SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the performance of airtraq and macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and challenging airway management

Airtraq ile macintosh laringoskopların normal ve zor hava yolunda entübasyon etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Sezai ÖZKAN
Güner DAĞLI
Kamer DERE
Ertan TEKSÖZ
Hüseyin ŞEN
Pages
168–174
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: When compared with AK and MK groups, in Group A and Group M, time to the insertion of blade in mouth were shorter and intergroup difference was statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to compare the performance intubation efficacies of Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and challenging airway management simulations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Two-hundred ASA I-II patients aged between 20 and 55 years scheduled for elective surgery were included in the study and they were divided randomly into 4 groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: When compared with AK and MK groups, in Group A and Group M, time to the insertion of blade in mouth were shorter and intergroup difference was statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to compare the performance intubation efficacies of Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and challenging airway management simulations. Material and Method: Two-hundred ASA I-II patients aged between 20 and 55 years scheduled for elective surgery were included in the study and they were divided randomly into 4 groups. Patients in Group A (n=50) were intubated with Airtraq, in Group AK (n=50) with Airtraq and cervical collars, in Group M (n=50) with Macintosh laryngoscopes, and in Group MK (n=50) with Macintosh laryngoscopes and cervical collars. The time to placement of the blade in mouth, to complete visualization the larynx, to the placement of the tracheal tube and the total intubation were recorded by an independent observer. The success rate of intubation, intubation difficulty score, users’ performance score and the observed complications were also recorded. Results: When compared with AK and MK groups, in Group A and Group M, time to the insertion of blade in mouth were shorter and intergroup difference was statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Normal ve zor hava yolu simülasyonunda Airtraq ile Macintosh laringoskopların entübasyon etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmasını amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya, 20–55 yaş arası, elektif cerrahi girişim planlanan, ASA I-II, 200 hasta alınması planlandı. Olgular rasgele 4 gruba ayrıldı. Grup A’daki olgular (n=50) Airtraq kullanılarak, Grup AK’deki olgular (n=50) Airtraq ve servikal kolar kullanılarak, Grup M’deki olgular (n=50) Macintosh laringoskop kullanılarak ve Grup MK’deki olgular (n=50) Macintosh laringoskop ve servikal kolar kullanılarak entübe edildi. Tüm olgularda; laringoskopların ağız içerisine yerleştirme süresi, larenksin görüntülenme süresi, entübasyon tüpünün yerleştirilme süresi ve toplam entübasyon süresi, bağımsız bir gözlemci tarafından kaydedildi. Tüm olguların entübasyon başarı oranı, entübasyon güçlük skoru ve kullanıcı performans değerleri ile, izlenen komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Bulgular: Laringoskopların ağız içi yerleştirme süreleri Grup A ve M’de, Grup AK ve MK’ye göre daha kısaydı ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, S., DAĞLI, G., DERE, K., TEKSÖZ, E., ŞEN, H. (2022). Comparison of the performance of airtraq and macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and challenging airway management. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 168–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/619929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1990;72:828-33
  2. Cheney FW. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project: what have we learned, how has it affected practice, and how will it affect practice in the future?Anesthesiology 1999;91:552-6
  3. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, et al. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:33-9
  4. Mort TC. Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: a report on patient morbidity. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2005;17:255-62
  5. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth and Analg 2004;99:607-13
  6. Sethuraman D, Darshane S, Guha A, Charters P. A randomized, crossover study of the Dorges, McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope blades in a simulated difficult intubation scenario Anaesthesia 2006;61:482-7
  7. Jephcott A. The Macintosh laryngoscope. A historical note on its clinical and commercial development. Anaesthesia 1984;39:474-9
  8. Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy - a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2006;61:469-77
  9. Maharaj CH, Ni Chonghaile M, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Tracheal intubation by inexperienced medical residents using the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes-a manikin study. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2006;24:769-74
  10. Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesia 2006;61:671-7
  11. Woollard M, Mannion W, Lighton D, et al. Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in a model of difficult intubation by prehospital providers not previously trained in laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1061-5
  12. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1290-7
  13. Maharaj CH, O’Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia 2006;61:1093-9
  14. Maharaj CH, Costel