Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

High genetic diversity within and low differentiation among Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. populations: Molecular markers reveal their genetic structure patterns

Pages
192–202
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mantel test results showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between pair-wise geographical and genetic distances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bieb forms about 82% of the total juniper forests in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 456 plant samples belonging to 19 J. excelsa populations were collected to determine the genetic variation of J. excelsa and compare their genetic diversity among populations via simple-sequence repeat (SSR) and intron targeted amplified polymorphism (ITAP) markers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mantel test results showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between pair-wise geographical and genetic distances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

J. excelsa M. Bieb forms about 82% of the total juniper forests in Turkey. A total of 456 plant samples belonging to 19 J. excelsa populations were collected to determine the genetic variation of J. excelsa and compare their genetic diversity among populations via simple-sequence repeat (SSR) and intron targeted amplified polymorphism (ITAP) markers. Seven SSR and 132 ITAP loci were polymorphic. The percentage of polymorphism for ITAP loci at the population level ranged from 31.34 to 55.97. Average values of expected heterozygosity, observed heterozygosity, Shannon’s information index, Fis, Fst and Nm for SSR loci were 0.616, 0.512, 1.54, 0.124, 0.043, and 5.513, respectively. Genetic diversity values of ITAP loci were lower than those of SSR loci. Gst and Nm values for ITAP loci were 0.225 and 1.728, respectively. Pair-wise genetic distances varied between 0.023 and 0.292 for SSR loci, 0.010 and 0.110 for ITAP loci. The majority of the genetic variations originated from intra-population level (98% for SSRs, 80% for ITAPs). Mantel test results showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between pair-wise geographical and genetic distances. It was indicated that the populations had similiar structure pattern. It was seen that J. excelsa populations maintained their high genetic diversity. Additionally, genetic differentiations among the populations were low. No indication of genetic adverse effect related to habitat fragmentation was determined in the populations. In conclusion, it can be said that this situation is an advantage in terms of implementing conservation strategies for this species. The authorities in the Turkish Ministry of Forestry should plan some conservation studies in order to maintain the existing genetic diversity of this species.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVREN, Ö. H., KAYA, N. (2022). High genetic diversity within and low differentiation among Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. populations: Molecular markers reveal their genetic structure patterns. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 192–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/600784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adams RP (2014). Junipers of the World: The Genus Juniperus. 4th ed. Bloomington, Indiana, USA: Trafford Pub. Adams RP, Armağan M, Boratynski A, Douaihy B, Dagher-Kharrat MD et al. (2016). Evidence of relictual introgression or incomplete lineage sorting in nrDNA of Juniperus excelsa and J. polycarpos in Asia Minor. Phytologia 98 (2): 146-155.
  2. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J (2008). Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Molecular Ecology 17: 5177-5188. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x. Bettencourt SX, Medonca D, Lopes MS, Rocha S, Monjardino P et al. (2015). Genetic diversity and population structure of the endemic Azorean juniper, Juniperus brevifolia (Seub.) Antoine, inferred from SSRs and ISSR markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 59: 314-324. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.02.003 Boratyński A, Wachowiak W, Dering M, Boratyńska K, Sękiewicz K et al. (2014). The biogeography and genetic relationships of Juniperus oxycedrus and related taxa from the Mediterranean and Macaronesian regions. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 174: 637-653. doi: 10.1111/boj.12147 Coode MJE, Cullen J (1965) Juniperus L. In: Davis PH (editor) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 1. 1st ed. Edinburg, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press, pp 78-84.
  3. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 1: 19-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02712670 Douaihy B, Vendramin GG, Boratyński A, Machon N, Bou DagherKharrat M (2011). High genetic diversity with moderate differentiation in Juniperus excelsa from Lebanon and the eastern Mediterranean region. AoB Plants plr003: 1-14. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plr003 Earl DA, von Holdt BM (2012). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359-361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
  4. Elibol C, Bilgen BB (2017). Genetic diversity and molecular characterization of natural Pancratium maritimum L. populations by DNA markers. Turkish Journal of Botany 41: 569-578. doi: 10.3906/bot-1702-35
  5. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x Garcia D. 2001. Effects of seed dispersal on Juniperus communis recrui