SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Extrem Sporlara İlişkin Risk ve Çekicilik Algıları

Perception of Risk and Attractiveness of Extreme Sports Among Turkish University Students

Murat KANGALGİL
Gıyasettin DEMİRHAN
Osman SARAÇBAŞI
F. Hülya AŞÇI
Pages
11–22
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MANOVA analysis revaled significantdifferences in perceived risk and attractiveness ofextreme sports in terms of gender and participationin extreme sports (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the per- ceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sportswith regard to gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The studygroup included 1479 female and 1259 male univer- sity students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MANOVA analysis revaled significantdifferences in perceived risk and attractiveness ofextreme sports in terms of gender and participationin extreme sports (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the per- ceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sportswith regard to gender. The secondary aim of thisstudy was to test the differences in perceived risk andattractiveness of extreme sports between studentswith experience in these sports and those without ex- perience. Extreme Sport Risk Perception and Attrac- tiveness Scale , developed by the researchers, wasused to assess university students perception of therisk and attractiveness of extreme sports. The studygroup included 1479 female and 1259 male univer- sity students. MANOVA analysis revaled significantdifferences in perceived risk and attractiveness ofextreme sports in terms of gender and participationin extreme sports (p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, extrem sporlarında algılanançekicilik ve riskin cinsiyete göre incelenmesidir.Çalışmanın ikincil amacı ise, extrem sporları ile uğraşan ve uğraşmayan öğrencilerin extrem sporlarındaalgıladıkları çekicilik ve risk düzeyleri arasında farkolup olmadığının test edilmesidir. Üniversite öğrencilerinin extrem sporlarına ilişkin çekicilik ve risk algılarını değerlendirmek için araştırmacılar tarafındangeliştirilen, Extrem Sporları Risk Algısı ve ÇekicilikÖlçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu 1479 bayan 1259erkek üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. MA- NOVA analizleri, extrem sporlarına katılım durumuve cinsiyete göre, extrem sporlarına ilişkin algılanançekicilik ve algılanan riskin farklılaştığını ortaya koymuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KANGALGİL, M., DEMİRHAN, G., SARAÇBAŞI, O., AŞÇI, F. H. (2022). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Extrem Sporlara İlişkin Risk ve Çekicilik Algıları. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 11–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/593079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alexander CS, Kim YJ, Ensminger M, Johnson KE, Smith BJ, Dolan LJ. (1990). A measure of risk taking for young adolescents: Reliability and validity assessments. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 559-569
  2. Aşçı FH, Demirhan G, Dinç SC. (2007). Psychological profile of Turkish rock climbers: An examination of climbing experience and route difficulty. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 892-900
  3. Boulware DR, Forgey WW, Martin WJ. (2003). Medical risks of wilderness hiking. The American Journal of Medicine, 114, 288-293
  4. Breivik G. (1996). Personality, sensation seeking and risk taking among Everest climbers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 308–320
  5. Brown TJ. (1998). Risk management: Research needs and status report. Journal of Experiential Education, 21, 71–85
  6. Chauvin B, Hermand D, Mullet E. (2007). Risk perception and personality facets. Risk Analysis, 27, 171–185
  7. Coakley JJ. (2001). Sports in Society: Issues And Controversies. (7th ed.) Boston, McGraw– Hill Higher Education
  8. Codern N, Pla M, Ormijan AS, González FJ, Pujol E, Soler M, et al. (2010). Risk perception among smokers: A qualitative study. Risk Analysis, 30, 1563-1571
  9. Cooper D. (2003). Psychology, risk and safety. Professional Safety, 48, 39-46
  10. Cordes KA, Ibrahim M. (1999). Applications in Recreation And Leisure For Today And Future (2nd ed). Boston, MA: WCB/McGraw–Hill
  11. Crane N. (1989). Action Sports. Sparkford: The Oxford Illustrated Press
  12. Davis-Berman J, Berman D. (2002). Risk and Anxiety in Adventure Programming. Journal of Experiential Education, 25, 305-310
  13. Demirhan G. (2003). Dağ sporlarına ilişkin riskin algılanması. (Perception of risk relating to mountain sports) Journal of Physical Education and Sports Training, 8, 3-10
  14. Demirhan G. (2005). Mountaineers’ risk perception in outdoor-adventure sports: a study of sex and sports experience. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 1155-1160
  15. Dinç C, Koca C, Demirhan G, Aşçı H. (2004) The 10th ICHPER-SD Europe Congress & The TSSA 8th International Sports Science Congress, An investigation of risk perception and risk views of male and female university students before and after participating the outdoor activities experience. (Abstract Book), 43-44
  16. Dickson T, Dolnicar S. (2004). 13th International research conference of the Council of Australian University tourism and hospitality education. No risk, no fun: The role of perceived risk in adventure tourism. Available at: http