Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Effects of the intrathecally administered ketorolac trometamin on spinal cell injury in trauma model of medulla spinalis in rats

Ratlarda oluşturulan medulla spinalis travma modelinde intratekal yolla verilen ketorolak trometamin'in spinal hücre hasarına etkisi

Pages
153–161
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The percentage of the damaged spinal cord area was determined in cross sections.Results: When groups were compared according to the BRS scores; the mean values of the BRS scores was significantly high in group K400 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of intrathecally administered ketorolac trometamin on spinal cell damage, in spinal cord traumatized rats.Materials and Methods: The spinal cord was traumatized, after spinal catheter was placed and fixed to the each rat under anesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subjects were randomized into three groups: Group S (n:6); saline solution (10 µL) was administered through catheter Group K50 (n:6); Fifty microgram ketorolac trometamin solution was diluted in 10 µL of saline and was administered through catheter; Group K400 (n:6); Four hundred microgram ketorolac trometamin was diluted in 10 µL of saline and was administered through catheter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The percentage of the damaged spinal cord area was determined in cross sections.Results: When groups were compared according to the BRS scores; the mean values of the BRS scores was significantly high in group K400 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of intrathecally administered ketorolac trometamin on spinal cell damage, in spinal cord traumatized rats.Materials and Methods: The spinal cord was traumatized, after spinal catheter was placed and fixed to the each rat under anesthesia. The subjects were randomized into three groups: Group S (n:6); saline solution (10 µL) was administered through catheter Group K50 (n:6); Fifty microgram ketorolac trometamin solution was diluted in 10 µL of saline and was administered through catheter; Group K400 (n:6); Four hundred microgram ketorolac trometamin was diluted in 10 µL of saline and was administered through catheter. The scores according to the “Behavior Rating Scale (BRS)” were determined at the 4th, 12th, 24th, 48th and 72nd hours after intrathecally administration of ketorolac tromethamin. The cross sections of spinal cord were examined pathologically. The percentage of the damaged spinal cord area was determined in cross sections.Results: When groups were compared according to the BRS scores; the mean values of the BRS scores was significantly high in group K400 (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda spinal kord travması oluşturulan ratlarda, intratekal verilen ketorolak trometamin’in spinal hücre hasarına etkisinin araştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 18 adet rat alındı. Anestezi altında deneklere spinal kateter takıldı ve tespit edildi. Sonrasında spinal kord travması oluşturuldu. Denekler randomize olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı. Grup S (n:6); deneklere spinal kateterden 10 µL serum fizyolojik verildi. Grup K50 (n:6); Deneklere spinal kateterden 10 µL SF içinde sulandırılmış 50 µg KT, Grup K400 (n:6); deneklere spinal kateterden 10 µL SF içinde sulandırılmış 400 µg KT verildi. Tüm gruplara ilaç verildikten sonra spinal kateter 5 µL SF ile yıkandı. İntratekal ketorolak trometamin uygulaması sonrası 4.,12., 24., 48. ve 72. saat davranış testleri ve fonksiyon kayıplarının değerlendirilmesi “Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB)” davranış derecelendirme skalası kullanılarak yapıldı. Deneklerin spinal kordundan alınan kesitler histopatolojik skorlama ve lezyon alanı ölçümü yapılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: BBB davranış derecelendirme skorlamaları karşılaştırıldığında; 48. ve 72. saatlerde Grup K400’de davranış derecelendirme skorlarının ortalama değerleri anlamlı şekilde yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMEN, N., BAĞRIYANIK, A., ALAYGUT, E., YILMAZ, O., KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, S., GÜNERLİ, A. (2022). Effects of the intrathecally administered ketorolac trometamin on spinal cell injury in trauma model of medulla spinalis in rats. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 153–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/619968

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Hughes JT. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: An analysis of the first case reports of spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 1988; 26:71-82 2. Adams M, Cavanagh JF. International Campaign for Cures of Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis (ICCP): another step forward for spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord 2004; 42:273-80. 3. Sie I, Waters RL. Outcomes following spinal cord injury. In: Lin VW, ed. Spinal Cord Medicine. New York: Demos 2003: 87-103. 4. Hagg T, Oudega M. Degenerative and spontaneous regenerative processes after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23:264-80. 5. Noble LJ, Wrathall JR. Spinal cord contusion in the rat: morphometric analyses of alterations in the spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1985; 88:135-49. 6. Gruner JA. A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 1992; 9:123-6. 7. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp Neurol 1996; 139:244-56. 8. Noyes DH. Electromechanical impactor for producing experimental spinal cord injury in animals. Med Biol Eng Comput 1987; 25:335-40. 9. Stokes BT. Experimental spinal cord injury: a dynamic and verifiable injury device. J Neurotrauma 1992; 9:129-31. 10. Rivlin AS, Tator CH. Effect of duration of acute spinal cord compression in a new acute cord injury model in the rat. Surg Neurol 1978; 10:38-43. 11. Joshi M, Fehlings MG. Development and characterization of a novel, graded model of clip compressive spinal cord injury in the mouse: Part 1. Clip design, behavioral outcomes, and histopathology. J Neurotrauma 2002; 19:175-90. 12. Fiford RJ, Bilston LE, Waite P, et al. A vertebral dislocation model of spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21:451-8. 13. Kwon BK, Oxland TR, Tetzlaff W. Animal models used in spinal cord regeneration research. Spine 2002; 27:1504-10. 14. Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, Tetzlaff W. Strategies to Promote Neural Repair and Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury. Spine 2005; 30(17S):3-13. 15. Hugenholtz H, Cass DE, Dvorak MF, et al. High-dose methylprednisolone for acute closed spinal cord injury: only a treatment option. Can J Neurol Sci 2002; 29:227-35. 16. Apuzzo M. Pharmacological therapy after acute cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery 2002; 50:63-72. 17. Gillis JC, Brogden R. Ketorolac. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in pain management. Drugs 1997; 53:139-88. 1