Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2019 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6

Regulation of boron toxicity responses via glutathione-dependent detoxification pathways at biochemical and molecular levels in Arabidopsis thaliana

Pages
749–757
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To the best of ourknowledge, this is the first report displaying an integrative view of high-B–induced regulation of GSH-dependent enzymatic machineryat different biological organization levels in Arabidopsis thaliana.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fine-tuned regulation of the Halliwell–Asada cycle (ascorbate–glutathione pathway) in Arabidopsis thaliana underboron (B) toxicity was shown in our previous report.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we investigated the expression levels of some members of theglutathione S-transferase (GST) superfamily, such as phi (GSTF2, GSTF6, GSTF7, and GSTF8), tau (GSTU19), and zeta (GSTZ1) classesin Arabidopsis thaliana that were exposed to 1 mM boric acid (1B) and 3 mM boric acid (3B).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To the best of ourknowledge, this is the first report displaying an integrative view of high-B–induced regulation of GSH-dependent enzymatic machineryat different biological organization levels in Arabidopsis thaliana.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The fine-tuned regulation of the Halliwell–Asada cycle (ascorbate–glutathione pathway) in Arabidopsis thaliana underboron (B) toxicity was shown in our previous report. In this study, we investigated the expression levels of some members of theglutathione S-transferase (GST) superfamily, such as phi (GSTF2, GSTF6, GSTF7, and GSTF8), tau (GSTU19), and zeta (GSTZ1) classesin Arabidopsis thaliana that were exposed to 1 mM boric acid (1B) and 3 mM boric acid (3B). Additionally, the expression levels ofgenes for glutathione (GSH) and phytochelatin biosynthesis as well as miR169 and miR156 were evaluated in Arabidopsis thalianaexposed to 1B and 3B. Moreover, changes in the levels of total GST activity; GSH; and total, protein-bound, and nonprotein thiols werespectrophotometrically determined. GSH levels and nonprotein thiol content did not change significantly following both B-toxicityconditions. Expression levels of GSH1 and GSH2 stayed stable under 1B toxicity; however, GSH1 expression increased significantlyunder 3B conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana. The expression levels of four genes from phi class members of GST were not dramaticallychanged under B-toxicity conditions. However, the transcript levels of miR169, ATGSTU19, and ATGSTZ1 were significantly increasedafter 1B and 3B exposure. These GST genes may have a role in the dramatic increase of total GST activity under toxic B. To the best of ourknowledge, this is the first report displaying an integrative view of high-B–induced regulation of GSH-dependent enzymatic machineryat different biological organization levels in Arabidopsis thaliana.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, Y. Ö., KAYIHAN, D. S., KAYIHAN, C. (2022). Regulation of boron toxicity responses via glutathione-dependent detoxification pathways at biochemical and molecular levels in Arabidopsis thaliana. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 6, 749–757. https://ajindex.com/articles/600905

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anderson ME (1985). Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples. Methods in Enzymology 113: 548-554.
  2. Ardıc M, Sekmen AH, Tokur S, Ozdemir F, Turkan I (2009). Antioxidant response of chickpea plants subjected to boron toxicity. Plant Biology 11: 328-338.
  3. Bradford MM (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254.
  4. Cai Y, Su J, Ma LQ (2004). Low molecular weight thiols in arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata upon exposure to arsenic and other trace elements. Environmental Pollution 129: 69-78.
  5. Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Romero L, Ruiz JM (2007). Oxidative stress and antioxidants in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants subjected to boron toxicity. Annals of Botany 100: 747- 756. Cervilla LM, Blasco B, Rios JJ, Rosales MA, Sanchez-Rodriguez E et al. (2012). Parameters symptomatic for boron toxicity in leaves of tomato plants. Journal of Botany 2012: 1-17.
  6. Chen M, Mishra S, Heckathorn SA, Frantz JM, Krause C (2014). Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves in response to acute boron deficiency and toxicity reveals effects on photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and protein synthesis. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 235-242.
  7. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987). Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry 162: 156-159.
  8. Del longo OT, Gonzalez CA, Pastori GM, Trippi VS (1993). Antioxidant defenses under hyperoxygenic and hyperosmotic conditions in leaves of two lines of maize with differential sensitivity to drought. Plant and Cell Physiology 34: 1023-1028.
  9. Dixon DP, Cummins I, Cole DJ, Edwards R (1998). Glutathionemediated detoxification systems in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 258-266.
  10. Dixon DP, Cole DJ, Edwards R (2000). Characterisation of a zeta class glutathione transferase from Arabidopsis thaliana with a putative role in tyrosine catabolism. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 384: 407-412.
  11. Edwards R, Dixon DP (2005). Plant glutathione transferases. Methods in Enzymology 401: 169-186.
  12. El-Shintinawy F (1999). Structural and functional damage caused by boron deficiency in sunflower leaves. Photosynthetica 36: 565-573. Gallé Á, Csiszár J, Secenji M, Guóth A, Cseuz L et al. (2009). Glutathione transferase activity and expression patterns during grain filling in flag leaves of wheat genotyp