Journals / Sayıştay Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 111

AN INTERCULTURAL COMPARISON ON THE VALUE PERCEPTIONS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN DEĞER ALGILARI ÜZERİNE KÜLTÜRLERARASI BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMA

Pages
101–123
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results are important as they showed that individual valuescannot be treated independently of culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between individual and social value perceptions and consumption valuesof university students studying at Urumqi Xinjiang University (China), Paris 13th Regional University (France), Osmania University (India), Istanbul University, Marmara University (Turkey) and Vienna University (Austria).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, this study tried to determine whether individual and social value perceptions and consumption valuesof students differed in terms of individual characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results are important as they showed that individual valuescannot be treated independently of culture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between individual and social value perceptions and consumption valuesof university students studying at Urumqi Xinjiang University (China), Paris 13th Regional University (France), Osmania University (India), Istanbul University, Marmara University (Turkey) and Vienna University (Austria). In addition, this study tried to determine whether individual and social value perceptions and consumption valuesof students differed in terms of individual characteristics. The main question of the study was “Do individual and social value perceptions and consumption values of university students from different cultural backgrounds differ in terms of personality characteristics?” The study was designed according to quantitative research method. The study results were analyzed by difference and relationship tests; findings were discussed; and generalizations were made regarding the study universe. The study is important in terms of giving opportunity to intercultural comparisons. According to the findings of the study, the individual and social value perceptions and consumption valuesof the sample differed according to the cultures. These results are important as they showed that individual valuescannot be treated independently of culture.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı Urumçi Xinjiang Üniversitesi (Çin), Paris 13. Bölge Üniversitesi (Fransa), Osmania Üniversitesi (Hindistan), İstanbul Üniversitesi, Marmara Üniversitesi (Türkiye) ve Viyana Üniversitesi’nde (Avusturya) öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin bireysel ve toplumsal değer algıları ve tüketim değerleri arasında ilişkiyi tespit etmektir. Ayrıca araştırmada öğrencilerin, bireysel ve toplumsal değer algıları ve tüketim değerlerinin bireysel özellikleri itibariyle farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın temel sorusu farklı kültürel çevrelerden gelen üniversite öğrencilerinin bireysel ve toplumsal değer algıları ve tüketim değerleri kişilik özellikleri itibariyle farklılaşmakta mıdır? şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemine göre tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları fark ve ilişki testleriyle analiz edilmiş, elde edilen bulgular tartışılarak çalışma evreniyle ilgili genellemeye gidilmiştir. Çalışma, kültürlerarası karşılaştırmaya fırsat vermesi bakımından önemlidir. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre örneklemin bireysel, toplumsal değer algıları ve tüketim değerleri, kültürlere göre farklılaşmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, bireysel değerlerin kültürden bağımsız olarak ele alınamayacağını göstermesi bakımından önemli görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAR, H., BAŞPINAR, N. Ö., ÇOBAN, D. T., ATAŞ, M. (2022). AN INTERCULTURAL COMPARISON ON THE VALUE PERCEPTIONS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Sayıştay Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 111, 101–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/591261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Ajzen, Icek & Martin Fishbein (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Allport, G. Williard, Ewart P. Vernon (1931),
  2. A Study of Values, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Barenbaum, B. Nicole, David G. Winter (2008), “History of Modern Personality Theory and Research”, Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Oliver. P. John, Richard W. Robins ve Lawrence. A. Pervin (Eds.), Guilford Press,
  3. New York. Berzonsky, D. Michael (2003), “Identity Style and Well-being: Does Commitment Matter?: Identity”, An International Journal of Theory and Research, Cilt 3. Berzonsky, D. Michael ve Joseph R. Ferrari (2009), “A Diffuse-avoidant Identity Processing Style: Strategic Avoidance or Self-confusion?: Identity”, An International Journal of Theory and Research, Cilt 9. Chen, Victoria (2011), “Authenticity and Identity in the Portable Homeland”, The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication, Thomas K. Nakayama ve Rona Tamiko Halualani (Ed), Blackwell Publishing, New Jersey. Cheng, Chi-Ying, Angela K. Y. Leung (2012), “Revisiting the Multicultural Experience-Creativity Link: The Effects of Perceived Cultural Distance and Comparison Mind-set”, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Cilt 4, Sayı 4. Cox, J. Ben (2004), “The Role of Communication, Technology, and Cultural Identity in Repatriation Adjustment”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Cilt 28, Sayı 3–4.
  4. Curtin, L. Melissa (2010), “Coculturation: Towards a Critical Theoretical Framework of Cultural Adjustment”, The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication, Thomas K. Nakayama ve Rona Tamiko Halualani (Ed), Blackwell Publishing, New Jersey. Erdem, A. Rıza (2003), “Üniversite Kültüründe Önemli Bir Unsur: Değerler”, Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 4. Grebitus, Carola, Bodo Steiner ve Michele Veeman (2013), “Personal Values and Decision Making: Evidence from Environmental Footprint Labeling in Canada”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics—Proceedings, Cilt 95, Sayı 2. Hills, M. David (2002), “Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Values Orientation Theory”, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Cilt 4, Sayı 4. Kuşdil, M. Ersin, Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı (2000), “Türk Öğretmenlerin Değer Yönelimleri ve Schwartz Değer Kuramı”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt 15, Sayı 45. Kluckhohn, Clyde (1951), “Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action”, Toward A General Theory of Action, Talcott Parsons ve Edward A. Shills (Ed), Harvard