Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Achene morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance

Pages
208–223
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Twenty-two taxa of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey were examined with a stereomicroscope and scanningelectron microscope (SEM) in order to describe their achene macro- and micromorphologies and to evaluate the diagnostic value ofthese features.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Achene width ranges from 0.26 to 1.68 mm and achene lengthfrom 1.13 to 3.46 mm.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Twenty-two taxa of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey were examined with a stereomicroscope and scanningelectron microscope (SEM) in order to describe their achene macro- and micromorphologies and to evaluate the diagnostic value ofthese features. The achenes are obpyramidal, obconical, and oblong. Achene width ranges from 0.26 to 1.68 mm and achene lengthfrom 1.13 to 3.46 mm. They show variation in color: brown, dark brown, grayish-brown, reddish-brown, purplish-brown, black, andpurplish. All investigated species have slime cells, but prismatic cells on epicarpic cells are found only in two species. Four types ofornamentations were recognized via SEM on achene surface characteristics: reticulate-striate-ruminate, reticulate-striate, reticulateruminate,and reticulate-rugose. Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEK, M. U., VURAL, M., ÖZBEK, F. (2022). Achene morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 208–223. https://ajindex.com/articles/600917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abid R, Qaiser M (2009). Taxonomic significance of the cypsela morphology in the tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae) from Pakistan and Kashmir. Pak J Bot 41: 555-579.
  2. Abid RD, Zehra N (2007). Micromorphology of cypsela and its taxonomic significance of some genera in the tribe Inuleae from Pakistan. Pak J Bot 39: 1407-1416.
  3. Akçin TA, Akçin A (2014). Achene micromorphology of seven taxa of Achillea L. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Bangl J Plant Taxon 21: 19-25.
  4. Barthlott W (1981). Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord J Bot 1: 345-355.
  5. Bhar I, Mukherjee SK (2004). Macromorphological and micromorphological study of cypselas in seven species of the tribe Anthemideae- (Asteraceae). J Econ Taxon Bot 28: 788- 794. Bona M (2015). Systematic implications of achene characteristics in genera Centaurea L., Cyanus Mill., Psephellus Cass. and Rhaponticoides Vaill. (Asteraceae). Bangl J Plant Taxon 22: 125-136.
  6. Boyko EV (1985). On the systematics of Artemisia aurata and Artemisia palustris (Asteraceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 70: 923-925.
  7. Briquet J (1916). Etudes carpologiques sur les genres de Composées Anthemis, Ormenis et Santolina. Annuaire du Conservatoire et du Jardin Botaniques de Genève 18-19: 257-313.
  8. Candan F, Uysal T, Tugay O, Bozkurt M, Ertuğrul K, Demirelma H (2016). The examinations of achene ultrastructural features of section Acrolophus (Centaurea, Asteraceae) via scanning electron microscopy. Turk J Bot 40: 147-163.
  9. Chehregani A, Mahanfar N (2007). Achene micro-morphology of Anthemis (Asteraceae) and its allies in Iran with emphasis on systematics. Int J Agric Biol 9: 486-488.
  10. Coşkunçelebi K, Makbul S, Okur S (2016). Studies on the achene morphology of Turkish species of Scorzonera L. (Asteraceae) using light and scanning electron microscopy. Phytotaxa 247: 1-26.
  11. Davis PH, Hedge IC (1975). The Flora of Turkey; past, present and future. Candollea 30: 331-351.
  12. Dormer KJ (1962). The taxonomic significance of crystal forms in Centaurea. New Phytol 61: 32-35.
  13. Enayet Hossain ABM (1975). Tripleurospermum Schultz Bip. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 5. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 295- 311. Fahn A, Werker E (1972). Anatomical mechanisms of seed dispersal. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Seed Biology, Vol. I. Importance, Development and Germination. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 151-221.
  14. Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Robinson HE (2009). Cl