SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Folklor/Edebiyat / 2026 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 128

A Sociological Study of the Roma (Gitano) Population Living in Granada

Granada’da Yaşayan Roman (Gitanolar) Nüfusu Üzerine Sosyolojik Bir Araştırma

Ani Tarugishvili(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2540-8649
Suat Kolukırık(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0399-666X
Pages
1263–1290
Publication Date
2026-11-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that strong family bonds, respect for elders, and other cultural practices such as endogamy or mourning traditions continue to persist.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explore how Roma (Gitano) identity is constructed and maintained through traditions and how it evolves under social changes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the same time, gender roles evolve, and educational participation increases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that strong family bonds, respect for elders, and other cultural practices such as endogamy or mourning traditions continue to persist.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Roman · Gitano · kimlik

Abstract

This study aims to explore how Roma (Gitano) identity is constructed and maintained through traditions and how it evolves under social changes. By employing an ethnographic approach, the research focuses on the ethnographic characteristics of the Roma (Gitano) community living in Granada, Spain, including common cultural elements, social organization models, and belief systems. Participants were selected using snowball sampling based on predefined inclusion criteria requiring Roma (Gitano) identity, Spanish citizenship, and a minimum of one year of residence in Granada. Data collection continued until saturation was reached, resulting in a final sample consisted of fifteen participants. Upon using content analysis techniques, four central themes emerged: Cultural Characteristics and Traditions, Identity and Cultural Pride, Discrimination and Stereotypes, and Perception of the Future and Expectations. The findings reveal that strong family bonds, respect for elders, and other cultural practices such as endogamy or mourning traditions continue to persist. At the same time, gender roles evolve, and educational participation increases. Participants also reported widespread experiences of discrimination that influence their social interactions and identity expressions. This study concludes that Roma (Gitano) identity is maintained through dynamic cultural practices that balance tradition with adaptation. Research findings underscore the need for increased public awareness to dismantle stereotypes and support the Roma (Gitano) identity. This study makes a considerable contribution to the fields of ethnography and cultural studies through an in-depth analysis of the Roma (Gitano) community residing in Granada.

Özet

GranadaÖzBu çalışma, Roman (Gitano) kimliğinin gelenekler aracılığıyla nasıl inşa edildiğini ve sürdürüldüğünü ve toplumsal dönüşümlerin etkisi altında nasıl evrildiğini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden etnografik yaklaşım kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen bu çalışma, İspanya’nın Granada kentinde yaşayan Roman (Gitano) topluluğunun ortak kültürel unsurları, toplumsal örgütlenme modelleri ve inanç sistemleri gibi etnografik özellikleri üzerine odaklanmıştır. On beş katılımcı, Roman (Gitano) kimliğine ve İspanyol vatandaşlığına sahip olup Granada ’da en az bir yıl ikamet eden bireyler arasından, kartopu örnekleme tekniği kullanılarak veri doygunluğuna ulaşılıncaya kadar seçilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizi tekniği kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, Kültürel Nitelikler ve Gelenekler, Kimlik ve Kültürel Özsaygı, Ayrımcılık ve Önyargılar ile Gelecek Algısı ve Beklentiler olmak üzere dört ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bulgularda, güçlü aile bağlarının, büyüklere saygı göstermenin, iç evlilik (endogami) veya yas tutma gelenekleri gibi farklı kültürel uygulamaların halen varlığını sürdürdüğü; ayrıca cinsiyet rollerinin dönüştüğü ve eğitime katılımın arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, sosyal etkileşimlerde ve kimlik ifadelerinde ayrımcılık deneyimlerinin de yaşandığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, Roman (Gitano) kimliğinin, gelenek ile uyum süreçlerini dengeleyen kültürel uygulamalar aracılığıyla sürdürüldüğü sonucuna ulaşılmış; ayrıca, Romanların (Gitano) desteklenmesi amacıyla kamuoyunun farkındalığının artırılması ve önyargıların giderilmesinin gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Bu araştırma, Granada kentindeki Roman (Gitano) nüfusunu derinlemesine inceleyerek çalışmanın önemini artırmış ve etnografi ile kültürel çalışmalar alanlarına önemli bir katkı sunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tarugishvili, A., Kolukırık, S. (2026). A Sociological Study of the Roma (Gitano) Population Living in Granada. Folklor/Edebiyat, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 128, 1263–1290. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.5016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (113)

  1. Acton, T.A. (1979). Academic success and political failure: A review of modern social science writing in English on Gypsies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2, 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1979.9993265
