Journals / Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

SOCIAL CAPITAL REVISITED: CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT

Pages
135–184
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, concertedly utilised quantitative and qualitative methods would provide the broadest and convenient data and information about social capital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of social capital implies to the benefit of social relations for individuals and community.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The complicated structure of social capital led the theoreticians to see it from varying aspects and forms, and the researchers to measure it in many different ways.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, concertedly utilised quantitative and qualitative methods would provide the broadest and convenient data and information about social capital.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: Social Capital · Social Relations · Social Ties

Özet

The concept of social capital implies to the benefit of social relations for individuals and community. The complicated structure of social capital led the theoreticians to see it from varying aspects and forms, and the researchers to measure it in many different ways. Examining the existing studies in the literature, it is understood that while measuring social capital, a definition of the aspects and the level of analysis appropriate to the social capital theory that is employed is necessary. In this context, the researcher has to decide the level of the research and the theory that lays behind the necessary assumptions for the study. It is essential to consider both structural and cognitive aspects of social capital for its measurement. Regarding the data sources that are utilized in the existing empirical studies, time-use surveys provide a broad scale information that enable to investigate the structural aspect of social capital-which might be observed via objective methods, but it is limited for the cognitive aspect- which might be better observed via subjective methods. Hence, concertedly utilised quantitative and qualitative methods would provide the broadest and convenient data and information about social capital.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACIMAHMUTOĞLU, H., KAPTANOĞLU, İ. Y. (2022). SOCIAL CAPITAL REVISITED: CONCEPT AND MEASUREMENT. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 135–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/592575

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aaltio, I., Kyrö, P. and Sundin, E. (2008). Women Entrepreneurship and Social Capital A Dialogue and Construction. Copenhagen Business School Press.
  2. Addis, E. and Joxhe, M. (2016). Gender Gaps in Social Capital: A Theoretical Interpretation of the Italian Evidence. Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali ed Economiche, Working Paper Series No.2/2016.
  3. Afanasev, D.V., Guzhavina, T.A. and Mekhova, A.A. (2016). Social Capital in a Region: Revisiting the Measurement and Building of an Indicator Model. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol.6, No.48, pp.110–125.
  4. Akın, C.S. and Aytun, C. (2014). Sosyal Sermayenin İşgücü Piyasası Üzerine Etkileri: Panel Nedensellik Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 9, Sayı: 2, s. 65–80.
  5. Ardahan, F. (2012).
  6. Sosyal Sermaye Ölçeği Geçerlilik, Güvenirlilik Çalışması. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 773–789.
  7. Ardahan, F. and Ezici, M.N. (2014). İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencileri Sosyal Sermaye Ölçeği Adaptasyon Çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education. Vol.4, No.3, pp. 6–17.
  8. Arrow, K. J. (2000). Observations on Social Capital. In Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I. (2000) Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington D.C.: World Bank. Aydemir, M.A. (2011). Toplumsal İlişkilerin Sosyal Sermaye Değeri (Topluluk Duygusu ve Sosyal Sermaye Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Doktora Tezi. Babacan, M.E. (2012). Toplumsal Paylaşım Ağlarında Sosyal Sermaye Pratikleri. Doktora Tezi. Bahtiyar, B. (2017). Sosyal Sermaye Faktörünün Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Doktora Tezi. Basut, Ö. (2020). Sosyal Sermayenin Kalkınma Üzerine Etkisi: Kars İli Üzerine Araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Baş, F.C. (2018). Sosyal Medya Davranışının Oluşumu: Çevrimiçi Ortamlarda Güven, Sosyal Sermaye ve Saygınlık İlişkisi. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt 21, Sayı 2, s. 49–85.
  9. Beugelsdijk, S. and van Schaik, T. (2005). Differences in Social Capital Between 54 Western European Regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 1053–1064.
  10. Beyer, B.A. (2003). Feminist Consciousness and Social Capital: Bonds, Breaks, and Bridges. Master’s Thesis. Illinois. Boarini, R., Kolev, A. and McGregor, A. (2014). Measuring Well-being and Progress in Countries at Different Stages of Development: Towards a More Universal Conceptual Framework. (2014) OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 325. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of The