Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Durability and Anti-Biofilm Effects in Urinary Catheters Against Enterococcus faecalis Clinical Isolates and Reference Strains

Pages
546–552
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regarding reduction of biofilm cell counts,a hydrophilic-coated catheter was more effectiveagainst P. aeruginosa, whereas a silver-coated catheterwas found to be more effective against S. epidermidis.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter had the bestantimicrobial durability.Conclusion: Urine isolates of E. faecalis hadconsiderable ability with respect to biofilm formation.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter was the mosteffective against all tested bacteria; however, the effectof a hydrophilic or silver-coated catheter depends on thespecies present in it.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichiacoli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonasaeruginosa and Candida albicans biofilms are majorcauses of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.Antimicrobial-coated or impregnated urinary cathetersare seen as a possible way to prevent these infections.Aims: To determine the biofilm-forming ability of 89E. faecalis isolates from urinary tract infections andto compare several urinary catheters for antimicrobialdurability and the inhibitory effects on biofilm formationof different laboratory strains and clinical isolates of E.faecalis.Study Design: In vitro experimental study.Methods: The biofilm forming ability of E. faecalisisolates was determined by the crystal violet stainingand plate counting methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For comparison of urinarycatheters, biofilms of 45 E. faecalis isolates from thecatheter samples of hospitalized patients and fivelaboratory strains of E. coli ATCC25922, S. epidermidisATCC35984, P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, E. faecalisATCC29212 and C. albicans ATCC90028 were formedon the catheters in 24-well tissue culture plates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regarding reduction of biofilm cell counts,a hydrophilic-coated catheter was more effectiveagainst P. aeruginosa, whereas a silver-coated catheterwas found to be more effective against S. epidermidis.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter had the bestantimicrobial durability.Conclusion: Urine isolates of E. faecalis hadconsiderable ability with respect to biofilm formation.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter was the mosteffective against all tested bacteria; however, the effectof a hydrophilic or silver-coated catheter depends on thespecies present in it.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichiacoli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonasaeruginosa and Candida albicans biofilms are majorcauses of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.Antimicrobial-coated or impregnated urinary cathetersare seen as a possible way to prevent these infections.Aims: To determine the biofilm-forming ability of 89E. faecalis isolates from urinary tract infections andto compare several urinary catheters for antimicrobialdurability and the inhibitory effects on biofilm formationof different laboratory strains and clinical isolates of E.faecalis.Study Design: In vitro experimental study.Methods: The biofilm forming ability of E. faecalisisolates was determined by the crystal violet stainingand plate counting methods. For comparison of urinarycatheters, biofilms of 45 E. faecalis isolates from thecatheter samples of hospitalized patients and fivelaboratory strains of E. coli ATCC25922, S. epidermidisATCC35984, P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, E. faecalisATCC29212 and C. albicans ATCC90028 were formedon the catheters in 24-well tissue culture plates. Scanningelectron microscopy analysis was performed to observebiofilms.Results: All 89 E. faecalis isolates were found to bebiofilm positive. Nitrofurazone-impregnated catheterssignificantly reduced the cell counts of E. faecalisisolates and completely inhibited the formation of P.aeruginosa and S. epidermidis biofilms compared withthe others. Regarding reduction of biofilm cell counts,a hydrophilic-coated catheter was more effectiveagainst P. aeruginosa, whereas a silver-coated catheterwas found to be more effective against S. epidermidis.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter had the bestantimicrobial durability.Conclusion: Urine isolates of E. faecalis hadconsiderable ability with respect to biofilm formation.The nitrofurazone-impregnated catheter was the mosteffective against all tested bacteria; however, the effectof a hydrophilic or silver-coated catheter depends on thespecies present in it.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIROĞLU, M., KALKANCI, A., KART, D., KUSTİMUR, A. S. (2022). Evaluation of Antimicrobial Durability and Anti-Biofilm Effects in Urinary Catheters Against Enterococcus faecalis Clinical Isolates and Reference Strains. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6, 546–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/461178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Choe HS, Son SW, Choi HA, Kim HJ, Ahn SG, Bang JH, et al. Analysis of the distribution of bacteria within urinary catheter biofilms using four different molecular techniques. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:249-54
  2. Coenye T, Nelis HJ. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods 2010;83:89-105
  3. Pereira UA, Barbosa LC, Maltha CR, Demuner AJ, Masood MA, Pimenta AL. Inhibition of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation by highly active lactones and lactams analogues of rubrolides. Eur J Med Chem 2014;82:127-38
  4. Tenke P, Kovacs B, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Matsumoto T, Tambyah PA, Naber KG. European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008;31(Suppl 1):68-78
  5. Pratt RJ, Pellowe CM, Wilson JA, Loveday HP, Harper PJ, Jones SR, et al. epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare- associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect 2007;65(Suppl 1):1-64
  6. Schumm K, Lam TB. Types of urethral catheters for management of shortterm voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:738-46
  7. Desai DG, Liao KS, Cevallos ME, Trautner BW. Silver or nitrofurazone impregnation of urinary catheters has a minimal effect on uropathogen adherence. J Urol 2010;184:2565-71
  8. Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Campoccia D, Creti R, Pirini V, Huebner J, et al. Strong biofilm production, antibiotic multi-resistance and high gelE expression in epidemic clones of Enterococcus faecalis from orthopaedic implant infections. Biomaterials 2008;29:580-6
  9. Guiton PS, Hung CS, Hancock LE, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Immun 2010;78:4166-75
  10. Stickler DJ. Bacterial biofilmsin patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008;5:598-608
  11. Extremina CI, Costa L, Aguiar AI, Peixe L, Fonseca AP. Optimization of processing conditions for the quantification of enterococci biofilms using microtitre-plates. J Microbiol Methods 2011;84:167-73
  12. Chaiban G, Hanna H, Dvorak T, Raad I. A rapid method of impregnating endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters with gendine: a novel antiseptic agent. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:51-6
  13. Wang L, Dong M, Zheng J, Song Q, Yin W, Li J, et al. Relationship of biofilm formation and gelE ge