Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

An investigation of the bactericidal activity of chlorhexidine digluconateagainst multidrug-resistant hospital isolates

Pages
903–909
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Quantitative suspension test results showed that 4% chlorhexidine digluconate was effective against antibiotic resistant and susceptible bacteria after 5 min of contact time and can be safely used in our hospital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Hospital infections are among the most prominent medical problems around the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The susceptibility of 120 hospital isolated strains of 7 bacterial genera against chlorhexidine digluconate was determined by agar dilution test, using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and the EN 1040 Basic Bactericidal Activity Test to determine the bactericidal activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Quantitative suspension test results showed that 4% chlorhexidine digluconate was effective against antibiotic resistant and susceptible bacteria after 5 min of contact time and can be safely used in our hospital.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Hospital infections are among the most prominent medical problems around the world. Using proper biocides in an appropriate way is critically important in overcoming this problem. Several reports have suggested that microorganisms may develop resistance or reduce their susceptibility to biocides, similar to the case with antibiotics. In this study we aimed to determine the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine digluconate against clinical isolates. Materials and methods: The susceptibility of 120 hospital isolated strains of 7 bacterial genera against chlorhexidine digluconate was determined by agar dilution test, using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and the EN 1040 Basic Bactericidal Activity Test to determine the bactericidal activity. According to MIC values, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were found to be less susceptible to chlorhexidine digluconate. Results: Quantitative suspension test results showed that 4% chlorhexidine digluconate was effective against antibiotic resistant and susceptible bacteria after 5 min of contact time and can be safely used in our hospital. However, concentrations below 4% chlorhexidine digluconate caused a decrease in bactericidal activity, especially for Staphylococcus aureus and P. aeruginosa. Conclusion: It is crucial to use biocides at appropriate concentrations and to perform surveillance studies to trace resistance or low susceptibility patterns of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and other hospital isolates.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIROĞLU, M., HASÇELİK, A. G., EKİZOĞLU, M., KILIÇ, E. (2022). An investigation of the bactericidal activity of chlorhexidine digluconateagainst multidrug-resistant hospital isolates. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 903–909. https://ajindex.com/articles/610703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. European Union Biocidal Products Regulation. EU Biocides Regulation 528/2012. Health and Safety Executive. Biocides. Brussels, Belgium: EU; 2012
  2. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12: 147–179
  3. Russell AD. Biocide usage and antibiotic resistance: the relevance of laboratory findings to clinical and environmental situations. Lancet Infect Dis 2003; 3:794–803
  4. Horner C, Mawer D, Wilcox M. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in staphylocci: is it increasing and does it matter? J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 2547–2559
  5. Maillard JY. Bacterial resistance to biocides in the healthcare environment: should it be of genuine concern? J Hosp Infect 2007; 65: 60–72
  6. Russell AD. Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems. J Hosp Infect 1998; 43 (Suppl.): S57–S68
  7. Harbarth S, Soh Tuan S, Horner C, Wilcox MH. Is reduced susceptibility to disinfectants and antiseptics a risk in healthcare settings? A point/counterpoint review. J Hosp Infect 2014; 87: 194–202
  8. McBain AJ, Gilbert P. Biocide tolerance and harbingers of doom. Int Biodeter Biodegr 2001; 47: 55–61
  9. Shiraishi T, Nakagawa Y. Review of disinfectant susceptibility of bacteria isolated in hospital to commonly used disinfectants. Postgrad Med J 1993; 69 (Suppl. 3): S70–77
  10. Vali L, Davies SE, Lai LLG, Dave J, Amyes SGB. Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61: 524–532
  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard. M07-A8. 8th ed. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008
  12. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1040, Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics - Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Basic Bactericidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics - Test Method and Requirements. (Phase 1). Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization; 2005
  13. Ekizoğlu MT, Özalp M, Sultan N, Gür D. An investigation of the bactericidal effect of certain antiseptic/disinfectants against isolates of gram-negative bacteria. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24: 225–227
  14. Reybrouck G. Efficacy of inactivators against 14 disinfectant substances. Zbl