SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

THE COLD WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1950s: WHAT WAS THE SOVIET RESPONSE AGAINST WESTERN INTERVENTIONISM?

1950'lerin İkinci Yarısında Orta Doğu'da Soğuk Savaş: Batı Müdahaleciliğine Karşı Sovyetler Ne Tepki Gösterdi?

Umut BEKCAN
Pages
49–72
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, this policy of the Soviet Union against the interventionistpolicies of the western capitalist states in the Middle East defending the independence andsovereignty of states in the region constitutes the main research problem of this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to look from the Soviet Union’s perspective to the attempts of western capitaliststates intending to maintain their domains in the period, in which the Suez Crisis and theEisenhower doctrine dominated the region; to reveal how the Soviet Union assessed thedevelopments and to clarify its position.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Soviet Union responded to the West with an antiimperialist policy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, this policy of the Soviet Union against the interventionistpolicies of the western capitalist states in the Middle East defending the independence andsovereignty of states in the region constitutes the main research problem of this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to look from the Soviet Union’s perspective to the attempts of western capitaliststates intending to maintain their domains in the period, in which the Suez Crisis and theEisenhower doctrine dominated the region; to reveal how the Soviet Union assessed thedevelopments and to clarify its position. The Soviet Union responded to the West with an antiimperialist policy. In this context, this policy of the Soviet Union against the interventionistpolicies of the western capitalist states in the Middle East defending the independence andsovereignty of states in the region constitutes the main research problem of this study.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Süveyş Krizi ve Eisenhower doktriniyle batılı kapitalist devletlerin bölgede nüfuz/etkinlik alanı sağlama amaçlı girişimlerine Sovyetler Birliği’nin penceresinden bakmak, pozisyonunu ve gelişmeleri nasıl değerlendirdiğini ortaya koymak amaçlandı. Sovyetler Birliği Batı’ya antiemperyalist politikayla karşılık verdi. Bu bağlamda, Orta Doğu’da Batılı kapitalist devletlerin müdahaleci politikalarına karşı Sovyetler Birliği’nin bölge devletlerinin bağımsızlık ve egemenliğini savunarak antiemperyalist bir politika gütmesi bu çalışmanın temel sorunsalını oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEKCAN, U. (2022). THE COLD WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1950s: WHAT WAS THE SOVIET RESPONSE AGAINST WESTERN INTERVENTIONISM?. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 49–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/595996

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. “Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples”, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/ 1514(XV) (accessed on 12 November 2018).
  2. Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 1 1971
  3. Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 1, A-İ, red. A.Gromyko, I.Zemskov, V.Khvostov, Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 2 1971
  4. Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 2, K-P red. A. Gromyko, I. Zemskov, V. Khvostov, Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 3 1973
  5. Diplomaticheskiy Slovar, Tom 3, R-Ya red. A.Gromyko, I.Zemskov, V.Khvostov, Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva “Editorial Note”, Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1955-1957, Volume XIV 1989 Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS), 1955-1957, Arab-Israeli Dispute, 1955, Volume XIV, ed. Carl N. Raether, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 576-577. “Editorial Note”, FRUS, 1958-1960, Volume XI 1992 FRUS, 1958-1960,
  6. Lebanon and Jordan, Volume XI, ed. Louis J. Smith, United States Government Printing Office, Washington. pp. 338-339. “Editorial Note”, FRUS, 1958-1960, Volume XI 1992 FRUS, 1958-1960,
  7. Lebanon and Jordan, Volume XI, ed. Louis J. Smith, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, p. 372. “Egipetskiy.” 1956“Egipetskiy Narod Vysoko Tsenim Podderzhku, Kotoryyu Okazal Emu Sovetskiy Narod” Pravda, 28 December 1956. Gromyko 1988
  8. Gromyko, Andrei. Pamyatnoe Kn. 1, Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva Istoriya Diplomatii 1974
  9. Istoriya Diplomatii, Tom V, Kniga Pervaya, red. V.Semenov & M.Kharlamov, Izdatelstvo Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva Lenin 1969a Vladimir Lenin, “Imperializm, Kak Vysshaya Stadiya Kapitalizma”, Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy, Tom 27, Izdatelskoy Politicheskoy Literatury, Moskva, pp. 299-426. Lenin 1969b Vladimir Lenin, “Sotsialisticheskaya Revolyutsiya i Pravo Natsii na Samoopredelenie”, Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy, Tom 27, Moskva, Izdatelskoy Politicheskoy Literatury, 1969, pp. 252- 266. “Letter From President Eisenhower to Prime Minister Eden”, FRUS, 1955-1957, Volume XVI 1990 FRUS, 1955-1957,
  10. Suez Crisis, July 26- December 31, 1956, Volume XVI, ed. Nina J. Noring, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 69-70. “Letter From the British Ambassador (Makins) to the Secretary of State”, FRUS, 1955- 1957, Volume XVI 1990 FRUS, 1955-1957,
  11. Suez Crisis, July 26-December 31, 1956, Volume XVI, ed. Nina J. Noring, United States Government Pri