Journals / Turkish Journal of Botany / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5

Bioassessment of water quality of surface waters using diatom metrics

Pages
379–396
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, biological condition gradient is suggested as an appropriate and effective approach to develop trophic criteria based on the relationships between nutrient concentrations and biological indicators of ecological conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bioassessment of surface waters is one of the most important approaches to predict the deterioration of ecosystems and achieve environmental sustainability according to the application of the European Water Framework Directive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present review emphasizes the importance of the bioassessment of freshwater quality especially running waters based on diatom metrics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, biological condition gradient is suggested as an appropriate and effective approach to develop trophic criteria based on the relationships between nutrient concentrations and biological indicators of ecological conditions.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bioassessment of surface waters is one of the most important approaches to predict the deterioration of ecosystems and achieve environmental sustainability according to the application of the European Water Framework Directive. The present review emphasizes the importance of the bioassessment of freshwater quality especially running waters based on diatom metrics. Nutrient enrichment and hydromorphological alternation driven by human activities are the main factors for the ecological compromise of freshwater ecosystems. Currently, the bioassessment of the ecological condition of inland water bodies is adopted worldwide. Bioassessment is complementary to physicochemical and hydromorphological data for evaluating the ecological conditions of rivers; however, measuring all the physical and chemical changes is expensive and impractical. Therefore, monitoring biota helps to determine the changes occurring in ecosystems. Thus, diatoms are used as bioindicators to assess environmental conditions of the ecosystems, but their use requires great taxonomic knowledge, otherwise, the results will be biased. Many diatom indices have been developed based on the trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in different ecoregions in the last decades. This review highlights the importance and advantages of using diatom metrics in the bioassessment of the ecological status of surface waters in the different ecoregions, especially running water. To analyze the complex response of diatom communities to environmental gradients and assess the quality of the ecosystem, multivariate statistical approaches are needed. The challenge here is how to define criteria for classes of water bodies in a biologically meaningful way. For this reason, biological condition gradient is suggested as an appropriate and effective approach to develop trophic criteria based on the relationships between nutrient concentrations and biological indicators of ecological conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEKLİ, A., YAVUZATMACA, M., LEKESİZ, Ö. (2022). Bioassessment of water quality of surface waters using diatom metrics. Turkish Journal of Botany, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 5, 379–396. https://ajindex.com/articles/600763

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M et al. (2008). Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience 58 (5): 403-414. Ács É, Szabó K, Tóth B, Kiss KT (2004). Investigation of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection with reference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Botanica Hungarica 46 (3-4): 255-278. Álvarez-Blanco I, Blanco S, Cejudo-Figueiras C, Bécares E (2013). The Duero Diatom Index (DDI) for river water quality assessment in NW Spain: design and validation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185 (1): 969-981.
  2. Andersen JH, Conley DJ, Hedal S (2004). Palaeoecology, reference conditions and classification of ecological status: the EU Water Framework Directive in practice. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49 (4): 283-290.
  3. Bae YJ, Kil HK, Bae KS (2005). Benthic macroinvertebrates for uses in stream biomonitoring and restoration. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 9 (1): 55-63.
  4. Baert JM, Janssen CR, Sabbe K, De Laender F (2016). Per capita interactions and stress tolerance drive stress-induced changes in biodiversity effects on ecosystem functions. Nature Communications 7 (1): 1-8.
  5. Ballesteros I, Castillejo P, Haro A, Montes C, Heinrich C et al. (2020). Genetic barcoding of Ecuadorian epilithic diatom species suitable as water quality bioindicators. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 343 (1): 41-52. doi: 10.5802/crbiol.2 Bauernfeind E, Moog O (2000). Mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) and the assessment of ecological integrity: a methodological approach. Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters, Springer, 149: 71-83.
  6. Behrendt H, Opitz D (1996). Güteklassenbezogene Zielvorgaben zur Nährstoffreduzierung im Berliner Gewässersystem. IGBMitteilungen 1: 27-92.
  7. Benito X, Fritz SC, Steinitz-Kannan M, Tapia PM, Kelly MA et al. (2018). Geo-climatic factors drive diatom community distribution in tropical South American freshwaters. Journal of Ecology 106 (4): 1660-1672.
  8. Bere T (2016). Challenges of diatom-based biological monitoring and assessment of streams in developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23 (6): 5477-5486.
  9. Bere T, Tundisi JG (2011). Influence of ionic strength and conductivity on benthic diatom communities in a tropical river (Monjolinho), São Carlos-SP, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 661 (1): 261-276.
  10. Best J (2019). Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers. Nature Geoscience 12 (1)