Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of macintosh and truview evo2 laryngoscope usage in adult patients who undergoing cervical disc surgery

Servikal disk hernisi ameliyatı geçirecek erişkin hastalarda macintosh ve truview evo2 laringoskop kullanımının karşılaştırılması

Pages
27–32
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: While the Cormack Lehane scores were significantly lower (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the Macintosh and Truview EVO2 laryngoscopeduring intubation in adult patients undergoing cervical disc surgery with neck immobilization using cervical collar.Material and Methods: After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, and written informed consent of thepatients, 80 ASA I, II, III patients who would undergo cervical disc surgery were allocated randomly into two groups.After cervical collar placement, patients were intubated either Truview EVO2 or Macintosh laryngoscopes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients’thyromental distance, Wilson, Mallampati and Cormack Lehane scores, duration of intubations, the number of intuba tion attempts, unsuccessful intubations, dental and lip injuries were noted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: While the Cormack Lehane scores were significantly lower (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the Macintosh and Truview EVO2 laryngoscopeduring intubation in adult patients undergoing cervical disc surgery with neck immobilization using cervical collar.Material and Methods: After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, and written informed consent of thepatients, 80 ASA I, II, III patients who would undergo cervical disc surgery were allocated randomly into two groups.After cervical collar placement, patients were intubated either Truview EVO2 or Macintosh laryngoscopes. Patients’thyromental distance, Wilson, Mallampati and Cormack Lehane scores, duration of intubations, the number of intuba tion attempts, unsuccessful intubations, dental and lip injuries were noted. Results: While the Cormack Lehane scores were significantly lower (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, servikal kolar ile boyun hareketleri kısıtlanan servikal disk hernisi ameliyatı geçirecekerişkin hastalarda entübasyon sırasında Macintosh ve Truview EVO2 laringoskopların etkinliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Etik kurul onayı ve imzalı hasta onamı alındıktan sonra ASA I-II-III sınıfından servikal disk hernisiameliyatı geçirecek 80 hasta rasgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Servikal kolar takılıp ya Truview EVO2 ya da Macintosh laringos kopla entübe edildi. Hastaların tiromental mesafe, Wilson, Mallampati ve Cormack Lehane skorları, entübasyon süresi,entübasyonun kaçıncı denemede gerçekleştirildiği, entübasyondan sonra diş, dudak yaralanması ve başarısız entübas yon olup olmadığı kaydedildi.Bulgular: Truview EVO2 grubunda Cormack Lehane skoru Macintosh grubuna göre anlamlı düzeyde azken(p

🔖

Cite This Article

VEHİD, H., TUNALI, Y., KAYA, G., AKÇIL, E. F., UTKU, T., TÜTÜNCÜ, A. Ç., DİLMEN, Ö. K., YENTÜR, E. (2022). Comparison of macintosh and truview evo2 laryngoscope usage in adult patients who undergoing cervical disc surgery. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/619778

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Tse JC, Rimm EB, and Hussain A. Predicting diffi cult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anesthesia: a prospective blind study. Anesth Analg 1995
  2. 81(2):254-8. PMid:7618711 2. Smith CE, et al. Evaluation of tracheal intuba tion difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 1999
  3. 91(5):1253-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199911000- 00015 PMid:10551574 3. Wilson ME, et al. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1988
  4. 61(2):211-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/61.2.211 PMid:3415893 4. Mallampati SR, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985
  5. 32(4):429-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03011357 PMid:4027773 5. Samsoon GL, and Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987
  6. 42(5):487-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987. tb04039.x PMid:3592174 6. Cormack RS, and Lehane J. Difficult trac heal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984
  7. 39(11):1105-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984. tb08932.x PMid:6507827 7. Barak M, et al. A comparison of the Truview bla de with the Macintosh blade in adult patients. Anaesthesia 2007
  8. 62(8):827-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05143.x PMid:17635433 8. Li JB, et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2007
  9. 62(9):940-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05182.x PMid:17697223 9. Matsumoto S, Asai T, and Shingu K. Truview vi deo laryngoscope in patients with difficult air ways. Anesth Analg 2006
  10. 103(2):492-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000227064.72260.19 10. Singh I, Khaund A, and Gupta A. Evaluation of Truview EVO2 Laryngoscope In Anticipated Dif ficult Intubation - A Comparison To Macintosh Laryngoscope. Indian J Anaesth 2009
  11. 53(2):164-8. PMid:20640117 PMCid:2900100 11. Darshane S, et al. Validation of a model of graded difficulty in Laerdal SimMan: functio nal comparisons between Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope Video Laryngoscope and Airt raq. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(3):175-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e328340c383 PMid:21088593 12. Malik MA, et al. Comparison of Macintosh, Tru view EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope lary ngoscope use in patients with cervical spine im mobilization. Br J Anaesth 2008
  12. 101(5):723-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen231 PMid:18784069 13. Tutuncu AC, Kaya G, Tunali Y, Altintas F and Dilmen OK.