Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of truview and macintosh laryngoscopes in the evaluation of vocalcords

Vokal kortların değerlendirilmesinde truview ile macintosh laringoskopların karşılaştırılması

Pages
359–365
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that in the visualization of vocal cords Truview laryngoscope might be the preferred instrument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study our aim was to evaluate movements of vocal cords by comparing Macintosh and Truview video laryngoscopes following thyroidectomy operations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This study was realized on 20 patients scheduled for thyroidectomy operations after obtaining approval of the ethics committee and patients’ written informed consent All patients were given via IV route 5 mg/kg thiopental, 1.5 µg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium bromide for anaesthesia induction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that in the visualization of vocal cords Truview laryngoscope might be the preferred instrument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study our aim was to evaluate movements of vocal cords by comparing Macintosh and Truview video laryngoscopes following thyroidectomy operations. Material and Methods: This study was realized on 20 patients scheduled for thyroidectomy operations after obtaining approval of the ethics committee and patients’ written informed consent All patients were given via IV route 5 mg/kg thiopental, 1.5 µg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium bromide for anaesthesia induction. Intubations were performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope blade. Durations of intubations and Cormack and Lehane (C-L) scores were recorded. The patients who breathed spontaneously were extubated at the end of the operation. The movements of vocal cords were firstly evaluated with Truview video laryngoscope and then immediately with Macintosh laryngoscope Durations of these procedures, and C-L scores were recorded. Results: Truview laryngoscope was better than Macintosh laryngoscope in the visualization of vocal cords following extubation (p=0.016). C-L scores were different for two laryngoscopes (p=0.016). Any significant difference between durations of these two laryngoscopic procedures was not found (p=0.302). Conclusion: As a result, Truview EVO2® video laryngoscope is better than Macintosh laryngoscopes for the evaluation of the movements of vocal cords. It was concluded that in the visualization of vocal cords Truview laryngoscope might be the preferred instrument.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmada tiroit ameliyatları sonrası vokal kord hareketlerinin değerlendirmesinde Macintosh ve Truview EVO2® video laringoskopların karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, etik kurul onayı ve hasta onamı alındıktan sonra, tiroidektomi operasyonu planlanan 20 hastada gerçekleştirildi. Bütün olgulara anestezi indüksiyonu amacıyla tiyopental 5 mg kg-1, fentanil 1,5 µg kg-1, roküronyum bromür 0,6 mg kg-1 intravenöz yolla verildi. Entübasyon Macintosh laringoskop ile gerçekleştirildi. Entübasyon süresi ve Cormack and Lehane (C-L) skoru kaydedildi. Operasyon bitiminde spontan soluyan olgular ekstübe edildi. Ekstübasyon sonrası vokal kort hareketleri önce Truview EVO2® video laringoskop, hemen ardından Macintosh laringoskop ile değerlendirildi. Bu işlemler için geçen süreler, C-L skorları kaydedildi.Bulgular: Ekstübasyon sonrası kort vokallerin görüntülenmesinde Truview Macintosh laringoskopa göre daha başarılıydı (p=0,016). İki laringoskop arasında C-L skorları farklı bulundu (p=0,016). Laringoskopi süreleri arasında iki laringoskopi yöntemi arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0,302).Sonuç: Tiroit ameliyatları sonrasında vokal kort hareketleri değerlendirilmesinde Truview EVO2® video laringoskop, Macintosh laringoskoptan daha başarılı olarak değerlendirilmiştir ve vokal kord görüntülemesinde seçilebilecek bir araç olabileceği kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUSLU, B., SERT, H., GÖZDEMİR, M., YAZICIOĞLU, R. İ., USTA, B. (2022). Comparison of truview and macintosh laryngoscopes in the evaluation of vocalcords. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6, 359–365. https://ajindex.com/articles/619916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hemmerling TM, Schmidt J, Bosert C, Jacobi KE, Klein P. Intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in 151 consecutive patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;93:396-9
  2. Eltzschig HK, Posner M, Moore FD. The use of readily available equipment in a simple method for intraoperative monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve function during thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 2002;137:452-7
  3. Lai HY, Chen IH, Chen A, F. Y. Hwang FY, Lee Y. The use of the GlideScope for tracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Anaesth 2006;97(3):419–22
  4. Weiss M, Hartmann K, Fischer JE, Gerber AC. Use of angulated videintubation laryngoscope in children undergoing manual in-line neck stabilization. Br J Anaesth 2001;87(3):453-8
  5. Gotou M, Inoue T. Application of the Truview EV02 optical laryngoscope to patients with cervical spinal disease. J Anesth 2007;21(2):295-6
  6. Nasim S, Maharaj CH, Butt I et al. Comparison of the Airtraq(R) and Truview(R) laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins. BMC Emerg Med 2009;9(1):2
  7. Miceli L, Cecconi M, Tripi G, Zauli M, Della Rocca G. Evaluation of new laryngoscope blade for tracheal intubation, Truview EVO2: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25(6):446-9
  8. Li JB, Xiong YC, Wang XL, et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2007;62(9):940-3
  9. Barak M, Philipchuck P, Abecassis P, Katz Y. A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients. Anaesthesia 2007;62(8):827-31
  10. Matsumoto S, Asai T, Shingu K. Truview video laryngoscope in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg 2006;103(2):492-3
  11. Markowitz SD, White PF, Issioui T, et al. Initial evaluation of a new optic laryngoscope blade. J Clin Anesth 2002;14:604-7
  12. McMorrow RCN, Mirakhur RK. A new mirrored laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2003;58:998-1002
  13. Malik MA, O’Donoghue C, Carney J, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth 2009;102(1):128-34
  14. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2008;101(5):723-30.