Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

Achene morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance

Sayfa
208–223
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Twenty-two taxa of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey were examined with a stereomicroscope and scanningelectron microscope (SEM) in order to describe their achene macro- and micromorphologies and to evaluate the diagnostic value ofthese features.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Achene width ranges from 0.26 to 1.68 mm and achene lengthfrom 1.13 to 3.46 mm.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Twenty-two taxa of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey were examined with a stereomicroscope and scanningelectron microscope (SEM) in order to describe their achene macro- and micromorphologies and to evaluate the diagnostic value ofthese features. The achenes are obpyramidal, obconical, and oblong. Achene width ranges from 0.26 to 1.68 mm and achene lengthfrom 1.13 to 3.46 mm. They show variation in color: brown, dark brown, grayish-brown, reddish-brown, purplish-brown, black, andpurplish. All investigated species have slime cells, but prismatic cells on epicarpic cells are found only in two species. Four types ofornamentations were recognized via SEM on achene surface characteristics: reticulate-striate-ruminate, reticulate-striate, reticulateruminate,and reticulate-rugose. Achene size, surface ornamentation, and color are of significant importance in taxonomy of the genusfor distinguishing taxa from each other.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZBEK, M. U., VURAL, M., ÖZBEK, F. (2022). Achene morphology of the genus Cota J.Gay (Asteraceae) from Turkey and its taxonomic significance. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 208–223. https://ajindex.com/articles/600917

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Abid R, Qaiser M (2009). Taxonomic significance of the cypsela morphology in the tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae) from Pakistan and Kashmir. Pak J Bot 41: 555-579.
  2. Abid RD, Zehra N (2007). Micromorphology of cypsela and its taxonomic significance of some genera in the tribe Inuleae from Pakistan. Pak J Bot 39: 1407-1416.
  3. Akçin TA, Akçin A (2014). Achene micromorphology of seven taxa of Achillea L. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Bangl J Plant Taxon 21: 19-25.
  4. Barthlott W (1981). Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord J Bot 1: 345-355.
  5. Bhar I, Mukherjee SK (2004). Macromorphological and micromorphological study of cypselas in seven species of the tribe Anthemideae- (Asteraceae). J Econ Taxon Bot 28: 788- 794. Bona M (2015). Systematic implications of achene characteristics in genera Centaurea L., Cyanus Mill., Psephellus Cass. and Rhaponticoides Vaill. (Asteraceae). Bangl J Plant Taxon 22: 125-136.
  6. Boyko EV (1985). On the systematics of Artemisia aurata and Artemisia palustris (Asteraceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 70: 923-925.
  7. Briquet J (1916). Etudes carpologiques sur les genres de Composées Anthemis, Ormenis et Santolina. Annuaire du Conservatoire et du Jardin Botaniques de Genève 18-19: 257-313.
  8. Candan F, Uysal T, Tugay O, Bozkurt M, Ertuğrul K, Demirelma H (2016). The examinations of achene ultrastructural features of section Acrolophus (Centaurea, Asteraceae) via scanning electron microscopy. Turk J Bot 40: 147-163.
  9. Chehregani A, Mahanfar N (2007). Achene micro-morphology of Anthemis (Asteraceae) and its allies in Iran with emphasis on systematics. Int J Agric Biol 9: 486-488.
  10. Coşkunçelebi K, Makbul S, Okur S (2016). Studies on the achene morphology of Turkish species of Scorzonera L. (Asteraceae) using light and scanning electron microscopy. Phytotaxa 247: 1-26.
  11. Davis PH, Hedge IC (1975). The Flora of Turkey; past, present and future. Candollea 30: 331-351.
  12. Dormer KJ (1962). The taxonomic significance of crystal forms in Centaurea. New Phytol 61: 32-35.
  13. Enayet Hossain ABM (1975). Tripleurospermum Schultz Bip. In: Davis PH, editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 5. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 295- 311. Fahn A, Werker E (1972). Anatomical mechanisms of seed dispersal. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Seed Biology, Vol. I. Importance, Development and Germination. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 151-221.
  14. Funk VA, Susanna A, Stuessy TF, Robinson HE (2009). Cl