  2. Arayıcı, A. (2008). Avrupa’nın vatansızları Çingeneler. Kalkedon.
  3. Asseo, H. (2007). Çingeneler: bir Avrupa yazgısı (O. Türkay, Çev.) Yapı Kredi.
  4. Aparicio Gervás, J.M. (2006). Breve recopilación sobre La historia Del Pueblo Gitano: desde Su Salida Del Punjab, Hasta La constitución Española de 1978. Veinte Hitos sobre La Otra historia de España. RIFOP: revista interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado: continuación de La Antigua. Revista De Escuelas Normales, 20(1), 141–162.
  5. Bakker, P. (1995). Notes on the genesis of Caló and other Iberian Para-Romani varieties. Romani Studies, 5(1), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.126.07bak
  6. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity.
  7. Berger, P.L., and Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction. Penguin Books.
  8. Blom, T. (1998). Microperipherality in metropolitan areas. In L. Andersson & T. Blom (Ed.), Sustainability and development (164-175). Karlstad: University of Karlstad.
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1968). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson, & J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the (241-258). Greenwood.
  10. Caballero, J. M. (1988). Luces y sobras del flamenco. Algaida.
  11. Castles, S., De Haas, H. and Miller, M. J (2014). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Cisneros-Kostic, R.E. (2009). Flamenco and its Gitanos: An investigation of the paradox of Andalusia: History, politics, and dance art [Unpublished Master’s thesis] The University of New Mexico.
  13. Cole, M. (2017 ). Critical race theory and education: A Marxist response. Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Corradi, L. (2018). Gypsy feminism: intersectional politics, alliances, gender and queer activism. Routledge.
  15. Cisneros-Kostic, R. (2010). Flamenco and Its Gitanos An Investigation of the Paradox of Andalusia: History, Politics and Dance Art (master’s thesis, The University of New Mexico). The University of New Mexico.
  16. Council of Europe. (2012). Descriptive glossary of terms relating to Roma issues. Council of Europe. https://childrenofprisoners.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Glossary_Roma_18May2012_CoE.pdf
  17. Colocci, A (1889). The Gypsies: History of an errant people. Arnaldo Forni editore.
  18. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (1), S95-S120.
  19. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
  20. Creswell, J.W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
  21. Crocker, J., Major, B., and Steele, C. (1998). The social psychology of stigma. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey, (Eds.), In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 504-553.
  22. Crowe, D. M. (1994). A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia. St. Martin’s Press.
  23. Cuellar-Moreno, M. (2016). Flamenco dance. characteristics, resources, and reflections on its evolution. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2016.1260825
  24. Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln, (Eds.), SAGE.
  25. Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
  26. Demeter, N., Bessonov, N., and Kutenkov, V. (2000). History of Gypsies – a new view. Voronezh Publishing and Printing Company.
  27. Durkheim, E. (2008). The elementary forms of religious life. C. Cosman (Trans.), Oxford University.
  28. Durkheim, E. (1960). The division of labour in society. G. Simpson (Trans.), The Free Press of Glencoe.
  29. Edden, N., Hughes, K.A., McCormack, E., & Prendergast, C. (2011). A study investigating the cultural traditions and customs of the Romani community in Gorton, Manchester (Coursework for LELA30191 Romani Linguistics). ROMANI Project, The University of Manchester. https://www.kratylos.org/~raphael/romani/downloads/2/traditions.pdf
  30. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2020). Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey—Roma— Selected Findings. Publications Office of the European Union.
  31. Fraser, A.M. (1992). The gypsies. Blackwell.
  32. Fellman, P. V., and Renard, S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of the Romany diaspora. (1-23) Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242714788.
