Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 6

The effects of sevoflurane, desflurane and propofol on chemotactic functions of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage

Bronkoalveolar lavaj (Bal) sıvısındaki nötrofillerin kemotaktik fonksiyonları üzerine sevofluran, desfluran ve propofal anestezisinin etkileri

Pages
413–419
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In group S before and after administration of sevoflurane, there were no statistically significant difference between BACR and SACR.Conclusion: This study showed that sevoflurane was the least effective agent on chemotaxis of BAL neutrofils.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: We aimed to investigate the effects of anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane or propofol on chemotactic activity of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) material using with flow cytometry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study includes thirty patients ages ranging from 18 to 40 with ASA class I.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In group S before and after administration of sevoflurane, there were no statistically significant difference between BACR and SACR.Conclusion: This study showed that sevoflurane was the least effective agent on chemotaxis of BAL neutrofils.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to investigate the effects of anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane or propofol on chemotactic activity of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) material using with flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: The study includes thirty patients ages ranging from 18 to 40 with ASA class I. The patients were divided into three group (Group D=Desflurane, Group S=Sevoflurane, Group P=Propofol). All patients were premedicated with diazepam and atropin. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 values and minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane and sevoflurane were recorded. 2-3 mg kg-1 propofol, 1 mcg kg-1 fentanyl and 0,6 mg kg-1 rocuronium bromur were administered to all patients in the induction of anesthesia. The anesthesia was maintained with inhalation agent (1-1,5 MAC) or propofol (the starting dose 12 mg kg-1 of propofol infusion was reduced to 9, 6 and a final 4 mg kg-1). Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed immediately after induction of anesthesia and surgical procedure by fiberoptic bronchoscop. The basal active cell ratios (BACR) and N-formyl-met-leu-phe (fMLP)-stimulated active cell ratios before and after anesthesia were determined by flow cytometry in BAL neutrophils.Results: Demografic properties, durations of anesthesia and surgery and hemodynamic parameters were similar between the groups. In group P, the basal active cell ratios (BACR) before administration of propofol compared to the BACR after administration of propofol were high. After propofol anesthesia, the fMLP-stimulated active cell ratios (SACR) were significantly higher than the BACR. In group D, after desflurane anesthesia the SACR were significantly higher than the BACR. In group S before and after administration of sevoflurane, there were no statistically significant difference between BACR and SACR.Conclusion: This study showed that sevoflurane was the least effective agent on chemotaxis of BAL neutrofils.

Özet

Amaç: Desfluran, sevofluran veya propofol ile gerçekleştirilen anestezi uygulamasının, bronkoalveolar lavaj (BAL) materyalindeki nötrofillerin kemotaktik fonksiyonları üzerine olan etkilerini akımsitometri yöntemi ile değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: ASA I grubu, 18-40 yaş arasında, 30 hasta rasgele üç gruba (Grup D=Desfluran, Grup S=Sevofluran, Grup P=Propofol) ayrıldı. Hastalar diazepam ve atropin ile premedike edildi. Hastaların sistolik ve diastolik arter basıncı, oksijen saturasyonu ve end-tidal CO2 değerleri ile desfluran ve sevofluranın minimum alveoler konsantrasyon ve % değerleri kaydedildi. Anestezi indüksiyonunda tüm hastalara 2-3 mg kg-1 propofol 1 mcg kg-1 fentanil ve 0.6 mg kg-1 rokuronyum bromür uygulandı. Anestezi idamesinde inhalasyon ajanları 1-1,5 MAC olacak şekilde, propofol infüzyonu ise, 12 mg kg-1 dozunda başlanıp 9, 6 ve sonunda 4 mg kg-1 dozuna düşürülerek uygulandı. Fiberoptik bronkoskopla indüksiyondan ve operasyon bitiminden hemen sonra bronkoalveolar lavaj yapıldı. Elde edilen BAL örneklerindeki nötrofillerin, bazal (BAHO) ve N-formil-met-leu-phe (fMLP) ile uyarılmış (UAHO) aktive hücre oranları akım sitometrik yöntemle ölçüldü. Bulgular: Hastaların demografik özellikleri, anestezi/cerrahi süreleri ve hemodinamik bulgular gruplar arasında benzerdi. Grup P’de propofol verilmeden önceki bazal aktive hücre oranları (BAHO), propofol uygulaması sonrası BAHO ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksekti. Propofol anestezisi sonrasında N-formil-met-leu-phe (fMLP) ile uyarılmış aktive hücre oranları (UAHO), BAHO’na göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Grup D’de desfluran anestezisi sonrasında UAHO’ları, BAHO’larına göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Grup S’de sevofluran verilmesinden önce ve sonra, BAHO ve UAHO arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları BAL nötrofillerinin kemotaksi fonksiyonu üzerine en az etkili ajanın sevofluran olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

RESİSLİ, İ., OTELCİOĞLU, Ş., REİSLİ, R., ACAT, C., EROL, A., TOPAL, A. (2022). The effects of sevoflurane, desflurane and propofol on chemotactic functions of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 6, 413–419. https://ajindex.com/articles/618662

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Homburger JA, Meiler SE. Anesthesia drugs, immunity, and long- term outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19:423-428
  2. Çelebioğlu B, Özer E. Anestezik ajanlar ve immün sistem. Anestezi Dergisi 2003; 11(4):235-241
  3. Katsuya M, Hirohiko A, Kahoru N, et al. Propofol Inhibits Human Neutrophil Functions. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:695-700
  4. Davidson AH, Boom SJ, Pearsall FJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of four iv anaesthetic agents on polymorphonuclear leucocyte function. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74:315-318
  5. Kelbel I, Weiss M. Anaesthetics and immune function. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2001; 14:685-691
  6. Nagata T, Kansha M, Irita K, et al. Propofol inhibits FMLP-stimulated phosphorylation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase and chemotaxis in human neutrophils. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:853-858
  7. Skoutelis A, Lianou P, Papageorgiou E, et al. Effects of propofol and thiopentone on polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions in vitro. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38(8):858-862
  8. Jensen AG, Dahlgren C, Eintrei C. Propofol decreases random and chemotactic stimulated locomotion of human neutrophils in vitro. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70:99-100
  9. O’Donnell NG, McSharry CP, Wilkinson PC, et al. Comparison of the inhibitory effect of propofol, thiopentone and midazolam on neutrophil polarization in vitro in the presence or absence of human serum albumin. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:70-4
  10. Moudgil GC, Allan RB, Russel RJ, et al. Inhibition, by anaesthetic agents, of human leucocytis locomotion towards chemical attractanst. Br J Anaesth 1977; 49(2):97-105
  11. Moudgil GC, Gordon J, Forrest JB. Comparative effects of volatile anaesthetic agents and nitrous oxide on human leucocyte chemotaxic in vitro. Can Anaesh Soc J 1984; 31(6):631-637
  12. Goto Y, Ho SL, McAdoo J, et al. General versus regional anaesthesia for cataract surgery: effects on neutropil apoptosis and the postoperative proinflammatory state. Eur J Anaesthhesiol 2000; 17(8):474-480
  13. Dagan D, Segal S. Effect of anaesthesia on the immune system supression of the immunogenic capacity of macrophages and lymphocyte transformation. Immunol Invest 1989; 18:975-9.