SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Folklor/Edebiyat / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 102

The Collective Phallic Gaze, the Evil Eye and the Serpent in John Keats’ Lamia and Yashar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent

Fırat KARADAŞ
Pages
347–360
Publication Date
2020-05-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article discusses the historical, religious, and mythological significance of the gaze, its collective function, and its relation to or mythical/historical enmity with the feminine within the framework of Keats’ Lamia and Yaşar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The gaze is not only an act of seeing but also a collective control and oppressive mechanism used for suppressing deviations from the standard social norm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The English Romantic poet John Keats’ Lamia, a narrative poem relating a mythological serpentine woman’s love affair with a young man named Lycius, depicts how the collective gaze operates for her destruction in the patriarchal world of Corinth, the term collective gaze being employed from Durkheim.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article discusses the historical, religious, and mythological significance of the gaze, its collective function, and its relation to or mythical/historical enmity with the feminine within the framework of Keats’ Lamia and Yaşar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:gaze · evil eye

Özet

The gaze is not only an act of seeing but also a collective control and oppressive mechanism used for suppressing deviations from the standard social norm. The evil gaze is the one that should be subjugated by the sacred patriarchal gaze and be pushed outside the reach of social life for the welfare of humanity. In anthropological terms, the most common emblems of the evil gaze are the evil eye and the serpent. The English Romantic poet John Keats’ Lamia, a narrative poem relating a mythological serpentine woman’s love affair with a young man named Lycius, depicts how the collective gaze operates for her destruction in the patriarchal world of Corinth, the term collective gaze being employed from Durkheim. Of particular importance is Apollonius’ gaze, which plays a crucial role in Lamia’s destruction. In Yashar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent the aim of the gaze is crushing the serpent, that is, Esme, and most characters—especially Esme’s mother-in-law—use all the patriarchal strategies in a village setting to persuade Hasan, Esme’s son, to kill her. The article discusses the historical, religious, and mythological significance of the gaze, its collective function, and its relation to or mythical/historical enmity with the feminine within the framework of Keats’ Lamia and Yaşar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAŞ, F. (2020). The Collective Phallic Gaze, the Evil Eye and the Serpent in John Keats’ Lamia and Yashar Kemal’s To Crush the Serpent. Folklor/Edebiyat, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 102, 347–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/59803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Berger, J. (1972).
  2. Ways of seeing. Penguin. Bohigian, G. H. (1997). The history of the evil eye and its influence on ophthalmology, medicine and social customs. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Kluwer Academic. 91-100.
  3. Brotemarkle, D. (1993). Imagination and myths in John Keats’s poetry. Mellen Research University. Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms: Mythical thought. R. Manheim (Trans). Yale University. Gardiner, J. K. (2012). Female masculinity and phallic women. Feminist studies, vol. 38, no. 3. 597- 624. Gilbert, S. and S. Gubar (1996). Infection in the sentence. Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. R. Warhol and D. P. Herndl (Eds). Rutgers University. 289-300.
  4. Gordon, R. (1999). Imagining Greek and Roman magic. Witchcraft and magic in Europe B. Ankarloo and S. Clark (Eds). University of Pennsylvania. 159-266.
  5. Graves, R. (1977).
  6. The Greek myths. Pelican. Keats, J. (2001). Complete poems and selected letters of John Keats. The Modern Library. Kemal, Y. (2007). Yılanı öldürseler. Yapı Kredi. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1987). Introduction to the work of Marcel Mauss. F. Baker. (Trans). Routledge. Luck, G. (1999). Witches and sorcerers in classical literature. Witchcraft and magic in Europe. B. Ankarloo and S. Clark (Eds). University of Pennsylvania. 159-266.
  7. Mauss, M. (2001). A general theory of magic. R. Brain (Trans.). Routledge. Topcu, M. (2008). Yaşar Kemal’in romanlarında halkbilimi unsurları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Tuncer, Y. (1998). Bir Homeros ve Cervantes mirasçısı. Yaşar Kemal’i okumak. Adam. 117-127.
  8. Van Buren, E. D. (1945). Amulets in ancient Mesopotamia. Orientalia nova series, vol. 14. Gregorian Biblical. 18-23.
  9. Yilacioglu, S. (1998). Halk masallarından alınan bazı ögeler üzerine. Yaşar Kemal’ı Okumak. Adam. 128-133.
  10. Electronic resources Antoniou, S.; Antoniou, G. A., Learney, R., Granderath, A., Antoniou, A. I.(2011). The rod and the serpent: history’s ultimate healing symbol, 35 (1), 217-21. World Journal of Surgery, 217-221. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0686-y (Accessed: 28.10.2019)
  11. Girard, R. (1977). Violence and representation in the mythical text. MLN, Vol. 92, No. 5, Compartive Literature. The John Hopkins University. 92 (5), 922-944. http://doi. org/10.2307/2906884. Karakurt, D. (2012). Türk mitolojisi ansiklopedisi: Türk söylence sözlüğü. https://www.academia.edu/11557648/T%C3%BCrk_Mitoloji_Ansiklopedisi_Deniz_Karakurt- (Accessed: 30.10.2019) Woodburn