  33. Fırat, M. (2022). Geçmişten günümüze Çingene göçleri: Sosyo-tarihsel bir bakış. İçtimaiyat, 6(Göç ve Mültecilik Özel Sayısı), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1111454
  34. Fleischmann, F., & Op De Weegh, A. (2022). Majority acceptance vs. rejection of ‘being both’ facilitates immigrants’ bicultural identity blendedness and positive affect. Self and Identity, 21, 506-526 Fundación Secretariado Gitano (FSG). (2010). Annual report. Madrid: Fundación Secretariado Gitano. https://www.gitanos.org/publicaciones/memoria09Andalucia/informeAndalucia/ComGitAndaluza.pdf
  35. Fundación Secretariado Gitano (FSG). (2023). Discrimination and the Roma community - Annual report. Fundación Secretariado Gitano.
  36. Fundación Secretariado Gitano (FSG). (2015). Discrimination and the Roma Community - Annual report. Fundación Secretariado Gitano.
  37. Gamella, J.F. (2020). Consanguineous marriages among Andalusian Gitanos/Cale: A genealogical analysis (1925-2006). Journal of Biosocial Science, 52(6), 809-831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932019000804
  38. Gamella, J.F., and Alvarez-Roldan, A. (2023). Breaking secular endogamy. The growth of intermarriage among the Gitanos/Cale of Spain (1900–2006). The History of the Family, 31(3), 533-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2159852
  39. Gamella, J.F., and Nunez-Negrillo, A.M. (2019). The evolution of consanguineous marriages in the Archdiocese of Granada, Spain (1900-1979). Human Biology, 90(2), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.90.2.02
  40. Gamella, J. F., Fernández, C., Nieto, M., and Adiego, I.X. (2011). The agony of a language: What remains of the Caló dialect in the language of the Gypsies. Part I: Methods, sources and general results. Gazeta de Antropología, 27(2), Article 39. Gamella, J. F., Adiego, I.X., & Fernández Ortega, C. (2016). A Caló lexicon with data about its knowledge by a group of Spanish Gitanos or Calé. In I. Buzek (Ed.), Interacciones entre el caló y el español: Historia, relaciones y fuentes. 113-135 Gamella, J.F. (2000). Mujeres Gitanas. Matrimonio y género en la cultura gitana de Andalucía. Consejería de Asuntos Sociales, Secretaría para la Comunidad Gitana.
  41. Gamella, J. F. (2020). Consanguineous marriages among Andalusian Gitanos/Calé: a genealogical analysis (1925–2006). Journal of Biosocial Science, 52(6), 809-831. doi:10.1017/S0021932019000804
  42. Garcia, M.E. (2009). ‘Pachucos, Chicano homeboys and Gypsy Caló: Transmission of a speech style’, Ethnic Studies Review, 32(2), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.1525/esr.2009.32.2.24
  43. Gheorghe, N., Maghiar, A.G., and Szabo, A. (2016). The Roma People in the European Union: Historical, Cultural and Institutional Aspects. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  44. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
  45. Goffman, E. (2014). Damga: Örselenmiş kimliğin idare edilişi üzerine notlar (Ş. Geniş-L, N. Ünsaldı-S, and N. Ağırnasıl, Çev.) Heretik.
  46. Gomez-Alfaro, A. (1999). Tipologías, matrimonios mixtos y mestizajes gitanos en los censos históricos andaluces. Demófilo, 30, 30-52.
  47. Gupta, A. (2024). Qualitative methods and data analysis using ATLAS.ti - A comprehensive researcher’s manual. Springer.
  48. Grierson, G.A. (1888). Doms, Jats, and the origin of the Gypsies. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, 1(2), 71-76.
  49. Hancock, I.F. (200.). The Concocters: Creating Fake Romani Culture. In The Role of the Romanies: Images and Self-Images of Gypsies/Romanies in European Cultures. Liverpool.
  50. Hancock, I.F. (2006). We are the Romani people. University of Hertfordshire Press.
  51. Heelas, P. (1996): Detraditionalization and its Rivals. In Heelas,P., Morrus, S., and Lash-Paul (Eds.) Detraditionalization. Wiley-Blackwell.
  52. Ivanova, A. (1970). The Dance in Spain. Praeger Publisher.
  53. Kalaydjieva, L., Gresham, D. & Calafell, F. (2001). Genetic studies of Roma (Gypsies): a review. BMC Med Genet, 2 (5).
