SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44

-

Beden Eğitimi Derslerinde Kullanılan Farklı Tür Dönütlerin Erişi ve Kalıcılığa Etkisi

Murat Kangalgil
Giyasettin Demirhan
Pages
189–197
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, different feedback types were effective on physical education lessons, verbal+visual groups was the most effective way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was investigated in this study that the effects of different feedback types on success and retention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In 20072008 academic years, 80 eighth grade students participated to study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, different feedback types were effective on physical education lessons, verbal+visual groups was the most effective way.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:beden eğitimi · dönüt · erişi

Abstract

It was investigated in this study that the effects of different feedback types on success and retention. In 20072008 academic years, 80 eighth grade students participated to study. Participants assigned to 4 groups (verbal, visual, verbal+visual, control). Subjects were asked to perform lay-up and jumping shot at the basketball lesson. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U Test were used. According to cognitive domain, there were no significant differences between verbal and control; visual and control group and differences between the other groups were significant (p<0.05). According to jump shoot success; there were no significant differences between visual and control; visual and verbal group, differences between the other groups were significant (p<0.05). According to lay-up success; there were no significant differences between visual and control, differences between the all other groups were significant (p<0.05). According to jump shoot retention; there were no significant differences between verbal and visual, differences between the all other groups were significant (p<0.05). According to lay-up retention; differences between the all groups were significant (p<0.05). As a result, different feedback types were effective on physical education lessons, verbal+visual groups was the most effective way.

Özet

Beden eğitimi derslerinde kullanılan farklı dönütlerin başarı ve kalıcılığa etkisi araştırılmıştır. Araştırma, 2007-2008 öğretim yılında 8. sınıfta 4 grupta (sözel, görsel, sözel+görsel, kontrol) 80 öğrenci ile basketbolda turnike ve sıçrayarak şut konularında yapılmıştır. Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann Whitney-U Testleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgularda; bilişsel alanda, sözel ve kontrol, görsel ve kontrol grupları arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmazken diğer gruplar arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Devinişsel alan sıçrayarak şut erişi puanlarında, görsel ve kontrol, sözel ve görsel gruplar arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmazken diğer gruplar arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Turnike erişi puanlarında görsel ve kontrol grubu arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmazken diğer gruplar arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Sıçrayarak şut kalıcılık puanlarında, sözel ve görsel gruplar arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmazken diğer gruplar arasındaki farklar anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Turnike kalıcılık puanlarında tüm gruplar arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Sonuçta, beden eğitimi derslerinde kullanılan farklı dönütlerin başarıya etkisinin olduğu, en fazla etkinin sözel+görsel dönüt grubunda olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kangalgil, M., Demirhan, G. (2013). -. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44, 189–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/1404750

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Barzouka, K., Bergeles, N. & Hatziharistos, D. (2007) Effect of Simultaneous Model Observation and Self-Modeling of Voleyball Skills Acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 104. 32–42
  2. Beashel, P.& Sibson, A. (2000). ICT-Help of Hindrance. The British Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 31(2), 6–8. Boyce, A. B., Jenkins, D. W., Loftus, J. R., Jason, R. & Markos, N. J. (1996) How Should Feedback Be Delivered? The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Vol: 67 (1): 18–22.
  3. Darden, G. F. (1997). Demonstrating Motor Skills-Rethinking The Expert Demonstration. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68(6): P. 31–35.
  4. Darden, G. & Shimon, J. (2000). Revisit an "Old" Technology: Videotape Feedback for Motor Skill Learning and Performance. Strategies, 13(3), 17–21.
  5. Delgado, A. R. & Prieto, G. (2003). The Effect of Item Feedback on Multiple-Choice Test Responses. British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 94, pp. 73-85.
  6. Edward, P. H. & Dennis, L. (1994) Effect of a Learning Model and Augmented Feedback on Tenis Skill Acquisition. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport Vol. 65 (3) 250–257
  7. Guadognoli, N., Holcomb W. & Davis B. (2002) The Efficacy of Video Feedback for Learning The Golf Swing. Journal of Sport Sciences. 20 (8) 615–622
  8. Hand, J. & Sidaway, B. (1992). Relative Frequency of Modeling Effects on the Performance and Retention of a Motor Skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63 (1-Supplement), 57.
  9. Hebert, P. H. & Landin, D. (1994) Effects of a Learning Model and Augmented Feedback on Tenis Skill Acquisition. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport. Vol:65, No. 3, 250–257
  10. Hebert, E. & Landin, D. (1997). Videotape Feedback in Skill Acquisition. Paper Presented at Southern District AHPERD conference, New Orleans, LA, February.
  11. Ignico, A. (1997). The Effects of Interactive Videotape Instruction on Knowledge, Performance and Assesment or Sport Skills. Physical Educator. Vol. 50 58–63
  12. Jambor, E. A. & Weekes, E. M. (1995). Videotape Feedback: Make it More Effective. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Vol. 66 No. 2 pp. 48–50.
  13. Jambor, E. A. (1996). Beyond Language Barriers: Teaching Techniques for Swimming. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 34–36.
  14. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K. & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing Performance Effectiveness Through Videotape Replay and a Selfcontrolled Learning Environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Vol. 68, Pp. 269–279.
  15. Kluka, D. A. (1999) Motor Behavior: From Learning to Performance. United States: Morton Publishing Co. 197–203
  16. Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P. & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive Effort and Motor Learning. Quest, 46, 328–344.
  17. McCullagh, P. & Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and Learning Models and the Use of Model Knowledge of Results in the Acquisition and Retention of a Motor Skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107–1 16.
  18. McCullagh, P. & Meyer, K. N. (1997). Learning Versus Correct Models: Influence of Model Type on the Learning of a Free-Weight Squat Lift. Research Quarterly for Excercise and Sport. Vol. 68, No.1 pp. 56–61.
  19. Merian, T. & Baumberger, B. (2007) Le Feedback Vidéo en Éducation Physique Scolaire. Staps: Revue Internationale Des Sciences Du Sport Et De L'education Physique. No: 76, 107–120
  20. Mohnsen, B. S. & Thompson, C. (1997). Video Technology in Physical Education. Strategies, 10 (6), 8–11.
  21. Moston, M. & Ashworth,S. (2002) Teaching Physical Education (5 th ed.) San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings Publish
  22. Rothstein, A. L. (1981). Using Feedback to Enhance Learning and Performance With Emphasis on Videotape Replay. Sports Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, 1, 1–7
  23. Schmidt, R. A. & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (3 th ed.). Champaign, Human Kinetics. 332–333
  24. Schmidt, R. A. & Wrisberg, C. A. (2004) Motor Learning and Performance (3 rd ed). Champaign IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
  25. Siedentop, D. (1991). Generic Instructional Strategies. James Bull (Ed), Developing Teaching Skills in Physical Education. (205–223), Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
  26. Sidaway, B. & Hand, J. (1993). Frequency of Modeling Effects on the Acquisition and Retention of a Motor Skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64 (1), 122–126.
  27. Taylor, S. L. (2006). A Study of The Effectiveness of Modern Digital Imaging Techniques with Middle School Physical Education Students During the Development and Acquisition of Motor Skılls. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Education.
  28. Turner, T. (1998) A Concise Guide for the Teacher-Coach to Successfully Observe and Correct Motor Skills. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Vol. 69 No. 3 pp. 7–9
  29. Wang, J. & Griffin, M. (1998). Early Correction of Movement Errors Can Help Student Performance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Vol:69, No:4