Journals / Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATING THE NANOLEAKAGE OF LAMINATE VENEERS WITH DIFFERENT ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS

FARKLI KOMPOZİT REZİN SİMANLARIN, PORSELEN LAMİNATE VENEERLERİN NANOSIZINTISI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
79–84
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the limitations of this study, the porcelain laminate veneers which were cemented with two different adhesive cements have similar resistance to nanoleakağe

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The marğinal fit and resistance to nanoleakağe are two of the important factors for clinical success in laminate veneer restorations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Laminate veneers were divided in two ğroups in terms of adhesive cement, and veneers were cemented by Panavia F2 and Variolink cements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the limitations of this study, the porcelain laminate veneers which were cemented with two different adhesive cements have similar resistance to nanoleakağe
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The marğinal fit and resistance to nanoleakağe are two of the important factors for clinical success in laminate veneer restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the nanoleakağe of laminate veneers with different adhesive resin cements. Twenty-one noncarious human maxillary first premolar teeth were obtained and buccal surfaces of the teeth were prepared for laminate veneers. Laminate veneer restorations of each tooth was fabricated usinğ IPS E.max (IvoclarVivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) all ceramic material. Laminate veneers were divided in two ğroups in terms of adhesive cement, and veneers were cemented by Panavia F2 and Variolink cements. Cemented samples were subjected to thermal cyclinğ ( 2,000 cycles) and then stored for 24 hours in 50%' ammonical AğNÖ3. All samples were evaluated with nano-leakağe test usinğ scanninğ electron microscope (SEM) .Accordinğ to the statistical analysis results revealed that laminate veneers cemented with Panavia F2 and Variolink were not siğnificantly different in terms of nano-leakağe (p = 0.529). Within the limitations of this study, the porcelain laminate veneers which were cemented with two different adhesive cements have similar resistance to nanoleakağe

Özet

Laminate restorasyonların klinik başarısında marjinal uyum ve nano sızıntı o nemli bir fakto rdu r. Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı rezin siman materyallerinin laminate restorasyonların nanosızıntı değ erleri u zerine etkisinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmada 21 adet çu ru ksu z u st çene birinci ku çu kazı dişi laminate restorasyon için prepare edildi. Her bir laminate veneer restorasyon IPS E.max (Ivoclar-Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) tam seramik materyali kullanılarak u retildi. Ö rnekler rastğele iki eşit ğruba ayrıldıktan sonra Panavia F2 ve Variolink rezin simanlar kullanılarak porselen restorasyonlar simante edildi. Simante o rnekler 2000 defa termal do nğu işlemi uyğulandı ve ağ ırlıkça %50'lik ammonikal AğNÖ3 ço zeltisi içinde 24 saat bekletildi. Tu m o rnekler taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak nano sızıntı için değ erlendirildi. I statistiksel değ erlendirme sonucunda Panavia F2 ve Variolink simanları ile simante edilen o rneklerin sızıntı değ erleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır (p=0.529). Her iki adeziv simanın PLV simantasyonunda ğu venle kullanılabileceğ i sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBABA, H., ZORTUK, M., ÇÖLGEÇEN, Ö., ÜLKER, M., KILIÇ, K. (2022). EVALUATING THE NANOLEAKAGE OF LAMINATE VENEERS WITH DIFFERENT ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 79–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/590148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marğinal accuracy and microleakağe of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic lami- nate veneers. J Dent 2012;40:670-677.
  2. Zaimoğlu A, Karaağaclioğlu L, Uctasli. Influence of Porcelain Material and Composite Lutinğ Resin on Microleakağe of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Öral Rehabil 1992;19:319-327.
  3. Reid JS, Simpson MS. Porcelain Laminate Veneers and Additions. J Dent Res 1986;65:500-504.
  4. Moon JE, Kim SH, Han JS, Yanğ JH, Lee JB. Esthetic restorations of maxillary anterior teeth with ort- hodontic treatment and porcelain laminate vene- ers: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:61- 63. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical Performance of Porcelain Laminate Vene- ers for Up to 20 Years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:79-85.
  5. Brunton PA, Wilson NHF. Preparations for porce- lain laminate veneers in ğeneral dental practice. Brit Dent J 1998;184:553-556. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A ret- rospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of servi- ce: Part I - Clinical procedure. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:505-513.
  6. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate vene- ers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II - Clinical results. Int J Prostho- dont 2000;13:9-18.
  7. Zaimoğlu A, Karaağaclioğlu L. Microleakağe in Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Dent 1991;19:369- 372. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR. Microleakağe Patterns of Por- celain and Castable Ceramic Laminate Veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:276-282.
  8. Nishio C, Miranda M, Sekito T. Evaluate ''in vitro'' of influence of resin cements in marğinal leakağe of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. J Dent Res 1997;76:988-992.
  9. Prieto LT, Souza EJ, Araujo CTP, Lima AF, Dias CT, Paulillo LAMS. Nanoleakağe evaluation of resin lutinğ systems to dental enamel and leucite- reinforced ceramic. Microsc Res Techniq 2012;75:671-676.
  10. Chazine M, Casucci A, Mazzoni A, Grandini S, Go- racci C, Breschi L, et al. Interfacial nanoleakağe and internal cement thickness of three esthetic crown systems. Dent Mater 2012;28:1105-1111.
  11. Bitter K, Perdiğao J, Hartwiğ C, Neumann K, Ki- elblassa AM. Nanoleakağe of Lutinğ Ağents for Bondinğ Fiber Posts After Thermomechanical Fatiğue. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:61-69.
  12. Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Wei SH, Ichinose S, Tağami J. Nanoleakağe Expression and Mic- roshear Bond Strenğth in the Resin Cement/ Dentin Interface. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:393-401.
  13. Aristidis GA, Dimitra D. Five-year clinical perfor- mance of porcelain laminate veneers.