Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Multiple-line study of molecular gas in spiral galaxy NGC 2903

Pages
706–720
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both methods, i.e. the line ratio diagnostics and modeling, indicate an ISM inthe center of NGC 2903 having intermediate temperature and star formation activity (also supported by star formationrates), thinner CO gas with similar dense gas fraction, and higher H2 volume number density compared to that of spirals,ETGs, and starbursts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Multiple molecular lines with radiative transfer modeling are a powerful tool to probe the physics of starforming gas in galaxies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigate the gas properties in the center of spiral galaxy NGC 2903 using low-J CO lines,i.e. 12 CO(1-0), 12 CO(2-1), 12 CO(3-2), 13 CO(1-0), and HCN(1-0).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both methods, i.e. the line ratio diagnostics and modeling, indicate an ISM inthe center of NGC 2903 having intermediate temperature and star formation activity (also supported by star formationrates), thinner CO gas with similar dense gas fraction, and higher H2 volume number density compared to that of spirals,ETGs, and starbursts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Multiple molecular lines with radiative transfer modeling are a powerful tool to probe the physics of starforming gas in galaxies. We investigate the gas properties in the center of spiral galaxy NGC 2903 using low-J CO lines,i.e. 12 CO(1-0), 12 CO(2-1), 12 CO(3-2), 13 CO(1-0), and HCN(1-0). We apply a nonlocal thermodynamic equilibriumradiative transfer code to derive beam-averaged molecular gas properties. We use two methods (i.e. χ2 minimizationand likelihood) to define the best model representing the observed line ratios best. The line ratio diagnostics suggest thatCO gas in the center of NGC 2903 is thinner and the dense gas fraction is similar compared to that of spirals, starbursts,and early-type galaxies (ETGs), while the gas in the center of the galaxy is warmer than that of ETGs and colder thanthat of starbursts. Based on the best-fitting model results, we find that the beam-averaged gas kinetic temperature isTK = 20 K, H2 volume number density is log(n(H2)) = 4.2 cm −3, and CO column number density is log(N (CO)) =19.0 cm −2in the center of NGC 2903. Both methods, i.e. the line ratio diagnostics and modeling, indicate an ISM inthe center of NGC 2903 having intermediate temperature and star formation activity (also supported by star formationrates), thinner CO gas with similar dense gas fraction, and higher H2 volume number density compared to that of spirals,ETGs, and starbursts.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, S. (2022). Multiple-line study of molecular gas in spiral galaxy NGC 2903. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 706–720. https://ajindex.com/articles/613996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Swings, P.; Rosenfeld, L. Astrophys. J. 1937, 86, 483-486
  2. Weinreb, S.; Barrett, A. H.; Meeks, M. L.; Henry, J. C. Nature 1963, 200, 829-831
  3. Cheung, A. C.; Rank, D. M.; Townes, C. H.; Thornton, D. D.; Welch, W. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1968, 21, 1701-1705
  4. Cheung, A. C.; Rank, D. M.; Townes, C. H.; Thornton, D. D.; Welch, W. J. Nature 1969, 221,626-628
  5. Wilson, R. W.; Jefferts, K. B.; Penzias, A. A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1970, 161, 43-44
  6. Rickard, L. J.; Palmer, P.; Morris, M.; Zuckerman, B.; Turner, B. E. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1975, 199, 75-78
  7. Solomon, P. M.; de Zafra, R. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1975, 199, 79-83
  8. Phillips, T. G.; Ellison, B. N.; Keene, J. B.; Leighton, R. B.; Howard, R. J.; Masson, C. R.; Sanders, D. B.; Veidt, B.; Young, K. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1987, 322, 73-77
  9. Wiklind, T.; Rydbeck, G. Astron. Astrophys. 1986, 164, 22-24
  10. Ward-Thomson, D.; Whitworth, A. P. An Introduction to Star Formation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011
  11. Bolatto, A. D.; Wolfire, M.; Leroy, A. K. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astr. 2013, 51, 207-268
  12. Makarov, D.; Prugniel, P.; Terekhova, N.; Courtois, H.; Vauglin, I. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 570, 13-24
  13. Heesen, V.; Brinks, E.; Leroy, A. K.; Heald, G.; Braun, R.; Bigiel, F.; Beck, R. Astron. J. 2014, 147, 103-141
  14. Robitaille, T. P.; Whitney, B. A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2010, 710, 11-15. [15] van der Tak, F. F. S.; Black, J. H.; Schoier, F. L.; Jansen, D. J.; van Dishoeck, E. F. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 468, 627-635
  15. Goldreich, P.; Kwan, J. Astrophys. J. 1974, 189, 441-454. [17] de Jong, T.; Chu, S.; Dalgarno, A. Astrophys. J. 1975, 199, 69-78
  16. Helfer, T. T.; Thornley, M. D.; Regan, M. W.; Wong, T.; Sheth, K.; Vogel, S. N.; Blitz, L.; Bock, D. C. J. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 2003, 145, 259-327
  17. Leroy, A. K.; Walter, F.; Bigiel, F.; Usero, A.; Weiss, A.; Brinks, E.; de Blok, W. J. G.; Kennicutt, R. C.; Schuster, Karl-Friedrich; Kramer, C. et al. Astron. J. 2009, 137, 4670-4696
  18. Mao, R. Q.; Schulz, A.; Henkel, C.; Mauersberger, R.; Muders, D.; Dinh, V. T. Astrophys. J. 2010, 724, 1336-1356
  19. Muraoka, K.; Sorai, K.; Kuno, N.; Nakai, N.; Nakanishi, H.; Takeda, M.; Yanagitani, K.; Kaneko, H.; Miyamoto, Y.; Kishida, N. et al. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2016, 68, 89-102
  20. Gao, Y.; Solomon, P. M. Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. 2004, 152, 63-80
  21. Sault, R. J.; Teuben, P. J.; Wright, M. C. H. In ASP Conference Series: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Sy