Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375 % ropivacaine and 0.375 % ropivacaine plus (+) S-ketamine in intravenous regional anesthesia for forearm surgery

Önkol cerrahisinde %0.375 ropivakain ve % 0.375 ropivakain + (+)S-ketamin ile oluşturulan rejyonel intravenöz anestezinin klinik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
90–97
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Tourniquet pain and tolerance were significantly better in group RK (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Regional Intravenous Anesthesia (RIVA) is a frequently applied method in patients who will undergo upper extremity surgical operations, for its ease of use, rapid effectiveness and short hospitalization period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Different drug combinations have been used to overcome some systemic adverse effects and to increase the post-operative analgesic effectiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tourniquet pain and tolerance were significantly better in group RK (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Regional Intravenous Anesthesia (RIVA) is a frequently applied method in patients who will undergo upper extremity surgical operations, for its ease of use, rapid effectiveness and short hospitalization period. Different drug combinations have been used to overcome some systemic adverse effects and to increase the post-operative analgesic effectiveness. In our study, we aimed to compare the properties of Ropivacaine (group R) and (+)S-Ketamine plus Ropivacaine (group RK) in IVRA method. 40 objects selected from ASA I-II 40 patients have been randomized into two groups. Patients in GroupR received 0.5 mL kg-1 of 0.375 % ropivacaine and group RK 0.5 mL kg-1 of 0.375 % ropivacaine and 0.8 mg kg-1 of (+)S-ketamine. Heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and SpO2 were measured 2.5 minutes after local anesthesic injection, at the beginning and 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 45 minutes after the operation and 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes after the tourniquet has been released. Tourniquet-operation, sensory-motor block periods, intraoperative anesthesia-analgesia quality, tourniquet tolerance, tourniquet pain (VAS), additional analgesic requierement, patient-surgeon-anesthesist satisfaction, post-operative anesthesia quality, post-operative anesthesia duration side effects-drug reactions were recorded. There was no difference between two groups by means of tourniquet and operation period. Also, there was no intraoperative difference by means of hemodynamic data, sensory-motor blok times, anesthesia and analgesia quality, patient-surgeon-anesthesist satisfaction and additional analgesic requirements. Tourniquet pain and tolerance were significantly better in group RK (p

Özet

Rejyonel İntravenöz Anestezi (RİVA), üst ekstremite cerrahisi yapılacak hastalarda, kolay uygulanması, hızlı etki başlangıcı, hastanede kalma süresinin kısa olması nedeniyle sık olarak tercih edilen bir yöntemdir. RİVA’da farklı ilaç kombinasyonları kullanılarak sistemik yan etkilerin azaltılması ve postoperatif analjezik etkinliğin artırılmasına çalışılmıştır. Çalışmamızda Ropivakain ve (+)S-Ketamin+ Ropivakain ile oluşturulan RİVA’nın özelliklerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.Çalışma, ASA I-II grubunda 40 olgu rasgele iki gruba ayrılarak, Grup R’de % 0.375 Ropivakain 0.5 mL kg-1, Grup RK’da % 0.375 Ropivakain 0.5 mL kg-1 + (+)S-Ketamin 0.8 mg kg-1 verilerek RİVA yapıldı. Lokal anestezik enjeksiyonundan 2,5 dk. sonra, cerrahi başlangıcında, cerrahi başladıktan 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 dk. sonra, turnike indirildikten 1, 5, 10, 15 dk. sonra KAH (kalp atım hızı), SAB (Sistolik kan basıncı), DAB (Distolik kan basıncı), OAB (Ortalama kan basıncı), SpO2 (oksijen saturasyonu) değerleri kaydedildi. Turnike-ameliyat süreleri, duyu-motor blok süreleri, intraoperatif anestezi-analjezi kalitesi, turnike toleransı, turnike ağrısı (VAS), ek analjezik gereksinimi, intraoperatif ilaç reaksiyonu-yan etki, hasta-cerrah-anestezist memnuniyeti, post-operatif analjezi kalitesi, post-operatif analjezi süresi, postoperatif yan etki-ilaç reaksiyonu not edildi. Turnike ve ameliyat sürelerinde iki grup arasında fark bulunmadı. Hemodinamik veriler, duyu-motor blok süreleri, anestezi ve analjezi kalitesi, hasta-cerrah-anestezist memnuniyetleri, ek analjezik gereksinimi; intraoperatif fark göstermedi. Turnike toleransı ve turnike ağrısında ise Grup RK anlamlı iyi bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, S., ALTINIŞIK, U., ERDOĞAN, N., KIRDEMİR, P. (2022). Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375 % ropivacaine and 0.375 % ropivacaine plus (+) S-ketamine in intravenous regional anesthesia for forearm surgery. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 90–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/619969

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Colbern EC. The Bier Block for Intravenous regional anesthesia: Technique and literature review. Anesth Analg 1970; 49:935-940
  2. Goodwin A, Rubenstein N, Otremski I. Intravenous anaesthesia in the upper limb: a review of 225 cases. Int Orthop. 1984;8:51-4
  3. Henderson CL, Warriner B, McEwen JA, Merrick PM. A North American Survey of IVRA. Anesth Analg 1997; 85:858-63
  4. Heath ML. Deaths after intravenous regional anaesthesia. Br Med J 1982; 285(6346):913-914
  5. Almenrader N, Passariello M, D'Amico G, Haiberger R, Pietropaoli P. Caudal additives for postoperative pain management in children: S(+)-ketamine and neostigmine. Paediatr Anaesth 2005; 15:143-147
  6. Hartmannsgruber MW, Silverman DG, Halaszynski TM, Bobart V, Brull SJ, Wilkerson C, Loepke AW, Atanassoff PG. Comparison of ropivacaine 0.2 % and lidocaine 0.5 % for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:727-731
  7. Peng PW, Coleman MM, McCartney CJ, Krone S, Chan VW, Kaszas Z, Vucemilo I. Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375 % ropivacaine versus 0.5 % lidocaine in forearm intravenous regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27:595-599
  8. Acalovschi I, Cristea T, Margarit S, Gavrus R. Tramadol added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:209-214
  9. Armstrong PJ, Morton CP, Nimmo AF. Pethidine has a local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerves in vivo. Addition to prilocaine 0.25 % for intravenous regional anaesthesia in volunteers. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:382-386
  10. Hoffmann V, Vercauteren M, Van Steenberge A, Adriaensen H. Intravenous regional anesthesia. Evaluation of 4 different additives to prilocaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1997; 48:71-76
  11. Picard PR, Tramer MR, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Analgesic efficacy of peripheral opioids (all except intra-articular): a qualitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Pain 1997; 72:309-318
  12. Power I, Hons BSC, Anaes FC, Wildsmith JAW. The effect of fentanyl, meperidine and diamorphine on nerve conduction in vitro. Reg Anesth 1991; 16:204-208
  13. Reuben SS, Steinberg RB, Lurie SD, Gibson CS. A dose-response study of intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:831-835
  14. Juliano PJ, Mazur JM, Cummings RJ, McCluskey WP. Low-dose lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia for forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1992; 12:633-635
  15. Brown EM, McGriff JT, Malinowski RW. Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia (Bier block): revie