  54. Kolukırık, S. (2005). Türk toplumunda çingene imgesi ve önyargısı, Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(8), 52-71.
  55. Kenrick, D. (2007). Historical dictionary of the Gypsies (Romanies) Scarecrow Press.
  56. Kende, A., Sam Nariman, H., Ayanian, A. H., Halabi, S., Ivan, C., Karić, T., Mihić, V., Nyúl, B., Pántya, J., da Silva, C., & Hopkins, N. (2024). ‘We’re still here’: Misrecognition and the quest for dual identification of Roma people. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34, e2793.
  57. Lagunas, D. (2005). Los tres cromosomas: modernidad, identidad y parentesco entre los gitanos catalanes. Editorial Comares.
  58. La Parra-Casado, D., Mosquera, P. A., Vives-Cases, C., & San Sebastian, M. (2018). Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Use of Healthcare Services: Comparison between the Roma and General Populations in Spain. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(1), 121.
  59. Lewy, G. (1999). The travail of the Gypsies. The National Interest, (57), 78-86.
  60. Lewin, K. (1972). A mezõelmélet a társadalomtudományokban. Gondolat Könyvkiadó.
  61. Leblon, B. (2004). Gypsies and Flamenco. University of Hertfordshire Press.
  62. Liegeois, J.P. (1994). Roma, Gypsies, travellers. Council of Europe publishing.
  63. López Catalán, O. and Aharchi, N. (2012). Discursos sobre la inmigración rrom (gitana) rumana en Barcelona, Discurso & Sociedad, 6(2), 543-590.
  64. Madrid-Fernandez, D., and Katz, S.S. (2018). Do Gitano students feel discriminated against in their social and academic surroundings? A survey of schools in Granada, Spain. Intercultural Education, 29(3), 363-378.https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2018.1435408
  65. Mahretu, A., Pigozzi, B.W., and Sommers, L.M. (2000). Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography, 82(2), 89-101.
  66. Martin, E., and Gamella, J. F. (2005). Marriage practices and ethnic differentiation: The case of Spanish Gypsies (1870-2000). The History of the Family, 10(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2004.03.004
  67. Martínez-Cruz, B., Mendizabal, I., Harmant, C., de Pablo, R., Ioana, M., Angelicheva, D., Kouvatsi,
  68. A., Makukh, H., Netea, M. G., Pamjav, H., Zalán, A., Tournev, I., Marushiakova, E., Popov, V., Bertranpetit, J., Kalaydjieva, L., Quintana-Murci, L., & Comas, D. (2016). Origins, admixture and founder lineages in European Roma. European journal of human genetics: EJHG, 24(6), 937–943.
  69. Marusiakova, E., and Popov, V. (2004). Segmentation vs. Consolidation: The Example of Four Gypsy Groups in CIS. Romani Studies, 14(2):145-191.
  70. Marusiakova, E., and Popov, V. (2021). Roma voices in history: A sourcebook: Roma civic emancipation in Central, South-Eastern and Eastern Europe from the 19th century until World War II. E. Marusiakova, and V. Popov, (Eds.), Ferdinand Schöningh.
  71. Marusiakova, E., and Popov, V. (2018). Roma Labeling: Policy and academica. Slovensky Narodpis, 66(4):385-418.
  72. Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy. B. Fowkes, (Trans.), Penguin Classics.
  73. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
  74. Matras, Y. (2002). Romani a linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
  75. Mateas, Y. (2008). Notes on Romani Culture. University of Manchester.
  76. McLane, M. (1977). The Calo of Guadix: A surviving Romani lexicon. Anthropological Linguistics, 19(7), 303-319.
  77. McLane, M.F. (1985). Romani speech domains in Spain and Portugal. In J. Grumet, Papers from the 4th and 5th Annual Meeting of the Gypsy Lore Society, North American Chapter (188-198) Gypsy Lore Society, North American Chapter.
  78. Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago.
  79. Miles, M.B., and Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE.
  80. Mirga, A., and Mroz, L. (1994). Cyganies: Odmiennosc i nietolerancja. PWN
  81. Motomura, A. (2005). Review of the village and the outside world in Golden Age Castile: Mobility and migration in everyday rural l ife.Cambridge University.
