SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoekonomi / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 53

Determinants of Fiscal Decentralization in OECD Countries

OECD Ülkelerinde Mali Yerelleşmenin Belirleyenleri

Tuğba BERÇİNTÜRK
Ahmet Burçin YERELİ
Pages
291–328
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the effects of income, area, population, urbanisation, ethnic fractionalisation, human development, globalisation, institutional factors, income distribution, economic stability, and participatory budgeting on fiscal decentralisation are examined empirically using the data of OECD countries between 2000-2016 and the Panel Corrected Standard Errors method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the idea that decentralised delivery of public goods and services increases economic efficiency and social welfare, activities are carried out in many countries to increase the share of lower-level governments in the fulfilment of economic functions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the idea that decentralised delivery of public goods and services increases economic efficiency and social welfare, activities are carried out in many countries to increase the share of lower-level governments in the fulfilment of economic functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the effects of income, area, population, urbanisation, ethnic fractionalisation, human development, globalisation, institutional factors, income distribution, economic stability, and participatory budgeting on fiscal decentralisation are examined empirically using the data of OECD countries between 2000-2016 and the Panel Corrected Standard Errors method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mali Yerelleşme · İnsani Gelişme · Katılımcı Bütçeleme

Abstract

With the idea that decentralised delivery of public goods and services increases economic efficiency and social welfare, activities are carried out in many countries to increase the share of lower-level governments in the fulfilment of economic functions. In this study, the effects of income, area, population, urbanisation, ethnic fractionalisation, human development, globalisation, institutional factors, income distribution, economic stability, and participatory budgeting on fiscal decentralisation are examined empirically using the data of OECD countries between 2000-2016 and the Panel Corrected Standard Errors method.

Özet

Kamusal mal ve hizmetlerin yerel düzeyde sunulmasının ekonomik etkinlik ve sosyal refah düzeyini artıracağı düşüncesiyle birlikte birçok ülkede yerel yönetimlerin ekonomik fonksiyonlarını artırmaya yönelik çalışmalar gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bu araştırmada gelir, alan büyüklüğü, nüfus, kentleşme, etnik çeşitlilik, insani gelişme, küreselleşme, kurumsal faktörler, gelir dağılımı, ekonomik istikrar ve katılımcı bütçelemenin mali yerelleşme üzerindeki etkisi OECD ülkelerinin 2000-2016 yılları arasındaki verileri kullanılarak ve Panel Düzeltilmiş Standart Hatalar yöntemi ile ampirik olarak hesaplanmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BERÇİNTÜRK, T., YERELİ, A. B. (2022). Determinants of Fiscal Decentralization in OECD Countries. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 53, 291–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/592440

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alexeev, M. & A. Mamedov (2017), “Factors Determining Intra-Regional Fiscal Decentralization in Russia and The US”, Russian Journal of Economics, 3(4), 425-444.
  2. Armey, L.E. & R.M. McNab (2018), “Expenditure Decentralization and Natural Resources”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, (70), 52-61.
  3. Arzaghi, M. & A. Balthrop (2018), “No Taxation, No Representation: An Investigation of the Relationship Between Natural Resources and Fiscal Decentralization”, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(7), 1234-1255.
  4. Arzaghi, M. & J.V. Henderson (2005), “Why Countries Are Fiscally Decentralizing”, Journal of Public Economics, 89(7), 1157-1189.
  5. Asteriou, D. & S.G. Hall (2011),
  6. Applied Econometrics, Palgrave Macmillan. Bahl, R. & S. Nath (1986), “Public Expenditure Decentralization in Developing Countries”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 4(4), 405-418.
  7. Baltagi, B.H. (2005),
  8. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Benk, S. & T. Akdemir (2004), “Globalleşme ve Ekonomik Değişim”, Çimento İşveren Dergisi, 18(1), 12-27.
  9. Boadway, R. & S. Dougherty (2018), “Decentralisation in a Globalised World: Consequences and Opportunities”, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, OECD. Bodman, P. & A. Hodge (2010), “What Drives Fiscal Decentralisation? Further Assessing the Role of Income”, Fiscal Studies, 31(3), 373-404.
  10. Buchanan, J.M. (1965),
  11. The Public Finances, Richard D. Irwin Inc. Bülbül, D. (2013), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Yeni Bir Finansman Yöntemi: Günah Vergileri”, Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 294(167), 166-170.
  12. Canavire-Bacarreza, G. & J. Martinez-Vazquez (2012), Reexamining the Determinants of Fiscal Decentralization: What Is The Role of Geography?, International Center for Public Policy. CLG (2008), Participatory Budgeting: A Draft National Strategy, London, England: Department for Communities and Local Government. Çobanoğulları, G. & A.B. Yereli (2017), “Katılımcı Demokrasi ve Bütçeleme”, Sosyoekonomi, 25(31), 109-125.
  13. De Mello, L. & J.T. Jalles (2019), “The Global Crisis And Intergovernmental Relations: Centralization Versus Decentralization 10 Years On”, Regional Studies, 54(7), 1-16.
  14. De Mello, L. (2005), “Globalization and Fiscal Federalism: Does Openness Constraint Subnational Budget”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), 1-14.
  15. Ermini, B. & R. Santolini (2014), “Does Globalization Matter on Fiscal Decentralization? New Evidence from the OECD”, Global Economic Review, 43(2), 153-183.
  16. Faguet, J.-P. (2014), “Decentralizat