasküler depresyon yapabildiğinden, indüksiyon sırasında yavaş infüzyonu önerilmektedir. Çalışmamızda, propofolü infüzyon pompasıyla farklı hızlarda vererek indüksiyon için uygun propofol infüzyon hızını saptamayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif randomize çalışma ASA I-II sınıfı 18-65 yaş arası 100 hastada yapıldı. Tüm hastalara midazolam ile premedikasyon uygulandı. Standart monitörizasyon sonrası 1.5 mcg kg-1 dozunda iv fentanil verildi. Hastalar rasgele seçim ile yirmişer kişilik 5 gruba ayrılıp, 200-400-600-800-1000 mL sa-1 propofol infüzyonu kirpik refleksi kaybolana kadar uygulandı. Verilen propofol miktarıyla indüksiyon süresi kaydedildi. Arter kan basıncı ve kalp hızı indüksiyondan önce ve sonra beş kez her dakika kaydedildi.Bulgular: Kirpik refleksinin kaybolması için gereken doz Grup I’den V’e sırasıyla 0.81±0.26, 1.41±0.7, 1.68±0.67, 2.35±0.82 ve 2.27±0.62 mg kg-1 vücut ağırlığı olup, gruplar arasında anlamlı olarak farklıydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Ö., TÜRECİ, E., BAHAR, M., TUNALI, Y., YENTÜR, E. (2022). The effects of different infusion rates of propofol during induction of anaesthesia. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5, 337–343. https://ajindex.com/articles/620029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cummings G.C, Dixon J, Kay NH, et al. Dose requirements for ICI 35, 868 (propofol, Diprivan) in a new formulation for induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1984; 39:1168-1171
  2. Dundee JW, Robinson FP, McCollum JS, Patterson CC. Sensitivity to propofol in the elderly. Anaesthesia 1986; 41:482-485
  3. Leslie K, Crankshaw DP. Lean tissue mass is a useful predictor of induction dose requirements for propofol. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19:57-60
  4. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anaesthesiology 1999; 90:1502-1516
  5. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, et al. Comparison of the effect-site k(e0)s of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients. Anaesthesiology 1999; 90:1517-1527
  6. Kreuer S, Schreiber JU, Bruhn J, Wilhelm W. Impact of patient age on propofol consumption during propofol–remifentanil anaesthesia Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22(2):123-128
  7. Hirota K, Ebina T, Sato T, Ishihara H, Matsuki A. Is total body weight an appropriate predictor for propofol maintenance dose? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43:842-844
  8. Ortolani O, Conti A, Ngumi ZW, et al. Ethnic differences in propofol and fentanyl response: a comparison among Caucasians, Kenyan, Africans and Brasilians. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21(4):314-319
  9. Chassard D, Berrada K, Bryssine B, Guiraud M, Bouletreau P. Influence of body compartments on propofol induction dose in female patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 90:889-891
  10. Stokes DN, Hutton P. Rate-dependent induction phenomena with propofol: implications for the relative potency of intravenous anesthetics. Anesth Analg 1991; 72:578-583
  11. Short TG, Chui PT. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67:539–545
  12. Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anaesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:1346-1351
  13. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, et al. Investigation of effective anaesthesia induction doses using a wide range of infusion rates with undiluted and diluted propofol. Anaesthesiology 2000; 92:1017-1028
  14. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, IkedaT, Kikura M, Sato S. Relation between initial blood distribution volume and propofol induction dose requirement. Anaesthesiology 2001; 94:205-210
  15. Gepts E. Pharmacokinetic concepts for TCI anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998; 53(Suppl 1):4-12
  16. Adachi YU, Uchihashi Y, Watanabe K, Satoh T. Small dose midazolam or droperidol reduces t