  82. Moon, C. (2015). The alert collector: Dance and flamenco, a guide to sources. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54, 19–22.
  83. Nguyen, A. M. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 122-159.
  84. Parsons, T. (2013). The social system. B. S. Turner (Ed.), Routledge.
  85. Phinney, J.S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499-514.
  86. Parno, I.M. and Vasiluță-Ștefănescu, M. (2021). Roma people, where to? Tradition and change in Roma communities. Eurolimes, 14(23).
  87. Quintana, B.B., and Floyd, L.G. (1972). ¡Qué gitano!: Gypsies of southern Spain. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  88. Radovanovic, S., & Knezevic, A. (2014). Romi u Srbiji (Roma people in Serbi a)Republicki zavod za statistiku.
  89. Ropero, M. (1995). El término Flamenco. Historia del Flamenco [The Flamenco Term ] Tartesos.
  90. Ruiz, A. (2007). Vibrant Andalusia: The spice of life in Southern Spain. Algora.
  91. Rummens, J. A. (2000). Canadian Identities: An Interdisciplinary Overview of Canadian Research on Identity. Canadian Heritage.
  92. Ringold, D., Orenstein, M.A., and Wilkens E. (2005). Roma in an Expanding Europe: Breaking the Poverty Cycle. World Bank Publications.
  93. Scheffler, H.W. (2001). Filiation and affiliation. Routledge.
  94. Stark, R., and Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. University o fCalifornia Press.
  95. Stewart, M. (1997). The Time of the Gypsies. Westview.
  96. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University.
  97. Tarnovschi, D., Preoteasa, A. M., Vlase, I., Pamporov, A., Kabakchieva, P., Palvarini, P., & Fundación Secretariado Gitano (2012). Roma from Romania, Bulgaria, Italy and Spain between social inclusion and migration. Soros Foundation Romania.
  98. Talewicz-Kwiatkowska, J. (2014). One culture or multiple cultures? The diversity of Roma people in Poland. Colloquia Humanistica, 3, 77-89.
  99. Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society [Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft] Michigan State University.
  100. Totton, R. (2003). Song of the O utcasts.Amadeus Press.
  101. Trudeau, D., and McMorran, C. (2011). The geographies of marginalization. In V. J. Del Casino, M. P. Steinberg, and A. Mazzocco, A companion to social and cultural geography (437-453) Blackwell.
  102. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds.), Harvard University.
  103. Weber, M. (2001). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism.T. Parsons (Trans.), Routledge.
  104. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. An outline of interpretative sociology. F. Kolegar (Trans.), University of California Press.
  105. Williams, P. (1994). The European odyssey of The Gypsies on the road. Unesco Courier, 47(11).
  106. Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin.
  107. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. SAGE.
  108. Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant–majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171-188.
  109. Черных, А. В. (2003). Пермские Цыгане. Очерки Этнографии Цыганского Табора. Изд-во ПОНИЦА, 5-14. [Chernykh A.V. (2003). Perm Gypsies: Essays on ethnography of a Gypsy camping-ground. PONITSA Publishing House, 5-14].
  110. Fleischmann, F., & Op De Weegh, A. (2022). Majority acceptance vs. rejection of ‘being both’ facilitates immigrants’ bicultural identity blendedness and positive affect. Self and Identity, 21, 506-526 Fundación Secretariado Gitano (FSG). (2010). Annual report. Madrid: Fundación Secretariado Gitano. https://www.gitanos.org/publicaciones/memoria09Andalucia/informeAndalucia/ComGitAndaluza.pdf
  111. Heelas, P. (1996): Detraditionalization and its Rivals. In Heelas,P., Morrus, S., and Lash-Paul (Eds.) Detraditionalization. Wiley-Blackwell.
  112. Lagunas, D. (2005). Los tres cromosomas: modernidad, identidad y parentesco entre los gitanos catalanes. Editorial Comares.
  113. Черных, А. В. (2003). Пермские Цыгане. Очерки Этнографии Цыганского Табора. Изд-во ПОНИЦА, 5-14. [Chernykh A.V. (2003). Perm Gypsies: Essays on ethnography of a Gypsy camping-ground. PONITSA Publishing House, 5-14].