SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 39

The Signiificance of İstanbul Conference (1876)in Otoman-British Relations

Osmanlı-İngiliz İlişkilerinde İstanbul Konferansı (1876)'nın Yeri

Mithat AYDIN
Pages
101–115
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this frame, it explicates the dilemma in Great Britain's traditional Eastern policy which was caused by Pro-Russian and anti-Turkish stance held by Lord Salisbury who jointly worked with Russian representative Ignatiew.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study reveals the significance of İstanbul Conference, which was held to reconcile Great Powers' interests, for Great Britain's Eastern policy and for its effect'on Ottoman-British relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study reveals the significance of İstanbul Conference, which was held to reconcile Great Powers' interests, for Great Britain's Eastern policy and for its effect'on Ottoman-British relations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this frame, it explicates the dilemma in Great Britain's traditional Eastern policy which was caused by Pro-Russian and anti-Turkish stance held by Lord Salisbury who jointly worked with Russian representative Ignatiew.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study reveals the significance of İstanbul Conference, which was held to reconcile Great Powers' interests, for Great Britain's Eastern policy and for its effect'on Ottoman-British relations. In this frame, it explicates the dilemma in Great Britain's traditional Eastern policy which was caused by Pro-Russian and anti-Turkish stance held by Lord Salisbury who jointly worked with Russian representative Ignatiew.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Büyük Devletlerin çıkarlarını uzlaştırmak için topladıkları İstanbul konferansının, İngiltere'nin "Doğu" politikasındaki yerini ve Osmanh-İngiliz ilişkilerine etkisini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çerçevede konferans süresince Rus temsilci Ignatiew ile "uyum içinde " çalışan Lord Salisbury 'nin takip ettiği Rus yanlısı ve anti-Türk politikanın İngiltere 'nin geleneksel Doğu politikasında meydana getirdiği ikilem izah edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, M. (2022). The Signiificance of İstanbul Conference (1876)in Otoman-British Relations. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 39, 101–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/595875

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Ahmed Saip, Abdülhamid'in Evâil-i Saltanatı, Sadeleştiren: Ruhi Turfan, Kahire, 1326. British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print, The Near and Middle East, The Ottoman Empire: Diplomacy of the Powers, 1876-1878, General Ed. Kenneth Bourne and Cameron Watt, Ed. David Gillard, Parti, Series B, vol. 3, 1984.
  2. BUCKLE, George Earl, The Life of Benjamin Disraeli, vol. VI, 1876-1881,
  3. The Macmillan Company, New York,1920.
  4. CECIL, Lady Gwendolen, Life of Robert Marquis of Salisbury, 1868-1880, vol.11, London, 1923.
  5. DAWSON, Harbutt, "Forward Policy and Reaction 1874-1885", The Cambridge History of British Foreign Policy, 1783-1919,
  6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1923, s.72-148.
  7. DEVEREUX, Robert, The First Ottoman Constitutional Period, A Study of the Constitution and Parlamend, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltomore, 1963.
  8. Engelhardt, Tanzimat ve Türkiye (çev: Ali Reşad), Kaknüs Yayınları, İstanbul, 1999(1. Baskı).Şahsiyeti ve Politikası, Kıskacında Abdülhamit, İletişim ISEMINGER, Gordon Lieweliyn, Britain's Eastern Policy and the Ottoman Christians 1856-1877,
  9. Norman, Oklahoma, 1965.
  10. KOCABAŞ, Süleyman, Sultan II. Abdülhamit-Şahsiyeti ve Politikası, Vatan Yayınları No: 14, İstanbul, 1995.
  11. KOLOĞLU, Orhan, Avrupa 'nınKıskacında Abdülhamit, İletişim Yayınları:478, İstanbul, 1998.
  12. Mahmud Celaleddin Paşa, Mir'ât-ı Hakikat-Tarihî Hakîkatların Aynası (haz.İsmet Miroğlu), c.I-II-III, İstanbul, 1983.
  13. MILLMAN, Richard, Britain and the Eastern Question 1875-1878,
  14. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979.
  15. MORLEY, John, The Life of Gladstone, vol.11, New York, 1903.
  16. ÖZCAN, Azmi, Pan-İslamizm-Osmanlı Devleti Hindistan Müslümanları ve İngiltere (1877-1924), Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları: 41, Ankara, 1997(2.Baskı). SHANNON, Richard, The Crisis of Imperialism 1865-1915, Great Britain, [1976].
  17. Sir Henry Elliot, Some Revolutions and Other Diplomatic Experiences, London, 1922.
  18. STAVRIANOS, L.S., The Balkans Since 1453, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto, London, 1965.
  19. STOJANOVIC, Mihailo D., The Great Powers and The Balkans 1875-1878,
  20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1939.
  21. SUMNER, B.H, Russia and the Balkans 1870-1880,
  22. Archon Books, Hamden, London, 1962.
  23. ŞİMŞİR, Bilal N., Rumeli'den Türk Göçleri, c.II, Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları,Ankara, 1989.
  24. WIRTHWEIN, Walter G., Britain and the Balkan Crisis, 1875-1878,
  25. Columbia University Press, London, 1935.