Based on the consumption of rice or barley, stool consistency did not change.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 30 mixed-breed, neutered, young adult male dogs at 15 30 kg live weights were used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dog food produced using 25% barley had a gelatinized starch content significantly greater than that of food producedusing 25% rice: 18.36% vs. 17.45%, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the consumption of rice or barley, stool consistency did not change.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, 30 mixed-breed, neutered, young adult male dogs at 15 30 kg live weights were used. The foods were producedat a special facility. Dog food produced using 25% barley had a gelatinized starch content significantly greater than that of food producedusing 25% rice: 18.36% vs. 17.45%, respectively. No considerable difference was observed in the dogs preference between the two foods(50.95% vs. 49.05%). Dry matter digestibility of rice and barley food was 86.10% and 83.85% and crude protein digestibility was 80.44%and 79.24%, respectively. Based on the consumption of rice or barley, stool consistency did not change.
🔖
Cite This Article
KAHRAMAN, O., POLAT, E. S., İNAL, F., GÜRBÜZ, E., İNAL, Ş., ULUDAĞ, M., ALATAŞ, M. S. (2022). Barley as an alternative to rice in dog food. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 770–774. https://ajindex.com/articles/615011
Watson H. Cereals in pet foods, Dogs in Canada Magazine November; 2005
McCleary BV, Charnock SJ, Rossiter PC, OShea MF, Power AM, Lloyd RM. Measurement of carbohydrates in grain, feed and food. J Sci Food Agric 2006; 86: 1648-1661
Cipollini I. Pet food: quality and quality improvement. PhD, Università di Bologna, AGR, 2008
Bednar GE, Platil AR, Murray SM, Grieshop CM, Merchen NR, Fahey GC Jr. Starch and fiber fractions in selected food and feed ingredients affect their small intestinal digestibility and fermentability and their large bowel fermentability in vitro in a canine model. J Nutr 2001; 131: 276-286
Carciofi AC, Vasconcellos RS, Oliveira LD, Brunetto MA, Valério AG, Bazolli RS, Carrilho ENVM, Prada F. Chromic oxide as a digestibility marker for dogs -a comparison of methods of analysis. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2007; 134: 273-282
Holm J, Björck I, Eliasson AC. Effects of thermal processing of wheat on starch. I. Physico-chemical and functional properties. J Cereal Sci 1988; 8: 249-269
Goelema JO, Smits A, Vaessen LM, Wemmers A. Effects of pressure toasting, expander treatment and pelleting on in vitro and in situ parameters of protein and starch in a mixture of broken peas, lupins and faba beans. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1999; 78: 109-126
Dust JM, Gajda AM, Flickinger EA, Burkhalter TM, Merchen NR, Fahey GC Jr. Extrusion conditions affect chemical composition and in vitro digestion of select food ingredients. J Agr Food Chem 2004; 52: 2989-2996
De Godoy CMR, Kerr KR, Fahey GC Jr. Alternative dietary fiber sources in companion animal nutrition. Nutrients 2013; 5: 3099-3117
De Godoy CMR. Fish oil and barley supplementation in diets for adult dogs: effects on lipid and protein metabolism, nutrient digestibility, fecal quality, and postprandial glycemia. PhD, University of Kentucky, Kentucky; 2011
Murray SM, Fahey GC Jr, Merchen NR, Sunvold GD, Reinhart GA. Evaluation of selected high-starch flours as ingredients in canine diets. J Anim Sci 1999; 77: 2180-2186
Murray SM, Flickinger EA, Patil AR, Merchen NR, Brent JL Jr, Fahey GC Jr. In vitro fermentation characteristics of native and processed cereal grains and potato starch using ileal chyme from dogs. J Anim Sci 2001; 79: 435-444
Hutton J. How to test palatability. Feed International 2002; 14- 7
Dust JM, Grieshop CM, Parsons CM, Karr-Lilienthal LK, Schasteen CSCS, Quigley JD, Merchen NR, Fahey GC Jr. Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability,