Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Radiological and Laboratory Parameters on Prognosis in COVID-19 Disease

COVID-19 Hastalığında Radyolojik ve Laboratuvar Parametrelerinin Prognoza Etkisi

Pages
203–207
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Initial mean CRP value for pandemic service group was 68.14±6.5 mg/dL (3.11−271), whereas it was 117.07±11.5 mg/dL (0−360) for ICU (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: A previously unknown contagious disease, which later turned out to be a world-wide pandemic originated from Wuhan, capital of Hubei province in China by the end of 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While this upheaval affected numerous countries tragically, mortality rate and neces-sity for ICU were relatively low in Turkey.Methods: A total of 166 patients (65 at ICU, 101 at pandemic service) were analyzed to uncover effect of radiological and laboratory parameters on prognosis in COVID-19.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Initial mean CRP value for pandemic service group was 68.14±6.5 mg/dL (3.11−271), whereas it was 117.07±11.5 mg/dL (0−360) for ICU (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: A previously unknown contagious disease, which later turned out to be a world-wide pandemic originated from Wuhan, capital of Hubei province in China by the end of 2019. While this upheaval affected numerous countries tragically, mortality rate and neces-sity for ICU were relatively low in Turkey.Methods: A total of 166 patients (65 at ICU, 101 at pandemic service) were analyzed to uncover effect of radiological and laboratory parameters on prognosis in COVID-19. One hundred and one patients (60.8%) were treated in pandemic service and 65 (39.15%) were treated in ICU.Results: Mean age of the patients in pandemic service was 61.1±16.2 (23−93) and of pa-tients in ICU was 64.6±15.7 (15−90) (p>0.05). Initial mean CRP value for pandemic service group was 68.14±6.5 mg/dL (3.11−271), whereas it was 117.07±11.5 mg/dL (0−360) for ICU (p

Özet

Amaç: 2019 yılı sonlarına doğru daha önceden bilinmeyen bir hastalık Çin’in Hubei bölgesinin Wuhan kentinde ortaya çıktı ve sonrasında dünya çapına yayılarak bir pandemiye dönüştü. Bu salgın birçok ülkeyi etkiledi fakat Türkiye’de diğer ülkelere göre mortalite oranlarının ve yoğun bakım ihtiyacının nispeten daha düşük olduğu gözlemlendi. Bu çalışmamızda servis ve yoğun bakım hastalarını karşılaştırarak serviste takip edilen hastaların, yoğun bakım ihtiyacını azaltan faktörleri değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Toplam 166 hasta COVID-19’un radyolojik ve laboratuvar bulgularını ortaya çıkarmak için araştırıldı. Yüz bir (%60.8) hasta pandemi servisinde, 65 hasta da (%39.15) yoğun bakım ünitesinde tedavi edildi.Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaşları değerlendirildiğinde pandemi servisinde ortalama 61.1±16.2 (23−93), yoğun bakım ünitesinde ise ortalama 64.6±15.7 (15−90) olarak saptandı (p>0.05). İlk bakılan ortalama CRP değerleri pandemi servisinde takip edilen hastalarda orta-lama 68.14±6.5 mg/dl (3.11−271), yoğun bakım ünitesinde takip edilen hastalarda ise ortalama 117.07±11.5 mg/dl (0−360) olarak saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GEYİK, F. D., KOYUNCU, K., DEMİRHAN, R., ÇİMENOĞLU, B., ÖZER, K. B., ÖZDEMİR, A., BUZ, M. (2022). The Effect of Radiological and Laboratory Parameters on Prognosis in COVID-19 Disease. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 203–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/592801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. J Med Virol 2020;92:401–2
  2. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507–13
  3. Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Hayden FG. Clinical Virology, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2016
  4. World health organization coronavirus (covid 19). Available at: https://covid19.who.int Accessed Sep 1, 2020
  5. Guan CS, Lv ZB, Yan S, Du YN, Chen H, Wei LG, et al. Imaging Features of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evaluation on Thin-Section CT. Acad Radiol 2020;27:609–13
  6. Wang K, Kang S, Tian R, Zhang X, Zhang X, Wang Y. Imaging manifestations and diagnostic value of chest CT of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Xiaogan area. Clin Radiol 2020;75:341–7
  7. Huang X, Wei F, Hu L, Wen L, Chen K. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19. Arch Iran Med 2020;23:268–71
  8. Li K, Wu J, Wu F, Guo D, Chen L, Fang Z, et al. The Clinical and Chest CT Features Associated With Severe and Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia. Invest Radiol 2020;55:327–31
  9. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, et al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology 2020;296:E32–E40
  10. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun 2020;109:102433
  11. Sun C, Zhang XB, Dai Y, Xu XZ, Zhao J. Clinical analysis of 150 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in Nanyang City, Henan Province. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2020;43:503–8
  12. Magro C, Mulvey JJ, Berlin D, Nuovo G, Salvatore S, Harp J, et al. Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: A report of five cases. Transl Res 2020;220:1–13.