Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine and isobaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery

Ortopedik cerrahi anestezisinde intratekal levobupivakain ile izobarik bupivakain etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
346–350
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Onset times to sensory block was significantly faster in Group B (2.15±0.89) min than Group L (5.81±3.21) min (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Bupivacaine is the most used long-acting local anesthetic intrathecally for orthopedic surgery.But it is known that has serious complications about cardiologic and nervous system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We studied for 84 patients with ASA II-III, ages 55-75 except having contraindications against spinal anesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Onset times to sensory block was significantly faster in Group B (2.15±0.89) min than Group L (5.81±3.21) min (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Bupivacaine is the most used long-acting local anesthetic intrathecally for orthopedic surgery.But it is known that has serious complications about cardiologic and nervous system. Levobupivacaine, the pure S(-) enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine is long-acting local anesthetic that has been less toxic to the cardiovascular and central nervous system. Aim of this study; levobupivacaine was safer, alternative to bupivacaine however having similar hemodynamic and anesthetic profile while doing spinal anaesthesia to patients undergoing orthopedic surgery was discussed. Material and Methods: We studied for 84 patients with ASA II-III, ages 55-75 except having contraindications against spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated two groups receiving either 12, 5 mg 0.5 % isobaric bupivacaine (Group B, n=42) or 12,5 mg 0.5 % isobaric levobupivacaine (Group L, n=42) . No premedication but IV infusion of 7 mL kg-1 lactated Ringer solution started before neuraxial block. Both drugs were administered intrathecally. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation variables were recorded preoperatively and intraoperative every 5 min for up to 15 min then every 15 min with the end of 90 min. Sensory, motor blockade and time to regression of two dermatomes, complications were recorded.Results: There were no significant differences between groups for hemodynamic variables. Onset times to sensory block was significantly faster in Group B (2.15±0.89) min than Group L (5.81±3.21) min (p

Özet

Amaç: Ortopedik cerrahi anestezisinde, intratekal yol ile en çok kullanılan lokal anestezik, uzun etkili olma özelliğiyle bupivakaindir. Ancak bupivakainin, kardiyovasküler ve sinir sistemi ile ilgili ciddi komplikasyonları olduğu da bilinmektedir. Levobupivakain, bupivakainin saf S (-) enantiomeri olarak geliştirilmiş, kardiyovasküler sisteme ve santral sinir sistemine daha az toksik, uzun etkili lokal anesteziktir. Çalışmada, ortopedik cerrahi anestezisinde spinal anestezi yöntemi uygulamasında, levobupivakainin bupivakaine alternatif, daha güvenli, benzer hemodinamik ve anestezik profile sahip yeni bir lokal anestezik ilaç olup olamayacağının araştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya, ASA II-III, 55-75 yaşları arasında, nöroaksiyel blok kontrendikasyonu bulunmayan, farklı ortopedik cerrahi uygulanacak 84 hasta alındı. Olgular randomize iki gruba ayrıldı. Premedikasyon uygulanmayan olgulara, işlem öncesi 7mL kg-1 Ringer Laktat ile sıvı replasmanı yapıldı. Grup B: bupivakain; (n=42) 12, 5 mg % 0.5 izobarik bupivakain, Grup L: levobupivakain; (n=42) 12, 5 mg % 0, 5 izobarik levobupivakain intratekal olarak uygulandı. Preoperatif, intraoperatif 5., 10., 15., 30., 45., 60., 90., dakikalarda sistolik arter basıncı, diyastolik arter basıncı, kalp atım hızı, oksijen saturasyonu izlendi. Duyusal blok, motor blok, iki dermatom gerileme süreleri ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi.Bulgular: Hemodinamik parametrelerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Grup L’de duyusal blok başlama süresi: 5.81±3.21 dk, Grup B’de 2.15±0.89 dk olup, aralarındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYUVACI, E., EREN, N., ÜSTÜNER, A., KARABAĞ, G., TOPUZ, C., BAŞARAN, H. (2022). Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine and isobaric bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 6, 346–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/619970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Casati A, Putzu M. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19(2):247-68
  2. Foster M, Rachel H. Levobupivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs 2000;59(3):551-79
  3. Casati A, Vinciguerna F. Intratecal anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2002;15(5):543-51
  4. Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anest Analg 2002;94:194-8
  5. Fattorini F, Ricci Z, Rocco A et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacine for spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic major surgery. Minerva Anaestesiol 2006;72:637-44
  6. Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003;31:637-41
  7. Burke D, Kennedy S, Bannister J et al. Spinal anesthesia with 0,5 % S(-) bupivacaine for elective lower limb surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;24:519-23
  8. Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L et al. Comparison of the effects of intratecal ropivacaine levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:684-9
  9. Sauberer MA, Sibylle A, Langenecker K et al. Median effective local anesthetic doses of plain bupivacaine and ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia administered via a spinal catheter for brachytherapy of the lower abdomen.Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:4-9
  10. Sell A, Olkkola KT, Jalonen J et al. Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:239-42
  11. Göktuğ A, Takmaz S, Uyar E ve ark. İnguinal herni operasyonlarında % 0,5 bupivakain ile % 0,5 levobupivakainin anestezi kalitesi ve hemodinamik parametreler yönünden karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2006;34:254-5
  12. Arslantaş R, Arslantaş MK, Şitilci T ve ark. Ürolojik girişimlerde bupivakain ile levobupivakainin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2006;34:257-6
  13. Camorcia M, Capogna G, Berritra C et al. The relative potencies for motor block after intratecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 2007;104:904-7
  14. Lacassie H, Habib A, Malachy O et al. Motor blocking minimum local anesthetic concentrations of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor. Reg Anaesth Pain Med 2007;32:323-9
  15. Breebaart MB, Vercauteren MP, Hoffmann VL et al. Urinary bladder scanning afterday-case art