SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Theoretical Frameworks, Methods, and Procedures for ConductingPhenomenological Studies in Educational Settings

Eğitim Ortamlarında Fenomenal Çalışmaları Yürütmek İçinTeorik Çerçeveler, Yöntemler ve Prosedürler

Soner YILDIRIM
Pelin YÜKSEL
Pages
1–20
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The second part provides guidance for aphenomenological research in education settings, focusing particularly on phenomenological datacollection procedure and phenomenological data analysis methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purposes of phenomenological research are to seek reality from individuals narrativesof their experiences and feelings, and to produce in-depth descriptions of the phenomenon.Phenomenological research studies in educational settings generally embody lived experience,perception, and feelings of participants about a phenomenon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to provide a generalframework for researchers who are interested in phenomenological studies especially ineducational setting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The second part provides guidance for aphenomenological research in education settings, focusing particularly on phenomenological datacollection procedure and phenomenological data analysis methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purposes of phenomenological research are to seek reality from individuals narrativesof their experiences and feelings, and to produce in-depth descriptions of the phenomenon.Phenomenological research studies in educational settings generally embody lived experience,perception, and feelings of participants about a phenomenon. This study aims to provide a generalframework for researchers who are interested in phenomenological studies especially ineducational setting. Additionally, the study provides a guide for researchers on how to conduct aphenomenological research and how to collect and analyze phenomenal data. The first part of thepaper explains the underpinnings of the research methodology consisting of methodologicalframework and key phenomenological concepts. The second part provides guidance for aphenomenological research in education settings, focusing particularly on phenomenological datacollection procedure and phenomenological data analysis methods.

Özet

Fenomenolojik araştırmaların temel amacı, bireyin deneyimlerinden ve duygularından yola çıkarakbelli bir fenomenan üzerinde yaptığı anlatılarında gerçeği aramak ve bu fenomenana yönelikderinlemesine açıklamalar üretmektir. Eğitim ortamlarında fenomenolojik araştırmalar genelliklearaştırmaya katılanların belli bir fenomenan hakkında yaşantıları, deneyimleri, algıları veduyguları somutlaştırmak için kullanılır. Bu çalışma, özellikle eğitim ortamlarında fenomenolojikçalışmalarla ilgilenen araştırmacılar için genel bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca,çalışmada fenomenolojik araştırmalar için veri toplamak ve bu fenomenal verileri analiz yapmakiçin araştırmacılara yön gösterici bir kılavuz olarak sunmak hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümümetodolojik çerçeve ve anahtar kavramlardan oluşan fenomenolojik araştırma metodolojisinin temellerini açıklamaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise özellikle eğitim ortamlarında bir fenomenolojikaraştırma yapmak isteyen araştırmacılara yönelik fenomenolojik veri toplama prosedürü vefenomenolojik veri analiz yöntemlerinin basamakları sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, S., YÜKSEL, P. (2022). Theoretical Frameworks, Methods, and Procedures for ConductingPhenomenological Studies in Educational Settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/617102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ashworth, P. (1999). "Bracketing" in phenomenology: Renouncing assumptions in hearing about student cheating. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(6), 707-721.
  2. Beech, I. (1999). Bracketing in phenomenological research. Nurse Researcher, 6(3), 33-35
  3. Cilesiz, S. (2006). Phenomenological investigation of adolescents’ experiences of educational uses of computers at Internet cafés (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Florida Cilesiz, S. (2009). Educational computer use in leisure contexts: A phenomenological study of adolescents' experiences at Internet cafes. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1) 232-274.
  4. Cilesiz, S. (2010). A phenomenological approach to experiences with technology: current state, promise, and future directions for research. Educational Technology Research and Development DOI: 10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
  5. Creswell, J.W.(2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among f ive approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. B. (2000). Interpretive Practice and Social Action. In N. Denzin & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 483-505) -Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Husserl, E (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin. Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigation (Vols. 1 - 2) (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Humanities Press.
  6. Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data, Human Studies, 8(3), 279-303.
  7. Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  8. Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282 –292. Kolkelmans. J. J. (Ed.), (1967)
  9. Phenomenology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Kvale, S. (1996).
  10. InterViews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Harlow: Pearson Education. Lauer, Q. (1967). On evidence. In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenology (pp. 83-105).
  11. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Merriam, S. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability of qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lif elong Learning, 4, 51-60.
  12. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: